Category: Non-Video

  • Diagnosing Herbicide Symptoms Course, July 10-11

    Weed scientists at the University of California are offering the Diagnosing Herbicide Symptoms 2018 course on July 10-11, 2018. This 1-1/2 day course will focus on how an herbicide injury situation can arise, what types of information can help diagnose herbicide problems during field investigations, and what herbicide symptomology tools are available to you.

    The course provides a rare opportunity for professionals to update their understanding of herbicide symptoms and injuries and interact with experts in this field. Cooperative Extension specialists Kassim Al-Khatib and Brad Hanson along with farm advisor John Roncoroni are a few of the course instructors.

    Topics include herbicide mode of actions :: how symptoms develop and progress :: recovery from herbicide injury :: relationship between symptomology and economical damage :: symptoms from several classes of amino acid synthesis inhibiting herbicides :: symptoms from herbicides that mimic plant hormones and the synthesis of fatty acids :: symptoms from herbicides that affect photosystem I, photosystem II, or that act by disrupting cell membranes :: biotic and abiotic symptoms that resemble herbicide symptoms :: herbicide symptomology tools :: what happens during a field investigation :: what happens in an herbicide injury legal case.

    This program is intended for pest control advisers, sales representatives for chemical companies, field investigators, and insurance adjusters.

    Take advantage of the early-bird registration fee ($465.) The fee goes up after June 10 to $495 and then to $525 after June 26. The registration fee includes lunch, refreshments and course materials.

    The course is approved for DPR and CCA continuing education credits–PCA, QAC, QAL, Private Applicator: 8.0 Other; Certified Crop Adviser: 7.0 IPM, 1.0 PD

    More information, visit the UC Weed Research & Information Center website (http://wric.ucdavis.edu/) and click on DIAGNOSING HERBICIDE SYMPTOMS.

  • CropManage Hands-on Workshop, June 6

    Bringing Irrigation & Nutrient Management Decision Support to the Field

    Date: Wednesday, June 6, 2018
    1pm – 4:30pm

    Location: UCCE Ventura, 669 County Square Drive, Ventura, CA 93003
    California Room

    669 County Square Drive Suite 100 Ventura CA 93003 805-645-1451 • ceventura.ucanr.edu

    • Learn how to use CropManage to support irrigation and nutrient management decisions and record-keeping
    • Learn the new version of CropManage (3.0) – also available in SpanishCropManage is a free online decision support tool for water and nutrient management of coastal crops. Based on in-depth research and field studies conducted by the University of California, CropManage provides real-time recommendations for efficient irrigation and fertilization applications— while maintaining or improving overall yield.

      At this free workshop, we will provide hands-on training so that you can learn to use the newest version of CropManage (3.0) which has been updated to be more compatible for in-field use by farm staff. CropManage is now available in Spanish.

      Crops currently supported by CropManage in Ventura County include strawberry and celery. In the Watsonville area, raspberry, head, romaine, and leaf lettuce, broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, bell pepper, spinach, baby lettuce, cilantro and mizuna, in addition to strawberry and celery.

      Who should participate? Vegetable and berry growers, ranch managers, other farm staff, and technical service providers are welcome. The workshop is for both new and current CropManage users.

      What to bring? This is a participatory workshop. Please bring a tablet or laptop computer so that you can follow along and participate in the exercises. Each participant will need a user account for CropManage. Please set up a free user account at v3.cropmanage.ucanr.edu before the workshop.

      Registration is free: Please register by May 30 using the following link:http://ucanr.edu/survey/survey.cfm?surveynumber=24795

      Questions: Andre Biscaro at asbiscaro@ucanr.edu or 805-645-1465.

      AGENDA

      1:00 – 1:30 Registration and computer set-up
      1:30 – 3:00 Getting started with CropManage 3.0
      3:00 BREAK
      3:15 – 4:00 Strategies for using CropManage for decision support and record-keeping 4:00 – 4:20 Advanced features and interfacing sensors with CropManage
      4:20 – 4:30 Discussion of new features or changes needed

      2.5 Continuing Education Units (CEU) applied for Certified Crop Advisers (CCA)

      It is the policy of the University of California (UC) and the UC Division of Agriculture & Natural Resources not to engage in discrimination against or harassment of any person in any of its programs or activities (Complete nondiscrimination policy statement can be found at http://ucanr.edu/sites/anrstaff/files/215244.pdf ).

