Category: Non-Video

  • Sweet Molasses Feed Key to Understanding Grazing Behavior in Cattle

    Researchers tempted grazing cattle with sweet molasses feed to discover whether cows would roam far and wide to graze or stick close to the herd, water supplies and feed stations.

    The findings by animal scientists at the University of California, Davis, and published in the journal Scientific Reports, offer a low-cost way for ranchers and others to identify the best cows for their landscapes to optimize grazing while meeting the nutritional needs of cattle.

    This is the third in a series of papers about research seeking to better understand the grazing personalities of cattle. The first studies established that the cows weren’t mindless wanderers or followers but had personalities that differentiated how far and wide they would graze, said Kristina Horback, the senior author on the paper and an associate professor in the Department of Animal Science.

    “This final study is trying to figure out, ‘Can we have any early indicators so that we don’t have to put GPS collars on all cows, but just do a quick practical test?’” Horback said.

    Water quality, soil health and habitats can be degraded by cattle grazing unevenly or concentrated in specific areas. A herd with animals that wander around a landscape to graze can benefit the landscape by distributing grazing areas and defecation sites while also reducing fuel loads for wildfires.

    Routine checks yield grazing personality

    The research took place from June to August over two years at the UC Sierra Foothill Research and Extension Center in Browns Valley. Horback and others tracked 50 pregnant Angus and Hereford beef cows wearing GPS collars across the 625-acre site, which is a mix of grassland and treed areas. The elevation ranged from 600 to 2,028 feet.

    Researchers were able to predict cows’ likely grazing personalities by analyzing behavior in situations such as pregnancy checks or vaccinations, which require the cows to walk through chutes or narrow passageways.

    At the end of the chutes, the cows had two choices: go one direction to join the herd or another direction to pursue sweet molasses feed placed at different distances. The animals that moved slowly through the chutes and would go out of the way for the feed were consistently the grazing wanderers.

    “They were the ones on range that would go far and wide, that would also not really be that motivated to be closely, tightly packed with the rest of the herd,” Horback said.

    The homebodies consistently sought out the herd.

    “They would not choose that sweet molasses,” Horback said. “They would go right back to the herd as quickly as they could, and then on range, they would just stay together. They have their social group there.”

    Future generations

    Next up in the research is to see if grazing personalities pass down to later generations. Horback is looking at the female calves of the studied cows to see if they pick up on the same patterns as their moms.

    “If there are any calves who are fostered off to another cow, do they pick up the grazing patterns of their birth mom or their adopted mom?” Horback said. “There’s no guarantee that genetics alone will determine the grazing behavior of a cow, but it could increase the likelihood that a cow is a hill-climber or a bottom-dweller.”

    She is also working with colleagues in New Zealand and New Mexico to analyze blood samples from the cows that were tracked as part of related studies to see if genetic testing can provide some insight into behavior.

    UC Davis emeritus professor Juan Medrano published research a decade ago about genetic markers in cows that could indicate either hill-climbers or bottom-dwellers.

    “I hope to build on that knowledge with a larger, international dataset to understand whether grazing personalities are heritable,” Horback said.

    Maggie Creamer, who earned her Ph.D. in animal behavior at UC Davis, contributed to the research, which was supported by the Russell L. Rustici Rangeland and Cattle Research Endowment. — By Emily C. Dooley, UC Davis

  • Historic Grape Crush Report and Live-Streamed Event to Explain It All

    California has just come off of the smallest grape crush the state has experienced in decades. Join American Vineyard live on February 21, 2025, at 10 AM PST to review the 2024 Grape Crush Report and what it means to wine grape growers, vintners, and industry stakeholders in California and worldwide. American Vineyard Live and the team at Turrentine Brokerage will dive deep into questions stakeholders have such as: What is the Grape Crush Report? Why such a low crush this year? Why were quality grapes left unharvested in 2024? How will the 2024 Grape Crush Report impact my decisions in 2025 and beyond? Will the wine market improve in 2025? How can we use the 2024 Grape Crush Report? What can the 2024 Grape Crush Report do to help me make decisions for my vineyard?

