Category: Pest/Disease Management

  • Precision Timing Critical for Managing Hull Rot

    With this season’s hull rot treatment window now behind growers, recent research shared by UCCE advisors offers timely guidance for evaluating disease pressure this year and planning more precise management decisions next season. Hull rot remains one of the more frustrating and yield-limiting diseases in California almonds, particularly because its full impact is not always visible in the year it occurs. The research is helping clarify where growers should focus their efforts, especially as the disease complex evolves and growing conditions continue to favor new pathogens.

    Mohammad Yaghmour, orchard systems advisor in Kern County, has been closely tracking changes in the organisms responsible for hull rot. While the disease has long been associated with Rhizopus stolonifer and Monilinia species, the increasing presence of Aspergillus niger is shifting both how the disease develops and how it needs to be managed in the orchard.

    Hull rot follows a classic disease triangle, requiring a susceptible host, a pathogen, and the right environmental conditions. What makes this disease particularly challenging is that all three components are often present at hull split, when almonds are physiologically vulnerable and environmental conditions can favor fungal growth. Infection begins in the hull, but the most damaging effects appear later as the fungus moves into the fruiting wood. Leaves surrounding infected nuts dry rapidly, and the spurs that would produce next year’s crop are killed. In severe cases, entire shoots can be lost.

    This delayed impact is critical. Yield losses are not just tied to visible infection but to the loss of next year’s bearing wood. Research conducted across multiple orchards showed that yield reductions become meaningful once strike levels reach roughly one hundred per tree. At that point, the cumulative loss of spurs begins to reduce the productive capacity of the tree in the following season.

    One of the most important takeaways from this work is that not all hull rot is the same. Each pathogen behaves differently and requires different management timing. Monilinia, which also causes brown rot during bloom, infects earlier and must be managed weeks before hull split. In contrast, both Rhizopus and Aspergillusare primarily driven by inoculum originating in the soil, and infections occur at or shortly after hull split.

    The rise of Aspergillus niger is particularly important for growers in warmer production areas. This pathogen thrives under higher temperatures and has become increasingly common in Kern County before spreading more broadly across the Central Valley. Its symptoms differ subtly from those of Rhizopus. Instead of the gray, fuzzy growth commonly associated with Rhizopus, Aspergillus produces darker, flatter, jet-black spores. It can also lead to internal damage, including black streaking in wood due to toxin production, which contributes to spur and shoot death.

    Understanding when infection occurs has helped refine management recommendations. Research shows that almonds are most susceptible during early hull opening, particularly when the split is still narrow. That window—when the hull has just begun to open—is where infection severity is often highest for Aspergillus. This underscores why spray timing is so critical. Missing that narrow window can significantly reduce the effectiveness of control measures.

    Variety also plays a role. Nonpareil, Butte, and Sonora have shown higher susceptibility, while Monterey and Fritz tend to be less affected under similar conditions. In mixed plantings, this means growers should expect greater risk in Nonpareil blocks and manage accordingly, prioritizing inputs where the return on protection is highest.

    Cultural practices continue to play an essential role in reducing disease pressure. Excess nitrogen has been shown to increase susceptibility, likely by promoting lush growth that favors infection. Careful nitrogen management can reduce that risk. You can learn more about nitrogen management at Almonds.org/NutrientManagement. Similarly, irrigation practices influence disease development. Strategic deficit irrigation has been linked to reduced incidence of Rhizopus, while excessive soil moisture during hull split can increase disease pressure.

    Dust management is another overlooked but important factor. Because Aspergillus and Rhizopus originate in the soil, any activity that creates dust can move spores into the canopy. Equipment traffic during hull split can unintentionally increase inoculum pressure at the exact time tissues are most vulnerable. Reducing dust during this period can help limit infection.

    Fungicides remain a valuable tool, but they are not a standalone solution. Their effectiveness depends heavily on correct timing and proper pathogen identification. Materials in several FRAC groups have shown strong performance when applied at the early stages of hull split. However, applying them too early or too late significantly reduces their value. In most cases, hull split sprays for disease management can be aligned with navel orangeworm treatments, helping to streamline operations.

