Category: Pest/Disease Management

  • Huanglongbing Quarantine Boundary Expands in Riverside, San Diego Counties

    Effective July 29, the Department is expanding the HLB quarantine boundary in the Fallbrook and Rainbow areas of San Diego County and into Riverside County (grids 499 and 500). A map of the expanded boundary can be found at https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/citrus/pests_diseases/hlb/regulation.html.

    Also effective July 29, the Department is expanding the Asian Citrus Psyllid Bulk Citrus Regional Quarantine Zone 6 in the both areas to reflect the HLB quarantine boundary expansion. A map of the expanded boundary can be found at https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/citrus/pests_diseases/acp/regulation.html.

    Regulated articles and conditions for intrastate movement under the quarantine can be found at Title 3 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) section 3435 & 3439. Pursuant to 3 CCR § 3435 &3439, any interested party or local entity may appeal a quarantine area designation.

    Process to Appeal the Expanded Boundary

    The appeal must be submitted to the Department in writing and supported by clear and convincing evidence. The appeal must be filed no later than ten (10) working days from the date of this notification. During the pending of the appeal, the designated quarantine boundary under appeal shall remain in effect.

    Mail Appeals to: CDFA — Citrus Division 1220 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814

    Electronic Notification of Boundary Changes

    California Code of Regulation allows interested parties to be notified of quarantine area boundary changes, as well as the opportunity to submit quarantine boundary appeals. If interested in receiving notifications, please sign up for regulatory updates through the email notification at: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/CADFA/subscriber/new

    For questions regarding the regulations or map, email Raymond Niem (Raymond.Niem@cdfa.ca.gov) or call 916.274.6300.

    Story contributed to the California Department of Food and Agriculture

  • Leading Entomologist and PCA: How to Control Navel Orangeworm and Aflatoxin

    How can almond, pistachio, and walnut growers control navel orangeworm and reduce aflatoxin risk? UC Cooperative Extension entomologist Houston Wilson joins pistachio and almond grower and pest control adviser (PCA) Joe Coelho and Arielle O’Connor of the Arizona Cotton Research & Protection Council to discuss practical strategies for preventing infestations, limiting crop damage, and reducing the effects of aflatoxin.

    Presented by title sponsor Liphatech and premier sponsor the Arizona Cotton Research & Protection Council.

    Learn more about postharvest fumigation at https://liphatech.com/

  • USDA Announces $35 Million to Combat Feral Pigs

    The USDA is making $35 million available for partnerships to counter the threat feral swine pose to American agriculture, landscapes and human and livestock health. This partnership opportunity is part of a broader $105 million investment for the Feral Swine Eradication and Control Pilot Program, where USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) are working together to target feral swine.

    “We are collaborating with our partners at USDA and across the country to help combat feral swine and keep our farms, ranches and landscapes safe,” said NRCS Chief Colton L. Buckley. “These invasive species cause more than $3.4 billion in damage each year, including damage to agricultural landscapes. Thanks to the Working Families Tax Cuts Act, NRCS is able to expand this effort, giving producers and partners more resources to protect working lands and strengthen the long-term resilience of agricultural operations.”

    The Working Families Tax Cuts Act delivers the largest long-term investment in NRCS conservation programs in decades, including support for this program.  It continued the program for another five years with the $105 million total investment split between NRCS and APHIS, including the $35 million made available through this announcement.

    Partners are invited to apply for feral swine eradication and control projects in the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas.

    About the Pilot Program

    Feral swine can have significant negative impacts on plant and wildlife habitats, soils, water quality, as well as other natural resources. Livestock and humans are also susceptible to diseases carried by feral swine.

    Partners selected to participate in the Feral Swine Eradication and Control Pilot Program will provide landowner assistance for restoration and on-farm trapping efforts and provide related services, like training. Funding for these services will be provided through grant agreements between partners and NRCS.

    All projects will be a collaborative and coordinated effort among the selected partner, NRCS, and APHIS.

    Applications will be accepted until Sept. 21 at 11:59 p.m. EST. For more information about this funding opportunity and to apply, visit the notice of funding on Grants.gov.