    The panel discussion will be streamed live from Fresno, California for all interested viewers worldwide. It is a FREE live stream for anyone who would like to attend virtually. Registered viewers will be automatically entered into a drawing to win a $100 Amazon Gift card or brand new Bahco hand pruning tools. Prize winners will be announced during the event (must be “present” online to win).

    Questions about the 2024 Grape Crush Report for the panelists can be submitted when registering to attend. Questions will be answered live during the event.

    No special software or login is needed to register or join the event. Just register HERE, and a link to join the event will be emailed to the address provided.

    Stay informed on the 2024 Grape Crush Report and how it can serve as a compass to lead to a more successful 2025! “There has never been a more crucial time to use the information we have to navigate the headwinds of today’s market. We look forward to seeing you on the live stream!” says Matthew Malcolm, Editor of American Vineyard Magazine.

    REGISTER HERE

  • Lodi Winegrape Commission Honors Executive Director Stuart Spencer for 25 Years of Service

    The Lodi Winegrape Commission Board of Directors proudly recognizes Executive Director Stuart Spencer for his 25 years of service to the organization. Spencer joined as the Program Manager in 1999, before his promotion to Executive Director in 2018. The Board honored Spencer at this week’s annual meeting in Lodi, which was attended by over 150 community members and friends of the region.

    “During the past 25 years, Stuart has been an asset to the wine industry, specifically for the Lodi region,” said Board Chair Diego Olagaray to the group in attendance. “As a winemaker and winegrower, Stuart possesses unique perspectives on the wine industry’s domestic and international issues, which have helped to expand and strengthen the region and set him apart from his peers.”

    Upon joining the Commission, Spencer championed the installation and opening of the Lodi Wine Visitor Center, the first of its kind when it opened in 2000. Today, this wine shop and tasting room serves as a central hub for Lodi producers which lack brick-and-mortar venues to showcase their wine. The center also serves as an education station and guide to the Lodi Appellation, annually welcoming thousands of visitors. Since its opening, the center has undergone two redesigns to maintain a modern and on-brand aesthetic – efforts Spencer has helped guide.

    Since early on, Spencer has overseen the Commission’s marketing program, providing instrumental guidance and support on branding, advertising, public relations, and regional events. Notable initiatives include:

    • ZinFest – Wine, Food & Fun at Lodi Lake (2005)
    • LoCA – The Wines of Lodi, California Branding and Marketing Campaign (2011)
    • Lodi Wine Rebranding and Marketing Campaign (2020)
    • Save the Old Vines Marketing Campaign (2020)
    • “A Rising Tide” Lodi Grower Video Series and Marketing Campaign (2023)

    During his tenure, Spencer has also been heavily involved in educational efforts for the Lodi winegrape industry, including recent initiatives to focus attention on California winegrower challenges and opportunities in the current wine industry. He has played a critical role in developing the LODI RULES for Sustainable Winegrowing program which celebrated its 20th year of certification in January. Since 2005, the program has grown from 1,555 acres of certified sustainable Lodi vineyards to over 75,000 acres of planted vines certified in California, Washington, and Israel.

    “Stuart is a remarkable individual with great insights, and a strategic vision paired with the tactical expertise to know what’s possible,” stated Mark Chandler, the Lodi Winegrape Commission’s first executive director who hired Spencer in 1999. “His steady influence and advocacy for our winegrowing community continues to make great progress for the region. Stuart enhances and elevates the position of our wines on the world stage, while still being authentically Lodi every step of the way.”

    The Lodi Winegrape Commission represents more than 750 winegrape growers farming over 100,000 vineyard acres, and includes 80+ wineries in the Lodi American Viticulture Area (AVA). The Lodi AVA is the second largest in California and crushes a little over 20% of California’s premium winegrapes. The region’s annual yield of over 592,000 tons of winegrapes was valued at over $360 million in 2024.

    “Stuart and I both come from multi-generational Lodi winemaking families and it has been a pleasure to see all the work he has done bringing our amazing people, place and wines into the spotlight,” said Joan Kautz, Lodi Winegrape Commission Grower Marketing Committee Chair and Global Sales & Marketing Director for Ironstone Vineyards. “His 25 years of service are nothing short of tremendous, and I am excited to continue working with him on behalf of the region for years to come.”