      Inquiries regarding ANR’s nondiscrimination policies may be directed to John I. Sims, Affirmative Action Compliance Officer/Title IX Officer, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2801 Second Street, Davis, CA 95618, (530) 750-1397.

  • Berry Grower Embraces Conservation & History

    Sweet Present, Rich Past

    A honey bee helps pollinate Carolyn Read’s boysenberry bushes. Photo by Jonathan Snapp-Cook/USFWS.

    By Joanna Gilkeson – It would be easy to call Carolyn Read a preservationist and leave it at that. How many people would settle in a ranch house built 130 years ago and raise a family there?

    Or call her a conservationist. Read has made sure that native plants that were in danger of getting choked out by other invasives are again thriving in the arid reaches of her San Diego-area ranch.

    Make sure you give Read credit for her business sense, too. She started a horse-themed magazine more than 30 years ago that remains an award-winning publication on the West Coast.  She’s also raising and selling boysenberries.

    Read is a rancher, an active community member, an equestrian advocate, a conservationist, a historian, an entrepreneur, a grower, a mother and a grandmother — all of which stem from her opportunity to build a life on the land.

    A honey bee gathers nectar from black sage (Salvia mellifera), a coastal sage scrub plant, on Carolyn Read’s property. Photo by Jonathan Snapp-Cook/USFWS.

    She’s worked with others to ensure that a ranch started in the 1800s remains viable, even as development nears its borders. Among her collaborators: the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), which advised her as Read restored a hillside with coastal sage scrub. From that collaboration came a friendship with a Service biologist. That connection has roots as hearty as the sage scrub growing on the hills.

    Read, 86, is just happy to remain on the land that she has tended so carefully for more than five decades.

    “I am grateful for the opportunity to acquire and raise my family in this home,” she said recently, “and for the living heritage the area has given us.”

    Read walking along her boysenberry bushes before demonstrating the irrigation system. Photo by Joanna Gilkeson/USFWS.

    A Blessing

    In 1874, an Arkansan by the name of Reynold Bascomb Borden traveled cross-county in a covered wagon. It came to a halt in a valley blanketed by coastal sage scrub and sunshine. In 1882, he would construct one of the first homesteads in this remote valley, now present-day San Marcos, in San Diego County.

    The family kept the clapboard house until 1929. It went through more owners until 1963, when it was put up for sale. Three parties expressed interest in it. One was a young woman who needed space for a growing family.

    “At the time, I was a single mom with four children,” Read said. “…For some reason the family who owned the property at the time chose me.”

    It was a blessing. “I was able to establish roots, a chance to make a home.”

    A Belding’s Orange Throated Whiptail on Carolyn’s property. Photo by Jonathan Snapp-Cook/USFWS.

    Today, the property also is home to California quail, hummingbirds, pollinators, lizards, rattlesnakes and birds of prey.

    She pointed to a hawk’s nest in the top of a eucalyptus tree.

    “That’s the 12th generation of this pair of hawks,” Read said. “They just had their babies. The small sparrows torment them.”

    ‘Strong Connection’

    In 2012, Read decided she needed help to restore wildlife habitat on her land. She worried that the native flora was getting overwhelmed by invasive plants.

    Jonathan Snapp-Cook, Partners Biologist, translocates California sagebrush (Artemisia californica) to the restoration site. Photo by Carmen Wilson.

    Jonathan Snapp-Cook, a Service biologist, visited her ranch. He knew right away that they shared an appreciation of land stewardship.

    “It was obvious she had a strong connection to the historical and cultural aspects of her property and wanted to conserve wildlife,” said Snapp-Cook. “I knew it was going to be the beginning of a good partnership.”

    Snapp-Cook and Read embarked on a restoration project to benefit native wildlife. A portion of the hillside behind Read’s house was chock-full of invasive plants while native coastal sage scrub voluntarily grew on the property’s dirt roads.

    The idea: transplant the coastal native sage scrub in the roadway to the tract where invasives grew. It was best, they decided, to use the plants they already had to make the restoration take root.

    As Read described it: “If the plants are able to make it on their own, then that’s who survives. They are the survivors.”

    So far, the native plants are winning. Snapp-Cook and Read have completed three small, flourishing sections of restoration — but they didn’t do it alone. Read’s hired farm hands, family and grandchildren helped restore the hillside, one plant at time.

    The restoration project has been a lesson for Read and her family; they see the sage scrub as a valuable member of the ranch ecosystem.