    Story contributed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture

  • LGMA Webinar Highlights Science-Based Strategies for Preventing Cyclospora

    Hundreds of produce industry professionals from across the supply chain participated today in a public webinar hosted by the California and Arizona Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement (LGMA) to learn what is currently known—and what remains unknown—about Cyclospora and the steps growers, shippers and buyers can take to reduce risk.

    During the webinar, food safety expert Dr. Jennifer McEntire, founder of Food Safety Strategies and former Chief Food Safety and Regulatory Officer for the International Fresh Produce Association, emphasized three key messages:

    • Testing is not the answer. Current methods for detecting Cyclospora in fresh produce or water are technically challenging, have significant limitations and should not be relied upon as a preventive food safety strategy.
    • Focus on proven preventative practices. Buyers should verify that suppliers are fully complying with the mandatory food safety requirements of the California and Arizona Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement, the FDA Produce Safety Rule, or equivalent science-based food safety standards in their country of origin.
    • More research is needed. While significant progress has been made in understanding Cyclospora, important questions remain regarding how the parasite enters the production environment and the most effective methods for preventing contamination.

    “So much confusion and misinformation has been circulating about the current Cyclospora outbreak,” said California LGMA President and CEO Tim York, President. “Our goal was to bring together the best available science and provide the produce industry with practical, evidence-based information they can use today. Dr. McEntire is one of the nation’s leading experts on produce safety, and we wanted to make her expertise as widely available as possible.”

    York noted that a recording of the webinar is available on the California and Arizona LGMA website for anyone unable to attend the live presentation.  Story contributed by the California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement

  • DPR Releases Findings from Fumigant Alternatives Study

    The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) released the fourth and final component of a multi-part study exploring alternatives to fumigant pesticides. The last report focused on the risks and benefits of pre-plant fumigants.

    The research conducted by the California Council on Science and Technology (CCST) specifically looked at methyl bromide and three pesticides known as MITC generators – dazomet, metam-sodium, and metam-potassium. Similar to the findings from CCST’s previous reports, this report found that, while alternatives exist, there is no single alternative that can be used as a 1:1 substitute for methyl bromide or MITC generators. In particular, the cost and effectiveness of alternatives remain a significant barrier for growers. More crop- and region-specific research is needed to determine the efficacy of alternatives at commercial scale.

    “DPR has made a strong commitment to sustainable pest management and finding alternatives to fumigants,” said DPR Director Karen Morrison. “We will continue to prioritize actions to protect human health and the environment through research and innovation.”

    Both methyl bromide and MITC generators are restricted material pesticides in California – a group of high-risk pesticides that are strictly regulated to protect public health and the environment.

    Methyl bromide is a soil fumigant that has been largely phased out of use in routine agriculture under the Montreal Protocol because of its ozone-depleting properties. The U.S. EPA only allows its use in a few circumstances – primarily for quarantine and pre-shipment of commodities, imported goods, and nursery propagation to prevent the introduction and/or spread of pests across borders. MITC generators are used to protect timber from rot and to reduce the spread of soil-borne pests between crop seasons.

    DPR commissioned the independent study following the release of the Sustainable Pest Management (SPM) Roadmap to evaluate fumigant use and existing alternatives with funding from the California Budget Act of 2023-24. CCST’s reports focused on soil fumigants 1,3-D and chloropicrin, alternatives to sulfuryl fluoride, and post-harvest commodity fumigation.

    DPR has also created two new committees to support implementation of the SPM Roadmap.

    • The SPM Advisory Committee advises DPR on goals, tactics, policies, and partnerships that support the implementation of SPM statewide.
    • The Scientific Prioritization and Review Committee (SPARC) will provide science-based recommendations to inform DPR’s transparent, data-driven process for identifying and addressing potential risks to human health and the environment from pesticide use.

    DPR is also prioritizing alternatives to fumigants in its annual pool of SPM grant funding. For example, in May, DPR awarded over $600,000 to a project to evaluate the application of different combinations of soil fumigant alternatives.

  • Fourth Annual Organic Field Day Returning to Cal Poly on July 23

    The Grimm Family Center for Organic Production and Research at California Polytechnic State University will host its Fourth Annual Organic Field Day on Thursday, July 23, 2026, at Cal Poly’s Organic Sandbox on Highland Ave. The free event is open to the public and designed for farmers, agricultural professionals, students, and anyone interested in organic agriculture.