    For growers, the message is clear: while the opportunity for in-season treatment may have passed, hull rot management is less about any single treatment and more about matching the right tool to the right moment. By using this season’s observations to scout for disease pressure, identify the pathogen involved and plan ahead for precise spray timing, balanced nitrogen, careful irrigation and dust reduction, growers can better protect the fruiting wood that supports next year’s crop and build more resilient orchard systems over time. — Story contributed by the Almond Board of California

  • California Growers Have a New Enemy That’s Spreading Fast

    Golden Mussels have been a silent threat California growers since they arrived in the Delta in 2024. These mollusks reproduce at an alarming rate and don’t require saltwater, meaning they are now clogging up irrigation systems and depriving crops of an already scarce water supply. Jason McKee from Greenleaf Ag spoke with Matthew Malcolm from Malcolm Media Ag Publishing to discuss this latest threat to orchards. Watch this quick video and learn more in Pacific Nut Producer Magazine.

  • Citrus Yellow Vein Clearing Virus Quarantine Boundary Expanded

    Effective Aug. 14, the CDFA is expanding the citrus yellow vein clearing virus (CYVCV quarantine) in the Lodi area of San Joaquin County (grids 180 and 191). A map of the expanded boundary can be found at https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/citrus/pests_diseases/cyvcv/regulation.html.

    Regulated articles and conditions for intrastate movement under the quarantine can be found at Title 3 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) section 3447. Pursuant to 3 CCR §3447, any interested party or local entity may appeal a quarantine area designation.

    Process to Appeal the Expanded Boundary

    The appeal must be submitted to the Department in writing and supported by clear and convincing evidence. The appeal must be filed no later than ten (10) working days from the date of this notification. During the pending of the appeal, the designated quarantine boundary under appeal shall remain in effect.

    Mail Appeals to: CDFA – Citrus Division 1220 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814

    Electronic Notification of Boundary Changes

    California Code of Regulation allows interested parties to be notified of quarantine area boundary changes, as well as the opportunity to submit quarantine boundary appeals. If interested in receiving notifications, please sign up for regulatory updates through the email notification at: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/CADFA/subscriber/new.

    For questions regarding the regulations or map, please email Raymond Niem (Raymond.Niem@cdfa.ca.gov) or call 916-274-6300. — Story contributed by the California Department of Food and Ag

  • Project in Santa Cruz Co. Explores Alternative to Soil Fumigation

    The Santa Cruz County Agricultural Commissioner (CAC) is initiating a $175,000 pilot project funded by the California DPR to use steam as an alternative to pre-plant fumigation, advancing work to foster the availability and adoption of sustainable pest management in California.

    The pilot project, led by CAC David Sanford, resulted from conversations with community groups interested in exploring fumigant alternatives near certain sensitive, community-serving locations such as schools. As part of the pilot, several berry producers in the Pajaro Valley will test the use of steam in lieu of conventional pre-plant soil fumigation starting this summer. Research will continue into next year.

    “This pilot represents an important collaboration to meet the needs of communities and growers in California,” said DPR Director Karen Morrison. “DPR is pleased to support efforts that encourage local partnerships, drive innovations in alternatives, and advance sustainable pest management.”

    Steam treatment for pest management involves injecting high temperature steam into the soil before planting. The heat helps reduce certain soil-borne pests, plant diseases, nematodes, and weed seeds. The test fields will be selected for the pilot project based on their proximity to schools or other sensitive sites to explore this potential alternative to help reduce the use of field fumigants near communities.

    DPR recently released findings from an independent study on alternatives to pre-plant fumigants that documented that no existing alternative can currently serve as a direct substitute for chemical fumigants on a wide scale. The study identified the need for more research to understand the soil and climate conditions where alternatives can be effective.

    “This project provides an opportunity to further assess soil steaming as a potential alternative to conventional pre-plant soil fumigation,” Sanford said. “We’re pleased to support this collaborative effort by helping inform the public, facilitating community engagement, and contributing to the evaluation of a promising technology in sustainable pest management.”