    About the Lodi Winegrape Commission

    Established in 1991, the Lodi Winegrape Commission represents the common interests of Lodi winegrowers with programs in marketing, education, research, and sustainable viticulture. The Commission collectively and effectively promotes Lodi’s vibrant, multi-generational farming community and California’s most dynamic wine region. Comprised of nine commissioners and nine alternates, the board of directors provides direction and input on behalf of the region’s 750 winegrowers. For more information about the Lodi Winegrape Commission, visit lodigrowers.com.

    About the Lodi American Viticultural Area (AVA)

    A historic winegrowing region since the 1850s, Lodi is perfectly situated 40 miles south of Sacramento and 90 miles east of San Francisco. Lodi’s Mediterranean climate and distinct soils allow its growers to cultivate more than 130 winegrape varieties, making Lodi the most diverse winegrowing region in the United States. The region also serves as home to 80 boutique wineries specializing in small-lot, handmade wines that have garnered major awards at domestic and international wine competitions.

    Lodi is naturally a leader in sustainable viticulture. Created by California farmers and accredited by world-renowned scientists, LODI RULES is America’s original sustainable winegrowing program. Held to a high standard of scientific rigor and excellence, the program emphasizes environmentally and socially responsible practices, while keeping economic feasibility in mind for long-term business success. Today, there are more than 75,000 acres certified throughout California, in Washington, and Israel. For more information about the Lodi AVA or LODI RULES, visit lodiwine.com and lodirules.org.

  • Student Ambassadors to Share California Dairy Messages With International Audience

    Anissa Borges of Tulare and Dayana Limon Santiago of Wasco have been selected to represent the California Milk Advisory Board (CMAB) in Thailand during the 2025 CMAB International Internship Program.

    Anissa Borges

    Borges and Santiago were both chosen based on academic achievement, connection to the California dairy industry, and willingness to travel abroad to learn more about international dairy sales and marketing. The goal of the International Internship Program is to provide young agriculture and dairy college students with an opportunity to learn about dairy foods and marketing in the international marketplace, with a focus on developing leaders who will serve on dairy industry boards, work in dairy foods processing, or in sales or marketing.

    Over the six-week period, Borges and Santiago will spend time with the in-country CMAB marketing team in Thailand to gain a better understanding of markets, consumer buying habits, and promotional efforts on behalf of California’s dairy industry.

    “California currently accounts for around 33 percent of all U.S. dairy exports so international trade is essential for our continued growth. Over the last decade and a half, the CMAB has worked closely with partners in Thailand to develop markets for California dairy products. This program is focused on providing insight into international dairy marketing for future leaders,” said Glenn Millar, Director of International Business Development for the CMAB.

    Borges is currently working towards her B.S in Agribusiness at California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, where she is involved with the Dairy Club. Borges was an active member of FFA, where she showed dairy cattle. She also served as District 9 Dairy Princess during her Junior year of high school. Upon completion of the internship program, she will continue to advocate for the dairy industry and hopes to incorporate this passion into her career.

    Santiago also is attending California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, where she is working towards a B.S in Agricultural Science. She plans to pursue her M.S in Agricultural Education and become an agricultural educator. She is currently a social media manager for the Pacific Coast Coalition, where she creates and manages content highlighting dairy industry trends, innovations and sustainability efforts.

    California is the nation’s leading milk producer, and makes more butter, ice cream and nonfat dry milk than any other state. California is the second-largest producer of cheese and yogurt. California milk and dairy foods can be identified by the Real California Milk seal, which certifies they are made with milk from the state’s dairy farm families.

    About Real California Milk/California Milk Advisory Board
    The California Milk Advisory Board (CMAB), an instrumentality of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, is funded by the state’s dairy farm families who lead the nation in sustainable dairy farming practices. With a vision to nourish the world with the wholesome goodness of Real California Milk, the CMAB’s programs focus on increasing demand for California’s sustainable dairy products in the state, across the U.S. and around the world. Connect with the CMAB at RealCaliforniaMilk.com, Facebook, YouTube, Tik Tok, Instagram, and Pinterest.

  • Soil Health Academy Selects New Board Member, Executive Director

    The Soil Health Academy has announced that Kent Donica has been selected as secretary/treasurer of the non-profit regenerative agriculture education organization. SHA also announced that Doug Voss has been selected as SHA’s first executive director.