    “Jonathan has been quite an inspiration to me, to walk across the property with a biologist, and the native plants he finds, he points out all these things happening at my feet,” she said. “It’s become a very enlightening friendship.”

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Partners Biologist Jonathan Snapp-Cook overlooking the invasive species on Carolyn Read’s property. Photo by Celeste Medina-Ontiveros/USFWS.

    Horses & Berries

    The view from Read’s front porch has changed since she moved in. Over the years she has watched development slowly creep toward her ranch. The 14-acre property is flanked by rows of white-and-beige houses on one side. An open space soon to be developed shares a property line on another. A hillside of coastal sage shrub touches a third.

    Even as San Marcos extends its borders toward her, Read remains determined to protect the land and the creatures that live there.

    Carolyn Read walks a horse out to pasture. Behind her is a remnant of her previous career as founder of Horsetrader magazine. Photo by Joanna Gilkeson/USFWS.

    Every inch of the 14-acre ranch continues to be productive, which includes seven acres of preserved habitat. Read has four horses on site, with pastures to match. Three years ago, she turned her attention to a local delicacy.

    Read began growing boysenberries – a move driven in equal parts by an appreciation of history as well as the bottom line.

    The boysenberry enjoys historic importance in Southern California. In 1932, Knott’s Berry Farm in Buena Park, California, created a new kind of produce – a cross between red raspberries, blackberries and loganberries. The Knott family dubbed it the boysenberry.

    The new berry was a tough thing to cultivate, its bushes riddled with thorns, but the payoff was good, too. Consumers loved the boysenberry. So does Read.

    Carolyn Read’s boysenberries straight out of the crisper and ready to sell. Read became organically certified in April 2018. Photo courtesy of Carolyn Read.

    “I started selling my berries to the neighbors, and I’ve gotten so much good feedback from the community,” she said. “I’ve connected with my neighbors because of the berries and they’re wonderful people.”

    The berries also have made their way into local high-end restaurants through a contract with a San Diego produce distributor. “I don’t even know how it all happened,” Read said, “but I’m grateful.”

    Growing and sharing California’s homegrown classic fruit is the way Read has chosen to share the living heritage of the homestead with the greater community.

    For Read, the boysenberry provides a tangible, tasty link to the area’s rich history.

    “Without the places that keep our stories alive…we lose some of the most profound parts of our local history,” she said.

    She feels that way about her ranch, too. “It is part of who I am,” she said. “I would like to see some of that lifestyle preserved for future generations.”

    California quail make themselves at home on the Pepper Hill Borden Homestead.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service supported this Nature’s Good
    Neighbor through our Partners for Fish and Wildlife program. Our Partners program would like to acknowledge the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service for introducing them to this local landowner. The Partners program is a voluntary initiative that works with private landowners to improve fish and wildlife habitat on their land. A phone call or email is all it takes to learn more with one of our 250 private lands biologists. If you are interested in improving habitat for fish and wildlife on your land,
    find your local Partners for Fish and Wildlife biologist.

    Joanna Gilkeson is a public affairs specialist out of the Pacific Southwest Region in Carlsbad, California.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Record-Breaking Almond Crop Predicted for 2018

    In spite of concerns about freezing weather during almond bloom, the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) is predicting a record crop in 2018. According to the NASS 2018 Almond Subjective Forecast issued today, California almond orchards are expected to produce 2.30 billion pounds of nuts this year, up 1.3% from last year’s 2.27 billion-pound crop.[1]

    Karen Barindelli observes a solid 2018 almond crop in her Modesto orchard

    “Almond farmers used a variety of techniques to manage freezing nighttime temperatures in some parts of the Central Valley during bloom this year and those efforts appear to have worked,” said Richard Waycott, president and CEO, Almond Board of California. “Every year weather impacts farming, but almond trees thrive in our state because California is home to the world’s most efficient almond farmers, who continually improve their practices and rise to the challenge.”

    The Almond Subjective Forecast, the first of two California almond forecast reports for this year’s crop, is based on opinions obtained from randomly selected almond farmers located throughout the state via a phone survey conducted in April and May. Farmers were asked to indicate their almond yield per acre from last year and expected yield for the current year based on field observations. Those estimates are then combined and extrapolated to arrive at the numbers reported in the Almond Subjective Forecast.