    The Santa Cruz CAC and members of Safe Ag Safe Schools (SASS) brought the project to DPR for funding consideration. The CAC will collaborate with a University of California researcher, industry partners, berry growers and landowners, community members, and adjacent sensitive-site representatives on the pilot.

    “The Pajaro Valley has some of the most concentrated use of fumigants in the state, including near schools and homes,” said Kathleen Kilpatrick, SASS member and retired school nurse. “SASS members support exploring non-chemical alternatives on fields near schools. We hope these pilot projects will provide tools for pesticide reduction and expansion of organic buffers.”

    The Santa Cruz CAC will hold community outreach meetings throughout the pilot period, where people can ask questions, provide feedback, and offer input. The first community meeting will take place Aug. 18at 5:30 p.m. in the Greg Caput Community Room of the South County Government Center, 500 Westridge Dr., Watsonville. More information can be found on the Santa Cruz County Agricultural Commissioner’s website

  • DPR Announces Voluntary Cancellation of Paraquat Products

    The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) announced that all manufacturers of pesticide products containing the active ingredient paraquat-dichloride (paraquat) have voluntarily cancelled their product registrations, beginning the phase-out of the use of paraquat in California.

    “For years, communities have fought to end the use of paraquat, a weedkiller associated with negative impacts to human health and wildlife,” said California Secretary for Environmental Protection Yana Garcia. “California will keep moving toward pest management practices that protect health and our ecosystems.”

    DPR initiated the reevaluation of paraquat in November 2024, aligning with requirements in Food & Agricultural Code (FAC) section 14086, and released two preliminary scientific assessments the following month. DPR’s preliminary reports identified a potential association between paraquat exposure and thyroid impacts and birth defects. The reports also indicated paraquat may adversely affect other organisms, with the most significant risks to birds.

    “We need the right data to identify where there are risks to people and the environment,” said DPR Director Karen Morrison. “This is a cornerstone of our continuous evaluation process to respond to evolving science on the impacts of pesticides.”

    Reevaluation gives DPR the authority to require registrants – the companies that make pesticides – to develop and submit new scientific studies needed to fully understand emerging risks that were unknown at the time of registration.  For paraquat, DPR invoked this reevaluation authority to require registrants to submit scientific data by June 5, 2026, to address newly identified gaps in DPR’s human health toxicology database, among other requirements. In lieu of providing required data, companies began voluntarily cancelling registration of paraquat pesticide products in California in April, with the last registrant voluntarily cancelling its registration on Aug. 6.

    Under California law, DPR-licensed dealers may continue to possess and sell pesticides that were voluntarily canceled for up to two years following the effective date of each product’s cancellation. Growers who continue to use these products must act in accordance with all applicable label directions, use requirements, and state and federal regulations.

    Paraquat reevaluation is part of a series of actions at the department to continuously evaluate and mitigate pesticide impacts. Status updates for other actions and pesticide active ingredients and classes under evaluation can be found on DPR’s Continuous Evaluation and Mitigation Update webpage.

    DPR provides funding to research alternatives to pesticides and to increase access to safe, effective sustainable pest management (SPM) through its annual SPM Grants program. The 2027 priority areas include projects that are likely to decrease usage of pesticides prioritized for mitigation or evaluation by DPR, such as paraquat, and those that offer alternatives to weed management. The current application period is open through Sept. 1.

    “To realize systemwide change in California, DPR plays a critical role in supporting additional research and outreach to move the state towards safer, more sustainable pest management approaches,” said Director Morrison. “As growers transition from the use of paraquat, the department will leverage available tools to support the use of effective alternatives and foster SPM.”

    Story contributed by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation

  • Common Tree Disease May Contribute to Reduced Orchard Longevity

    Recent studies conducted by scientists at UCCE and CSU Bakersfield demonstrate that a common disease prevalent in vineyards and orchards may impact long-term orchard longevity of almonds in the southern San Joaquin Valley.  Almond orchards with a high incidence of crown gall, a disease caused by a ubiquitous soilborne pathogen, exhibit high rates of tree failure caused by a newly identified wood rotting disease.