    Donica is a fourth-generation rancher from southern Oklahoma and a consultant for the regenerative agriculture consulting firm Understanding Ag, LLC.

    “Discovering and experimenting with soil health-focused regenerative ranching principles and practices made my ranching operation more profitable and changed my outlook and my family’s future for the better,” Donica said. “As an SHA board member, my goal is to help guide this amazing organization so others can also discover and profit from these transformational soil health and adaptive grazing principles.”

    Voss is a third-generation “farmer-turned-AMP-grazer” at his family operation near Paynesville, Minnesota, where he and his wife Beth are raising their family of five boys. A previous SHA board member, he also serves as a consultant with Understanding Ag.

    In his new role as executive director, Voss will oversee the implementation and evaluation of the Soil Health Academy’s strategic plan and will seek funding to enable the organization to achieve its short- and long-term strategic goals and objectives.

    “I’m excited to build upon the past successes of the organization and to further expand the reach and impact of SHA by developing relationships with donors, sponsors, and grant-making organizations,” Voss said. “All of our efforts are focused on helping farmers, ranchers and consumers more fully realize the power of regenerating the health of our soil, farms, food and futures.”

    In its eighth year of operation, SHA provides education through its on-farm schools and workshops across North America to help agricultural producers successfully and profitably apply lower-input, regenerative agriculture principles and practices in their respective operations.

    SHA president Kim Barmann said SHA’s latest personnel selections will help take the organization to the “next level” in delivering world-class soil health education to wider audiences.

    “I’ve served on the board of SHA since its inception eight years ago, and I’ve never been more excited about the organization’s future,” Barmann said. “I’m confident Doug’s and Kent’s leadership skills, regenerative expertise and organizational knowhow will help SHA more effectively deliver education that empowers regeneration—well into the future.”

  • Applications Open for California Agricultural Leadership Program Class 55

    Applications are now being accepted for Class 55 of the California Agricultural Leadership Program (CALP). Applicants should be mid-career growers, farmers, ranchers, horticulturalists, foresters and/or individuals working in other areas of California’s diverse agriculture industry.

    The Ag Leadership Program, operated by the California Agricultural Leadership Foundation (CALF), is considered to be one of the premier leadership development experiences in the United States. Through the program, fellows learn leadership skills that help them expand their impact. More than 1,400 individuals have participated in the program and are influential leaders and active volunteers in agriculture, communities, government, business and other areas.

    Over the course of the intensive 17-month program, fellows are immersed in numerous topics, including leadership theory, effective communication, motivation, critical thinking, change management, emotional intelligence and other skills and tools that contribute to improved performance. Along with individualized leadership development coaching, fellows engage in situations and discussions focused on complex social and cultural issues. They are provided with opportunities to build enhanced critical thinking skills that, combined with a broader perspective, help graduates guide creative solutions throughout their lives.

    “For 55 years, the Ag Leadership Program has cultivated a remarkable legacy of growing leaders who make a difference,” said CALF President and CEO Dwight Ferguson. “Those in California agriculture who want to increase their leadership capacity and bolster their positive impact in agriculture, their communities and beyond are strongly encouraged to apply to Class 55.”

    The program includes approximately 55 days of formal program activities. CALF delivers an integrated, comprehensive and diverse curriculum with support from its four partner universities: Cal Poly Pomona, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Fresno State and UC Davis. Fellows learn from first-rate educators and subject authorities from many professions and backgrounds. As a valuable extension to the monthly seminars, fellows participate in national and international travel seminars that provide further opportunities to understand interconnected systems and governments, dialogue with policy leaders and compare and contrast cultural dynamics.

    CALF invests more than $50,000 per fellow to participate in the Ag Leadership Program, thanks in large part to donations made by individuals and industry organizations and companies. Candidates are strongly encouraged to talk with Ag Leadership alumni about the program and to attend an informational event.

    More information and the application are available at www.agleaders.org/class55apply/. Phase one of the three-phrase application process is due no later than April 1, 2025. Individuals are encouraged to complete the application as soon as possible.