    The Organic Field Day offers attendees hands-on access to ongoing student-led research in organic nutrient and pest management, a workshop with the Coalition for Food Safety and Sustainability, and a discussion of trap crops for flea beetles and cucumber beetles. Participants can expect guided field tours, live demonstrations, and direct conversations with Cal Poly researchers and faculty working on practical solutions for organic producers.

    “The Grimm Organic Center Field Day is an opportunity to see the next generation of

    agricultural innovation in action. Attendees will hear directly from Cal Poly students researching soil health and pest management while engaging with experts on practical topics, including trap cropping, food safety, and sustainability. Whether you’re a grower, advisor, student, or industry professional, you’ll leave with ideas and connections that can be applied immediately.” — Matthew Grieshop, Director of the Grimm Family Center for Organic Production and Research (mgriesho@calpoly.edu)

    “The Grimm Organic Center Field Day is a great event with educational sessions on key topics that are critical for organic farming – organic nutrient management, organic pest and disease management, and understanding soil health. These sessions are all presented by Cal Poly students involved in conducting the research. I believe the information presented will be of interest to the whole organic farming community.” — Ramy Colfer, True Organic Products (rcolfer@true.ag)

    The event follows the Strawberry Center Field Day, also held on July 23 at Cal Poly. Attendees should register for each event separately.

    Registration is free and open to all. Registration and sponsorship links can be found at

    organic.calpoly.edu/field-day-2026

    Event Details

    Date: Thursday, July 23, 2026

    Time: 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM, immediately following the Strawberry Center Field Day.

    Location: Cal Poly Organic Sandbox, Highland Ave., Cal Poly campus.

    Free Event Parking: H1 Lot, Mount Bishop Rd.

    Cost: Free and open to the public.

    For more information, please email Matthew Grieshop, director of the Grimm Family Center for Organic Production and Research, at mgriesho@calpoly.edu, or visit organic.calpoly.edu/field-day-2026. — Story contributed by the Grimm Family Center for Organic Production and Research

  • Study Finds California Wolves Feed Heavily on Cattle

    Two new studies examining gray wolves in California paint a complex picture of life on California’s ranching landscapes: wolves eat cattle more than anything else and the presence of the predators causes significant stress among livestock.

    In the first study, UC Davis researchers found wolves from the Lassen and Harvey packs in northeastern California were primarily eating cattle. They collected scat samples during the summer months of 2022 and 2023 and found 72% of wolf scat contained cattle DNA. The research was published in PLOS One.

    “Whether it’s through scavenging or whether it’s through depredation, it’s a huge component of the wolves’ diet,” said lead author Tina Saitone, a professor of Cooperative Extension in the UC Davis Agricultural and Resource Economics Department. “Their conservation success is because of livestock producers in the state.”

    Cattle appeared as the most frequently occurring food item during both summers of the study, present in 86% of samples in 2022 and 55% in 2023. While all 2022 samples were from the Lassen Pack, the 2023 samples included eight from the newly established Harvey Pack.

    Wolves are a state and federally recognized endangered species. The first confirmed wolf entered California in 2011, following a nearly 100-year absence. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife estimates the state is now home to nine wolf packs.

    Few Natural Prey

    Wolves in California live in landscapes shaped by people. They have fewer wild ungulate prey options than wolves in other parts of North America. Mule deer are their only significant wild food source, but populations have dropped sharply since the 1970s.

    Saitone said the scarcity of wild prey may be one reason wolves are eating cattle instead. Researchers found mule deer in just 45% of the scat samples, significantly less common than cattle.

    Keeping wolves away from cattle is difficult on many of these working landscapes.

    “Conservatively, we’re talking about a million acres in our study area and 10,000 cow-calf pairs,” said Saitone. “It’s not as simple as putting up an electric fence on a two-acre pasture or putting cattle in the barn at night.”

    Cattle are stressed

    Researchers also examined how living among wolves affects cattle. Their findings suggest the costs of wolf reintroduction extend well beyond animals lost to predation.