    Crown gall is common in walnut and almond orchards and can be readily identified by the tumors it induces on the roots and crowns of trees. Unless severe, crown gall generally does not cause tree mortality, but may limit tree size, thus affecting overall yield.  Growers with crown gall-affected orchards often replant young trees that exhibit girdling by the tumors but leave mature trees untreated. Within the past decade, however, growers have noticed heightened prevalence of tree mortality due to butt rot in crown gall-affected almond orchards. The butt rot disease is caused by an introduced fungal pathogen, Ganoderma adspersum, that was first reported in California in 2016.

    From 2024 through 2026, UCCE researchers have surveyed over 23,000 almond trees in Kern and Tulare Counties, documenting prevalence of both butt rot and crown gall.  Molecular identification of the butt rot pathogen in each surveyed orchard was conducted by scientists at CSU Bakersfield. The study found that Ganoderma adspersum was the only species of Ganoderma isolated in all surveyed orchards. Additionally, the results indicated that orchards with crown gall were six times more likely to have butt rot disease. Trees with historic or active signs of butt rot also exhibited 1.5 times the mortality rate of healthy trees over a 26-month survey period.

    The results of this work demonstrate that the introduction of the new butt rot pathogen may elevate the importance of crown gall as a predictor of orchard longevity. The implication of this finding is that the planting of crown gall-free rootstocks during orchard establishment may be key to future reduction of risk from G. adspersum. Similarly, Mohammad Yaghmour and Elizabeth Fichtner, Farm Advisors in Kern and Tulare Counties, respectively, found that crown gall was also associated with increased incidence of thousand cankers disease on walnut.  Fichtner has also reported that crown gall is related to heightened root predation by ten-lined June beetle on walnut.

    The current study was conducted with support from the Almond Board of California and as a collaborative effort between UCCE scientists including Elizabeth Fichtner, Santosh Bhandari, Mohammad Yaghmour, and Raymond Mireles, and CSU Bakersfield Professor Isolde Francis and Chance Kophamer, graduate student. — Story by Elizabeth J. Fichtner, UC Ag and Natural Resources

  • Blue Diamond Releases Crop Progress Report

    Blue Diamond Growers release its monthly crop progress report, noting that harvesting conditions began earlier this year due to the impact of the weather.

    Warm summer temperatures dominated the conditions in California’s Central Valley during much of July, with a significant heat wave developing during the final week of the period. Daily maximum temperatures ranged predominately between the mid- and upper 90’s to just over 100 degrees with highest temperatures reported in the southern San Joaquin Valley. Morning lows exhibited greater variability, with readings ranging from the low 50’s to lower 70’s, depending on the degree of cloud cover each morning. Temperatures were amplified by monsoonal moisture traveling northward, bringing occasionally cloudy skies and increased humidity. Increasing daytime temperatures materialized in the final days of the period, marking the start of a significant heat wave. Temperatures were reported to be between 102 to 105 degrees, with higher temperatures forecast for the first week of August.

    The annual return of summertime monsoon flows stirred a bit of apprehension among California’s almond growers, as memories of the challenging 2025 harvest season were rekindled. With that in mind, growers and huller/sheller operators alike worked to complete final pre-harvest tasks during July, focusing on crop maturity that is running well ahead of normal.

    Insect and vegetation management were prime considerations during the period. As noted in our previous report, treatments to protect early harvesting varieties from damage by navel orangeworm were initiated in June, causing the early or advanced crop and pest development. As the crop continues to develop, secondary treatments, intended to catch the insect’s next generation and protect mid and later maturing varieties, were completed in July. As a reflection of the year’s advanced crop development, second treatments have been conducted in roughly the same time frame that initial applications would have been in “normal” years.

    As for other pest issues, observers are reporting increased population of web-spinning mites in the Sacramento and southern San Joaquin Valleys. Control at this stage of crop development presents several challenges and the forecast heat wave promises to expand existing infestations. Treatments targeting almond-damaging ant species have also been performed, including second applications in cases with particularly high populations.