    ABOUT
    CALF is dedicated to growing leadership in agriculturalists who have the capacity and potential to advance, benefit and promote California agriculture. Since 1970, more than 1,400 California Agricultural Leadership Program fellows have become lifelong leaders who individually and collectively act as a catalyst for a vibrant agricultural community and make a significant difference in the agricultural industry, their businesses, communities and families. agleaders.org

  • U.S. Dairy Exports Reach $8.2 Billion, Marking Second-Highest Level Ever—Industry Poised for a “Golden Age” of Trade

    The U.S. dairy industry is poised to establish a new “golden age” of U.S. dairy trade, with exports reaching $8.2 billion in 2024—the second-highest total export value ever and a $223 million year-over-year increase, according to new data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Mexico and Canada—U.S. dairy’s top two global trading partners representing more than 40% of U.S. dairy exports—each imported record values of dairy at $2.47 billion and $1.14 billion respectively. Central American markets also surged, with Costa Rica, Guatemala and El Salvador all importing record values of U.S. dairy. U.S. dairy exports to China declined in 2024, marking the lowest year since 2020.

    “The U.S. dairy industry is ready to capitalize on a renewed trade agenda in 2025,” said Michael Dykes, president and CEO, International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA). “Consumers in the United States and around the world continue to demand more U.S. dairy because we provide an assortment of delicious, nutritious and affordable dairy products. From award-winning cheeses, to high-value whey ingredients and milk powders used to make life-saving products for children and adults to safe and nutritious ESL milk, U.S. dairy is known throughout the world for quality and reliability.

    “Our industry is poised to become the world’s leading supplier of dairy products thanks to the resilience and innovation of the American dairy industry. To do that, we need a trade agenda that prioritizes market access and ensures a level playing field. For too long, our exports to Canada have yet to fulfill the promises of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) because Canadian policies continue to prevent American exporters from filling their tariff-rate quotas. Demand remains soft in key markets such as China and Southeast Asia, including the Philippines, Vietnam, and Malaysia, illustrating the need for a strategic approach to trade with markets in the Asia Pacific region. Overall, U.S. dairy exports are performing well, but we can do more. With new trade agreements that remove obstacles and increase market access, we wouldn’t just break records—we would redefine the global dairy landscape for decades to come.”

    The U.S. dairy industry, which supports more than 3.2 million jobs in the United States and pumps almost $800 billion into the U.S. economy, has invested more than $8 billion in new processing capacity that will come online in the next few years. The industry relies on trade agreements to open new markets and increase exports. After being a net importer of dairy products a decade ago, the United States now exports $8 billion worth of dairy products to 145 countries. U.S. dairy exports nearly tripled since the early 2000s, and the United States became the world’s third-largest dairy product exporter behind New Zealand and the European Union (EU). Today, approximately one day’s worth of milk produced on America’s dairy farms each week is exported, or roughly 18% of all production. As U.S. milk production continues to increase over the next decade, expanding markets will become even more vital to ensure the global competitiveness of the industry and to boost the American economy.

    The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA), Washington, D.C., represents the nation’s dairy manufacturing and marketing industry, which supports more than 3.2 million jobs that generate $49 billion in direct wages and $794 billion in overall economic impact. IDFA’s diverse membership ranges from multinational organizations to single-plant companies, from dairy companies and cooperatives to food retailers and suppliers, all on the cutting edge of innovation and sustainable business practices. Together, they represent most of the milk, cheese, ice cream, yogurt and cultured products, and dairy ingredients produced and marketed in the United States and sold throughout the world. Delicious, safe and nutritious, dairy foods offer unparalleled health and consumer benefits to people of all ages.