    A second study, published in Ecology and Evolution, measured cortisol levels in tail hair samples collected from beef cattle grazing rangelands in northeastern California — some herds sharing territory with wolf packs, others in areas without wolves. Cortisol, often called the stress hormone, accumulates in hair over time, making it a reliable indicator of chronic stress rather than a momentary response to fright.

    Cattle herds living among wolves had cortisol levels 58% higher than those in control herds — a significant physiological difference. This marks one of the first times hair cortisol analysis has been used to study how the reintroduction of predators reshapes livestock physiology in the field.

    “What this really confirms is that death or depredation is not the only impact here,” said Saitone. “Living among wolves for cattle is a chronically stressful experience, and that could ultimately have production-related impacts in both the short and the long term.”

    Could it Affect Reproduction?

    Saitone said the findings are just a starting point. Researchers next want to understand whether elevated stress levels translate into lower conception rates. It’s a concern long raised by ranchers that has not yet been established through direct biological evidence. When breeding cows fail to conceive, it can directly affect a rancher’s bottom line.

    “That’s their whole purpose,” said Saitone. “These are mother cows that are supposed to be generating calves as a marketable product.”

    Other authors of the PLOS One study include Kenneth W. Tate and Benjamin J. Sacks of UC Davis. Funding came from the Russell L. Rustici Rangeland and Cattle Research Endowment and California Cattle Council.

    Christina Nord was corresponding author of the Ecology and Evolution study. Other authors include Alexander Pritchard, Rosemary A. Blersch, Brenda McCowan, Jessica J. Vandeleest and Kenneth W. Tate. Funding came from Western Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education and the Russell L. Rustici Rangeland and Cattle Research Endowment. — Story by Amy Quinton, UC Davis

  • Mediterranean Fruit Fly Quarantine in Santa Clara, Alameda Counties Over

    Effective July 8, 2026 the CDFA is removing the MedFly quarantine located in Santa Clara and Alameda counties. Maps of any remaining MedFly quarantine boundaries can be found at www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/medfly/regulation.html.

    Regulated articles and conditions for intrastate movement under the quarantine can be found at Title 3 California Code of Regulations (CCR) section 3406. Pursuant to Title 3 CCR section 3406 any interested party or local entity may appeal a quarantine area designation.

    Process to Appeal the Area Boundaries

    The appeal must be submitted to the Department in writing and supported by clear and convincing evidence. The appeal must be filed no later than ten (10) working days from the date of this notification. During the pending of the appeal, the designated Quarantine Boundary under appeal shall remain in effect.

    Mail Appeals to:
    CDFA – Pest Exclusion
    1220 N St., Room 221
    Sacramento, CA  95814

    Electronic Notification of Boundary Changes

    California Code of Regulation allows interested parties to be notified of quarantine area boundary changes, as well as the opportunity to submit quarantine boundary appeals. If interested in receiving notifications, please sign up for regulatory updates through the email notification list at: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/CADFA/subscriber/new

    For questions regarding the regulations or map, please email Vince Arellano at vince.arellano@cdfa.ca.gov or call 916-654-0312.

  • How to Control Vineyard Ants and Vine Mealybug

    George Zhuang, UC Cooperative Extension Specialist, and Manuel Marin Jr, PCA and California Raisin Grower, discuss some of the best practices for controlling ants and vine mealybug in your vineyard. Key takeaways include improved vineyard monitoring practices, specific methods of ant and Vine Mealybug control, and new ideas to bring home to your farm.

    Special thanks to Bayer Movento Insecticide for making this episode possible.

  • Bettiga Retires After 41 Years As UC Cooperative Extension Advisor

    One of the crowning achievements of Larry Bettiga’s nearly half-century academic career can be found — creased, cut up and dog-eared — in the trucks of grape growers all across California.

    Bettiga, the UC Cooperative Extension viticulture advisor for Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz counties, was the driving force behind the third edition of “Grape Pest Management.” Published in 2013 by UC Ag and Natural Resources, the book is widely regarded as the definitive reference on the subject.

    “I can probably contact a dozen grape growers here in the Central Valley and probably at least 10 of them have that book in their truck,” said Stephen Vasquez, a former UCCE viticulture advisor for Fresno and Madera counties.