    Observers are reporting widespread instances of red blotch infections in orchards throughout the Central Valley. As may be seen in the photo accompanying this report, if untreated, red blotch can cause severe foliar damage. However, symptoms of this new fungal disease do not appear until 30 to 40 days after infection. Easily spread by airborne spores that are activated by rain events, and potentially by irrigation, this disease spread from a single orchard in Merced County in 2024 to most of the Central Valley by 2025. Orchards that did not receive adequate protection, or any treatments at all are presenting significant symptoms, with the worst infections beginning to defoliate the trees. This is especially problematic in orchards that have been abandoned. Leaf rust, which follows a similar symptomology, has also been observed.

    After delaying or deferring mower passes during the growing season to control costs, vegetation management on the orchard floor became particularly important during the period. Growers must provide for a clean, firm soil surface within the orchard middles (the area between the tree rows), to facilitate an efficient harvest. Where warranted, treatments to control weed regrowth, followed by flail mowers running close to the soil surface, provide the best conditions for a clean harvest.

    Crop maturity also made irrigation management a focal point. Machinery passing through the orchards must be timed between irrigations to prevent rutting of the surface. For those working to employ regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) described in our previous report, the hotter temperatures complicate grower decisions. Under RDI, growers reduce irrigation to one-half of the orchard’s consumptive use for a two-week period at the initiation of hull split. Keeping in mind that water consumption increases as temperatures rise, in extreme cases, normal irrigation scheduling can result in one-half of consumptive use. For those with orchards ready for harvest, water must also be withheld to prevent bark damage during shaking.

    Owing to the advanced crop maturity, harvest operations of the 2026 crop were launched in mid-July. Observers reported the shakers entered the first orchard on July 10 in western Colusa County. Shakers began working in other advanced plantings along the west side of the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys during the week of July 12 and the first crop to be picked up was delivered to huller/shellers during the week of July 19. For those along the east side and along the Highway 99 corridor, shaking of advanced blocks is expected to begin during the first week of August.

    Growers and observers have noted that hulls have begun splitting in several pollinator varieties, indicating a potentially compressed harvest. However, how the crop will flow though huller/shellers will be determined as more crop arrives in the first weeks of August. Observers have noted thick hulls in many orchards that can potentially reduce flow rates during hulling.

    Story by Mel Machado, Blue Diamond Growers

  • Can Vineyard ‘Mothballing’ Help Growers Weather Wine Market Collapse?

    Oversupply of grapes, plummeting consumer demand and skyrocketing production costs have led the wine industry to a crisis point.

    “We have an economic downturn in the wine-grape market, and it is considerably worse or more intense compared to the historical ones within the memory of professionals active in viticulture right now,” said Christopher Chen, University of California Cooperative Extension viticulture advisor for Mendocino, Sonoma and Lake counties.

    The severity of the situation has forced growers to consider a new way to weather the storm – vineyard “mothballing.” Also called idling or resting, it entails maintaining the vines with minimal labor and inputs (and not harvesting the fruit), with an eye toward rapidly ramping up production in the future.

    During hard times, growers typically have two choices, either pull out their vines entirely and replant when the market improves or continue farming as usual, but at a loss. Mothballing might be attractive to some growers – such as those who want to preserve heritage vines – as a “middle road” approach.

    The challenge at present, though, is the lack of a roadmap.

    “I have not seen any good information on mothballing as a practice,” said Chase Thornhill, owner and general manager of Mendocino Wine Company in Ukiah. “I don’t know that there’s any information in the viticulture books on what to do if you’re tight on cash and the industry has collapsed. It doesn’t exist, and the industry really needs that playbook.”

    While Chen observes that mothballing is still relatively rare, he said interest has grown dramatically. Virtually unheard of in his area three years ago, mothballing-type practices can now be seen in about 1 out of 20 vineyards.

    According to Chen, mothballing was first done at scale in Australia, where growers rode out a severe downturn in the early 2000s. Very little academic research on the approach was conducted at that time, however, and now Chen is trying to fill in the gaps.

    In 2025, he launched a study to systematically research the effects of mothballing. At four locations growing cabernet sauvignon and chardonnay in Sonoma and Mendocino counties, Chen is looking at the impacts of different “intensities” of mothballing with varying levels of irrigation and maintenance.