  • Tolerance of Lettuce Varieties to Fusarium Wilt – 2024

    Fusarium wilt of lettuce, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae (FOL), is an economically significant disease on the Central Coast of California.  We conducted field trials to evaluate 30 iceberg and 21 romaine varieties for tolerance to Fusarium wilt.  The trials were located in commercial fields in Greenfield, CA (wet date of May 27, 2024) and Salinas, CA (wet date of June 8, 2024).  Foliar disease severity was visually evaluated on July 31-August 2, 2024 at Greenfield and on August 5-7, 2024 at Salinas and converted to a marketability (yes or no) rating.  Disease pressure was high at both locations.  Iceberg varieties that exceeded 50% marketability at both locations were Powerball and two coded entries from Vilmorin-Mikado.  Nine varieties exceeded 50% marketability at Greenfield but not Salinas, and two varieties exceeded the same threshold at Salinas but not Greenfield.  For romaine, 19 out of 22 varieties exceeded 90% marketability at Greenfield, but only two of those varieties (Holbrook and Momentus) also exceeded the same threshold at Salinas.  In a greenhouse experiment, isolates from Greenfield showed a susceptible reaction on variety Costa Rica #4, which is consistent with the Costa Rica FOL race variant.  Although FOL race 1 is suspected to be present at the Salinas location, greenhouse testing is not complete.  These trials provide public data on the tolerance of iceberg and romaine varieties to Fusarium wilt.

    Methods

    Field trials were conducted in Greenfield, CA and Salinas, CA to evaluate both in-slot and out-of-slot varieties (30 iceberg and 21 romaine) for tolerance to Fusarium wilt in commercial fields with disease history.  At Greenfield, bed center spacing was 80 inches, and plots were 1 plant line wide by 100 ft. long.  Due to space constraints, 4 iceberg and 10 romaine varieties were not included in the Salinas trial.  At Salinas, bed center spacing was 40 inches, and plots were 1 plant lines wide by 40 ft. long.  Iceberg and romaine varieties were evaluated separately, and plots of each type were arranged in a randomized complete block with four replications.  Treatments were direct seeded using the grower-cooperators’ planters at Greenfield and using single-line push planters at Salinas.  The wet dates were May 27, 2024 for Greenfield and June 8, 2024 for Salinas.  The Greenfield trial was maintained to commercial standards for lettuce production, whereas the Salinas trial was not.  After thinning by commercial crews, 50 plants at Greenfield and 30 plants at Salinas in the center of each plot were counted, and the section was marked with stakes.  Data were collected from this center section.  Evaluations were performed on July 31-August 2 at Greenfield and August 5-7 at Salinas, which was before maturity at the Salinas trial.  Foliar disease severity was assessed on a 0 to 4 scale where: 0 = healthy; 1 = wilting or chlorosis of one to three outer leaves; 2 = up to moderate stunting and wilting or chlorosis of <25% of leaf area; 3 = head is severely stunted or absent and between 25% and 75% of leaf area is wilting or chlorotic; and 4 = head is absent and >75% of leaf area is chlorotic and nearly dead, or plant is entirely dead.  For analysis, foliar disease severity was converted to marketability, where: disease severity of 0 or 1 = marketable; and disease severity of 2, 3, or 4 = not marketable.  Marketability data was analyzed by an analysis of variance (< 0.05), and variety means were separated using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.

    Results – Race of the FOL pathogen present

    Two races of FOL are present on the Central Coast: race 1, and a novel race variant (Nayak et al., 2024).  We are using the temporary name “Costa Rica FOL variant” for the novel race variant until it is officially named following completion of the upcoming ring test, which is a collaborative experiment between researchers and seed companies.  To determine the FOL race present, isolates from each location were evaluated in a race typing experiment in the greenhouse.  Variety Costa Rica #4 showed a susceptible reaction to both Greenfield isolates, which supports the observation that the Costa Rica FOL race variant is present at the Greenfield location.  We suspect FOL race 1 is present at the Salinas location.  However, greenhouse testing of the Salinas location isolates is ongoing.

    Results – Marketability

    Disease pressure was high at both locations.  Iceberg varieties that exceeded 50% marketability at both locations were Powerball and two coded entries from Vilmorin-Mikado (Table 1).  Nine varieties exceeded 50% marketability at Greenfield only: Balboa, Fontinas, Meridian, Paraiso, San Andreas, San Miguel, two coded entries from Salinas Valley Seeds, and one coded entry from Sakata.  In contrast, two varieties exceeded the same threshold at Salinas only: Fredonia and a coded entry from Takii.  This pattern of some varieties showing large differences in performance between locations whereas others showed similar performance suggests that a different race is present at each location, but this has not yet been confirmed by greenhouse testing.