    Aside from distilling Bettiga’s own knowledge, the book includes the input of more than 60 experts. The enthusiastic contributions of so many experts across academia and industry are testament to Bettiga’s standing in the field.

    “There is so much valuable information that went into that, and it would have only come together under someone like Larry Bettiga,” said Vasquez, who currently serves as the executive director of the Administrative Committee for Pistachios and the California Pistachio Research Board.

    Bettiga regards the book as a highlight of his long and influential career because it represents an aspect of extension he has always cherished — the teamwork.

    “I think what I’m most proud of is I’ve had the ability to work with a lot of people over the course of my career,” Bettiga explained. “And some of most satisfying projects have been where I developed a team to address a problem.”

    Bettiga’s Academic Journey from Pest Management to Grape Research

    The importance of working together is in Bettiga’s blood. He is descended from a closeknit clan of dairymen in Italy’s Lake Como region who had grazed their herds in the Alps and emigrated to Monterey County in the early 1900s. Bettiga grew up on his great-uncle’s dairy farm north of Salinas, where his father worked in the family business.

    After graduating from UC Berkeley in 1978 with a bachelor’s degree in agricultural pest management, he landed an internship in Tulare County, where he was supervised by UCCE advisors Steve Sibbitt and Donald Flaherty, a pioneer in grape pest management.

    “I had the opportunity at the time to work with all the advisors in the office,” Bettiga recalled, “and so I was also exposed to field crops and the whole range of what they were working on; they were very impressive in their approaches to solving grower problems, and they included me in all the things they were doing.”

    Bettiga then worked as a staff research associate on various projects, such as monitoring lepidopterous pests of grapes like omnivorous leaf roller and validating the codling moth model for walnuts.

    By that time, he was singularly focused on becoming a UCCE farm advisor so he leaped at the chance to become an SRA in the lab of Fred Jensen, the UCCE viticulture specialist at UC Kearney Research and Extension Center in Parlier.

    “He had a history where everybody who became his SRA later became a farm advisor,” said Bettiga, citing his close friend, the late George Leavitt, as just one example.

    Unsurprisingly, after four years of learning from Jensen the cultural practices for table grapes and also completing his master’s degree in viticulture at California State University, Fresno, Bettiga was hired in 1985 as the UCCE viticulture advisor in Monterey County. Fortunate to “come home” to work in his chosen profession, Bettiga has served in that position ever since.

    Phylloxera control, rootstock and clonal trials among Bettiga’s contributions

    When Bettiga started as a UCCE  advisor in his home region, many vineyards were infested with phylloxera, an insect that feeds and lays eggs on the roots of grapevines. At that time, most of the plants were “own rooted” (for example, a Chardonnay variety would be on Chardonnay roots), making them susceptible to the devastating pest. Therefore, the solution was grafting the wine grapevines to the resistant rootstocks of related species.

    But the scale of replanting an entire industry was daunting – and the farmers had no idea what rootstocks to plant. So Bettiga began a thorough program of rootstock trials to identify the best choices.

    “Over the course of the 10 to 15 years that it took to replant all these properties as they got infested, there was a lot of change,” Bettiga recalled.

    Bettiga and his collaborators were at the forefront of much of that change. They conducted studies to help growers optimize trellising, vineyard spacing, pest management, canopy management and the broad transition from sprinklers to drip irrigation in the region.

    “Larry conducted groundbreaking research on many aspects of wine grape production such as control of powdery mildew, vine training, rootstock evaluations, mealy bug control and many, many other production issues,” said Richard Smith, UCCE emeritus farm advisor for Monterey County. “Larry has been very practical in his approach to research and extension.”

    Another major contribution has been Bettiga’s systematic evaluation of clones of different varieties to improve productivity and fruit quality.

    “When we plan a vineyard now, we know a lot more than we did 40 years ago,” Bettiga said. “Forty years ago, people just said, ‘Give me whatever.’  And now everybody wants to have a clone that produces the type of wines they’re looking for, or the flavors they’re looking for; they want certain root stocks that are really matched to the site.”

    “Hopefully a lot of the work I did has helped those growers, at least locally, fine-tune and make decisions based on science,” Bettiga continued, “rather than on what they hear at coffee shops or see on the internet.”