    After collecting preliminary data last year, Chen and the collaborating managers plan to continue mothballing in 2026 and 2027 before attempting to return the vineyards to full production by 2029.

    Growers Must Weigh Costs and Benefits

    Before choosing to mothball, of course, growers need the math to pencil out. At a basic level, that means estimating how much money they would save in vineyard management costs – and then how much it’s going to cost to “correct” the planned reduction in vineyard management as they return to production.

    “That ‘cost now’ versus ‘expenses later’ calculation really determines whether it’s worth it or not to do mothballing,” Chen said. “That’s my primary concern.”

    In his study, Chen is looking at costs and consequences of varying levels of mothballing intensity: 1) doing nothing except pest and disease management; 2) managing pests/disease and also pruning to keep the vines in shape; and 3) continuing to farm but without the “extraneous” practices intended to make the fruit appealing to buyers.

    Last year, Chen studied a site at Mendocino Wine Company, where Thornhill chose a mothballing strategy with very little intervention – just irrigating, spraying for powdery mildew and rolling down cover crops into thatched “mats” on the ground (to reduce fire risks and protect the soil).

    For Thornhill, it was a matter of simple economics. At the beginning of 2025, he knew that he was going to be unable to sell his fruit.

    “If you’re not covering the farming costs with what you’re going to produce and then sell, you’re losing money,” said Thornhill, who has worked in the wine industry for 20 years. “And who can afford to lose money, especially now? That would risk jobs and risk the total enterprise.”

    Estimating that it would cost $30K to $60K per acre to replant, Thornhill did not want to sacrifice his vines’ many future years of productive life just to save some money in the short term.

    “We’ve got to strike a balance between preserving the asset – and not losing our shirt on that preservation,” said Thornhill, adding that he has returned those blocks to production and is waiting to evaluate the harvest later this year.

    Pests Surge, Berries Shrink in First Year

    In the first year of his research, Chen already has made several significant observations. First, he wanted to see if pests would immediately return to the vineyard if a grower stopped managing the canopy and applying pesticides as they would under normal production – or whether there would still be some degree of control due to previous treatments.

    “There isn’t,” Chen said. “We did see – immediately in the first year – a 44% increase in leaf hoppers, which is an easy way to count how many flying insect pests there are in the vineyard more generally.”

    Secondly, on a more positive note, Chen observed that there didn’t appear to be any additional water stress on the vine as a result of not pruning or managing the canopy.

    And third, he saw that berry development slowed under mothballing conditions. By eschewing pruning, there were more shoots and clusters and thus more berries, but they were smaller and with less sugar accumulation.

    “If you plan to do this, you have to plan to not harvest,” Chen advised. “You can’t try to harvest because the quality of the fruit is not going to be typically acceptable to most wineries.”

    Disease and Pest Management Must Continue

    Another point of emphasis for viticulture experts is that growers must not consider mothballing a passive practice. George Zhuang, UCCE viticulture advisor for Fresno County, said his biggest worry with mothballing is potential neglect of pest and disease management due to a grower’s “laser-focus” on cutting costs.

    “My concern is that the pest and disease issue becomes so enormous that when you decide to bring the vineyard back, it might not be possible,” said Zhuang, highlighting vine mealybug as one prominent threat.

    Chen echoed that sentiment, emphasizing that mothballing is an active management process – and not a “set it and forget it” approach.

    “You do have to go out and make sure that the pests and diseases are under control because that is a regulatory issue with the state and the county governments, and you will get fined and penalized for becoming a pest nuisance if you’re not careful,” said Chen. He added that growers should inform their neighbors that they are mothballing and not abandoning their vineyard, as the appearance of the vines and land look virtually identical under both conditions.

    Furthermore, instead of cutting water and fertilizer “cold turkey” to a vineyard’s mothballed state, Chen recommends that growers gradually taper their applications.

    “The vines acclimate to those inputs year to year, so if they’re used to getting irrigation at high volumes every year, and if you stop water, you will cause permanent damage to those grapevines,” Chen warned.