    Of the 21 romaine varieties evaluated, two varieties exceeded 90% marketability at both locations: Holbrook and Momentus (Table 2).  A total of 17 out of 21 varieties exceeded the same threshold at Greenfield but not Salinas.  At the Salinas location, Holbrook and Momentus were not statistically different from four varieties (Boronda, Copious, Patton, and Solid Heart) with average percent marketability ranging from 77% to 88%.

    If you have additional questions about these trials, please contact Alex Putman at 951-522-9556 or aiputman@ucr.edu.

    Please Send Us Samples

    We are continuing to collect samples of lettuce Fusarium wilt to determine the distribution of races and to monitor the pathogen. To support this research, please contact the person in your region. Your help would be greatly appreciated.

    • Monterey, San Benito, or Santa Cruz Counties – Yu-Chen Wang (831-201-9689 or yckwang@ucanr.edu)
    • San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, or Ventura Counties – Chris Greer (805-888-1355 or cagreer@ucanr.edu)
    • Any other California county – Alex Putman (951-522-9556 or aiputman@ucr.edu)

    Acknowledgements

    We are grateful to D’Arrigo Brothers Co. of California and an anonymous grower for the space and maintenance of the variety field trials.  We thank seed producers for providing seed for the trial. Funding for this project was made possible by a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the USDA.  Funding was also provided by the California Leafy Greens Research Program.

    References

    Nayak, S., K.L. Richardson, A.I. Putman, N.R. LeBlanc, F.N. Martin, N. Li, and J.D. McCreight. 2024. Detection of novel pathogenic variants of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae in California. Plant Pathology Early View. doi:10.1111/ppa.14019

  • Comprehensive List of Nitrogen Removal Coefficients for Crops Grown in Coastal California

    The Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB) approved Ag Order 4.0 in April of 2021. This regulatory action requires growers to calculate the quantity of nitrogen (N) that leaves their fields in harvested product. This value is needed to calculate the metric applied (A) minus removed (R) nitrogen (A-R) which indicates the amount of N that remains in the field over the season and is considered the load of N at risk for nitrate leaching to groundwater resources that municipalities rely upon for drinking water. In Table 1 crop removal coefficients are provided for 75 crops and crop products. They include the larger acreage vegetable crops such as lettuce and broccoli as well as smaller acreage crops such as summer squash, green beans and Asian vegetables. Given the large number of species, gerberas (no foliage on the stem) and snap dragons (foliage on the stem) were evaluated as representative flower crops. Growers producing different flower crops can substitute gerberas or snap dragons to supply the N removal estimate of their crops.

    The crop removal coefficient is multiplied by the total weight of harvested product to provide an estimate of the pounds of N that are removed from the field. This information can then be used to report N removal from production fields to the CCRWQCB.

    For instance, in the case of whole heads of bulk romaine lettuce which in this example has a net* yield of 36,000 lbs/acre:

    36,000 lbs harvested product/acre x 0.00149 = 53.6 lbs of N/acre removed

    *subtract box weight from gross weight.

    N removal coefficients were determined by multiplying the percent moisture content of the harvested product by its total N content. We worked with harvest crews to get freshly harvested products and immediately measured the moisture content. The samples were then dried and sent to the UC Davis Analytical Lab for total N content. We collected 4 to 6 samples per field from at least 10 to 15 production fields with diverse soil types, production practices and growing conditions (see Table 1 for exact number of fields sampled for each commodity), and as a result, there is variability around the mean values which is shown in Table 1.

    Coefficients tend to be higher for commodities with high N content and high percent solids. The CCRWQCB allows growers to use different coefficients if they can justify their use; and growers can also develop their own coefficients using CCRWQCB guidelines. However, N removal coefficients for a given crop will tend to fall in certain ranges. For instance, high N content leafy vegetables will have higher coefficients that will tend to vary from 0.005 to 0.006. Head vegetables tended to range from 0.002 to 0.003. So, although coefficients may vary to some degree, they will tend to fall within certain ranges.  In the above example if the maximum coefficient of 0.00166 was used for bulk romaine, the increase in the estimate of N removal would only be about 6 lbs N/acre (59.8 lbs N/acre removed).  — By Richard Smith, UCCE Monterey County, Michael Cahn, UCCE Monterey County, Aparna Gazula, UCCE Santa Clara County, Daniel Geisseler, UC Davis, and Andre Biscaro, UCCE Ventura County