    Bettiga, who also served as a UC Cooperative Extension county director during his career, has been a role model for other advisors. Just as he learned from iconic UCCE researchers such Fred Jensen and Pete Christensen, Bettiga passed forward the techniques of “forensic viticulturalists” who sleuth out the causes of growers’ most vexing challenges.

    Stephen Vasquez said the example of Bettiga and his colleagues served as a guide when he became the new advisor succeeding Christensen.

    “After year one, it was really like year three for me, and after year three, it was like year seven; being around them really accelerated my knowledge in viticulture and my ability to approach problems,” said Vasquez, who added that he, Bettiga and George Leavitt regularly lunched with Fred Jensen to talk shop until Jensen’s passing in 2012.

    Growers Valued Bettiga’s Calm Demeanor, Tireless Search for Solutions

    Countless farmers in the Monterey region and beyond have relied on Bettiga’s advice over the decades.

    “He had this ability to work with people who had thousands of acres, down to people who had two acres — he does his best for all of them, and that’s a trait that some people just don’t have,” said W.B. “Butch” Lindley, a longtime grower of wine grapes and other crops in the area.

    Since starting in the wine business in the 1970s, Lindley said he has looked to Bettiga for guidance on everything from the best variety to plant in a specific location to the best type of plastic netting for protecting a vineyard.

    “I don’t think I ever presented him with a problem where he would say, ‘Oh, well, I don’t know anything about it. You have to talk to somebody else.’ That just wasn’t his style,” said Lindley. “He was always ready to roll up his sleeves and dig into it.”

    Lindley also praised Bettiga’s calm confidence — a steadying influence needed more than ever. Noting that he has taken out 1,000 acres of grapevines in the last six months, Lindley said the wine industry is currently a “full-blown wreck” as demand plummets and production costs skyrocket.

    While holding hope that consumers will eventually return to wine in the future, Bettiga observed that rapid advances in mechanization should help with the labor issue. He said machines can now thin shoots and pull leaves just as well as human hands.

    “We’re able to do things mechanically that one could not have even dreamt of 40 years ago,” Bettiga explained. “So now it’s a question of how you adapt all this new technology to improve the overall farm and make it more efficient.”

    Bettiga Awarded Highest Honor by Viticulture and Enology Professional Organization

    Bettiga is also placing faith in the next generation of farm advisors and viticulturalists to meet the persistent challenges of emerging pests and fungal diseases and water scarcity in the region. He chuckled remembering how he was once the “young guy” in the Cooperative Extension office, and now he is the senior member of the team amid a generational transition.

    “We’ve got a lot of young advisors, especially here in Monterey County,” he said. “Hopefully my position will be refilled at some point and there’ll be another advisor here and they will thrive.”

    He also expects his successor will update the “Grape Pest Management” book for its fourth edition. Bettiga noted that a “high point” of his career was contributing to all three editions. As an intern, he had “minor input” in the first edition that came out in 1981. As a UCCE farm advisor, he wrote extensively for the second edition of 1992. And for the latest edition, published in 2013, he served as technical editor, following in the footsteps of Don Flaherty — one of his first mentors in the field.

    Another full circle moment came last year, when he was honored with the Merit Award by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture at ASEV’s conference, held on his home turf in Monterey. It is the same award that was bestowed in 2001 on Fred Jensen, the influential researcher who helped launch his career.

    The award recognizes Bettiga’s lifetime of achievement in the field and his legacy of groundbreaking research and innovative extension program. Bettiga has been instrumental in promoting integrated pest management approaches, encouraging growers to consider the broader environmental impacts of their operations, and championing sustainability in all aspects of Central Coast agriculture from soil health to people management.

    “It’s not just one thing, it’s the whole system that you look at,” Bettiga said. “That’s been a big change; if you jump back 40 years and told people about sustainability they’d probably kick you off the ranch — but now it’s just common, and everybody is trying to achieve that.”

    Aiming to continue his life’s work, Bettiga has applied for emeritus status with UC ANR. Lindley was glad to hear Bettiga will remain involved in the industry, as he will continue to call on him for advice.

    “Larry will be very difficult to replace,” Lindley said. “There are not very many Larry Bettigas in the world.”

    Story by UC Ag and Natural Resources