    Conversely, as a vineyard manager ramps up to normal production levels, they should not go to full irrigation right away, as that would cause unruly growth requiring intensive labor to correct, control and train.

    Lastly, Chen advises growers to develop a year-by-year plan for mothballing their vineyards and returning them to full production. Based on their best prediction for future market conditions, they should devise a “reentry timeframe.”

    “Plan when you are going to come back into production so that you can properly manage the resources and the vine health and the pruning and recovery period so that when you come back, it’s ready to go – rather than running into a bunch of walls,” he said.

    Funding Needed for Research

    Chen noted that mothballing might be a realistic option only for smaller operations, which are common in his region and encompass 15 to 40 acres on average. Many wine grape growers in the San Joaquin Valley, in contrast, farm hundreds of acres – making mothballing logistically more difficult and economically less viable.

    Zhuang said growers also have to consider the opportunity costs of mothballing, especially in parts of the state where they could replace wine grapes with crops such as vegetables, almonds, pistachios or citrus. “If you do have a plan B, maybe vineyard mothballing is not really beneficial for you,” he said.

    Chen and Zhuang said further economic analyses are needed for growers to make the best financial decisions. In addition to analyzing those tradeoffs, Chen hopes to examine the chemistry of the fruit throughout the mothballing process (Brix/sugar concentration and pH) and the practice’s effects on wine quality and taste.

    While Chen is monitoring for leafhoppers, glassy-winged sharpshooters and other insects, he does not have funding to do spore counts for powdery mildew and Botrytis, two of the major fungal pathogens in vineyards. He would also like to examine impacts on soil health.

    Although Chen is grateful for “in-kind” support from vineyard owners for access to study sites, he has not received external funds for this research to date. And to Thornhill and his peers in the wine industry, Chen’s “playbook” is a vital piece of information for growers, who are most concerned about the time to recovery after mothballing.

    “I think that the general reaction is: ‘Wait a minute, what’s going to happen?’ If we don’t farm this year, does that mean that it’s going take us three years to get back to full capacity, just as if we were planting a new vineyard? Is it going to take two years? Just one?” Thornhill explained. “We just don’t know.”

    By Mike Hsu, UC Ag and Natural Resources

  • Mysterious Virus Affects Melons

    ARS researchers have found a new virus playing hide and seek with the melon industry. In 2023, unusual symptoms of infection were observed in melon and watermelon plants from Arizona and California. ARS scientists in Salinas sampled infected plants and used gene sequencing technology to identify the culprit as watermelon chlorotic stunt virus (WmCSV).

    This virus is transmitted by whiteflies and can cause significant yield loss — particularly in watermelon —but it also infects all types of cucurbit (melon, pumpkin, squash and cucumber) crops. WmCSV joins an existing virus complex causing yield impacts for production of melon and watermelon in the southwestern United States. This is the first time WmCSV has been identified in cucurbit plants in the Western Hemisphere. As a result, the cucurbit industry was notified of the threat posed by this virus, and they are taking efforts to keep it from being transported to other regions of the United States. — Story contributed by the USDA Ag Research Service

  • Free CE Course Now Available on Invasive Fruit Flies in California

    The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) is offering an updated free Continuing Education (CE) course designed specifically for Pest Control Advisers (PCAs) and other industry professionals focused on invasive pest management.

    Titled Invasive Fruit Flies in California, this was a popular CE course last year. It has been updated for 2026 and provides an in-depth look at the rising pressure of invasive fruit flies (IFF) across the state and the critical role PCAs play in early detection and containment. This course is approved for 1.0 DPR CEUs.

    Participants will:

    • Understand the pest profiles of major IFF species affecting California
    • Learn the triggers that initiate quarantines in the state
    • Explore best practices for supporting growers with timely, science-based recommendations
    • Review the 2023-2026 IFF response strategies
    • Discover innovations shaping the future of pest detection and management

    This complimentary CE course is a valuable resource for PCAs looking to stay informedand proactive in the protection of California’s agricultural economy.

    To enroll, click the button below, sign into your CAPCA.com account, then go to “Online Learning,” then “Shop” to register at no cost.

    Story contributed by CAPCA

    Enroll Here