    Table 1. Mean and range of crop coefficients (coeff) developed by this FREP funded project and additional crops evaluated. Factors used to develop the coefficients are also included: percent dry matter (%DM) and percent nitrogen (%N)

  • Difficult Weed Stinknet Spreads Across the West

    Stinknet (Oncosiphon pilulifer) is an annual weed spreading aggressively in the southwestern US. This species was first found in North America the early 1980’s in Southern California and it continues to spread aggressively in California and Arizona and a few populations have been found in Nevada. It is expected to spread beyond these areas. With the above average rainfall in Southern California in the winters of 2023 and 2024 numerous new stinknet populations have been discovered recently. Some have been adjacent to areas where stinknet was previously found and it’s also been discovered in other areas that are far from known stinknet populations. We’ve also created a UC IPM pest note for managing stinknet that can be helpful as you build your IPM program for your lands.

    https://ipm.ucanr.edu/natural-area-pests/stinknet/#gsc.tab=0

    While it is somewhat easy to control individual stinknet plants, it is especially challenging to control stinknet patches or populations and to eradicate new infestations. The biology of stinknet makes it difficult to control populations for many reasons.

    First, stinknet has a highly variable size. Plants growing under poor conditions can be less than 6 inches tall, skinny, with just a few flowers at the end of the season. On the other hand, plants growing in optimal conditions can be 3 feet tall and wide with hundreds to even a few thousand flowers. It can be difficult to find all the stinknet plants in a population just due to the large differences in size between plants. It may also be difficult to find a few skinny stinknet plants growing among other vegetation.

    Second, stinknet re-sprouts after being cut. When cut or mowed during the growing season it can grow back. Which means, if using mowing as a control technique, it often takes multiple cuttings to control stinknet and in some cases after repeated cuttings the plants will grow low to the ground and still flower. Cutting closer to the surface is more helpful, but plants can still resprout from a low cut. This resprouting can occur also after using contact herbicides, such as organic herbicides, because established plants can grow out of these burn down treatments.

    Third, stinknet seedlings can grow in very dense clusters. Unlike some other weed species, stinknet seedlings can grow in dense clusters including up to 15 seedlings per square inch of soil surface. When plants are growing in such dense clusters it may be difficult to treat each individual plants. When trying to apply herbicides to each individual plant to control them all, it may take multiple treatments throughout the season to ensure applications reach each individual.

    Fourth, stinknet can germinate several times each year after fall winter or spring rains. In a single population of stinknet plants there may be several cohorts including large plants nearing maturity that germinated early in the season, others that are in early flowering stage, others that are medium sized and a few that may be seedlings.

    Fifth, before stinknet flowers it can be difficult to find. Early in the season stinknet is relatively small, grows low to the ground, and is often shorter than surrounding annual plants, including annual grasses. Just being one of the shorter plants makes it hard to search through taller vegetation to find. When stinknet is taller during flowering or near flowering it can be much easier to find, but then it might be too late in the season to muster effective control techniques.

    And sixth, and related to the last point, stinknet can be difficult to identify. The flowers are distinct round, globe-shaped yellow balls and when blooming can be a very easy and great way to identify stinknet. If you are not very familiar with this plant or where it might be located on your lands, it is highly recommended to monitor for stinknet in the early flowering season. However, before stinknet begins to flower, it is difficult to identify. The leaves are relatively small, they are finely divided (doubly pinnate), and are covered in fine hairs. There are many plants that look similarly at these early stages. The leaves do have a strong pungent odor, even when small, so using your nose can help to identify stinknet if you have an unknown small weed with slightly hairy, finely divided leaves.

    As mentioned earlier, to help control stinknet we’ve developed a stinkent pest note. This pest note details much of the current information on managing stinknet. The pest note covers how to identify stinknet, its biology and impacts in the environment, developing monitoring programs for stinknet, and covers the known successful management methods for stinknet, including nonchemical and chemical control methods and including a few options we have learned that are not effective.

    We are learning more and more about this species and trying new methods, as well as fine tuning successful methods to try to control it. — By Chris McDonald, UCANR