    While the Almond Subjective Forecast provides early estimates of the coming crop after it is set, the 2018 California Almond Objective Report, which is released in July, uses a more statistically rigorous methodology. It is typically the more accurate of the two reports. Objective Report data is based on actual almond counts and measurements taken in orchards throughout the state, starting in May and ending in July.

    The Objective Report will be released July 5, 2018, at noon PDT. Both the report and the forecast are conducted by the USDA and funded by the Almond Board of California to provide almond farmers, processors and shippers with estimates to help them make business decisions.

    Last month, the 2017 California Almond Acreage Report showed bearing acres, that is orchards old enough to produce a crop, were up 6% at 1 million acres. Total almond acres for 2017 were estimated at 1.33 million acres, up 7% from the previous year.

    Almond acreage in California continues to experience significant increases.

    [1] USDA-NASS. 2018 California Almond Subjective Forecast. May 2018.

  • 2018 Omnibus Bill Nixes DUNS and SAM Requirements for Farmers

    Washington, D. C., (May 2, 2018) – Effectively immediately, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) financial assistance program participants will no longer need a Dun and Bradstreet Universal Number System (DUNS) number, or to register in the System for Award Management (SAM). The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 (2018 Omnibus Bill), signed by President Donald Trump on March 23, eliminated these requirements.

    According to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue, DUNS and SAM were designed for billion-dollar government contractors, not everyday farmers trying to support their families. These changes help streamline the customer experience of farmers, which is a top priority at USDA, he said.

    “This change greatly simplifies the contracting process for our customers and staff,” said Acting NRCS Chief Leonard Jordan. “Conservation program participants will soon receive letters from their local NRCS office with more details.”

    The exemption does not apply to any current or future agreements or federal contracts with eligible entities, project sponsors, vendors, partners, or other non-exempt landowners or producers.

    DUNS/SAM registration is still required for:

    • Partnership agreements entered through the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP).
    • All agreements with eligible entities under the Farm and Ranchland Protection Program (FRPP)
    • Agreements under the Agricultural Land Easement (ALE) component of ACEP.
    • Partnership agreements under the Wetland Reserve Enhancement Program (WREP) component of ACEP-Wetland Reserve Easements (WRE).
    • Watershed operations agreements with project sponsors.
    • Emergency Watershed Protection Program (EWP) agreements with project sponsors, including Recovery and Floodplain Easements.
    • All cooperative, contribution, interagency, or partnership agreements of Federal contracts used by NRCS to procure goods or services.

    NRCS advises participants in its programs to ignore any emails, phone calls or other communications from third-party vendors offering assistance for registering in SAMS or applying for a DUNS number.

    To learn more about NRCS financial and technical assistance, go to www.nrcs.usda.gov.

  • DWR Increases Water Supply Allocation to State Water Contractors

    Sacramento, Calif., (May 2, 2018) – The Department of Water Resources (DWR) today announced a statewide increase in State Water Project (SWP) allocations for 2018. SWP contractors can now expect to receive 30 percent of their requests, up from the initial 15 percent allocation in December and the 20 percent announced in January.

    “Late precipitation and snow in March has brought us closer to an average year, however, this year has been anything but normal,” said Karla Nemeth, DWR Director. “While our storage is in good shape, our snowpack is low. California’s highly variable weather reminds us that prudent planning and water conservation is a necessity and is the new norm.”

    A 30 percent allocation amounts to 1,268,724 acre-feet of water, distributed among the 29 SWP contractors who serve more than 27 million Californians and about 750,000 acres of farmland.

    A 100 percent allocation is rare even in wet years due to Delta pumping restrictions to protect threatened and endangered fish species. The last 100 percent allocation was in 2006.

    One of the leading factors in determining allocations is snow water content. The statewide snow water content is currently 37 percent of average. Despite the above-normal precipitation received in March and April, warm temperatures increased runoff and snowmelt in the Northern Sierra, resulting in diminished snowpack for this time of year.

    The state’s major reservoirs continue to be well above their historical averages. San Luis Reservoir, the largest off-stream reservoir in the United States where water is stored for the SWP and Central Valley Project (CVP), is at 89 percent of capacity. Shasta Lake, the CVP’s largest reservoir, is at 92 percent of capacity. Lake Oroville is at 67 percent of capacity. New Melones Lake is at 86 percent of capacity.

    DWR’s California Data Exchange Center website provides current water conditions at the state’s largest reservoirs and weather stations and measures current rain and snow precipitation.

    For more information, follow us on Twitter or Facebook, read our news releases

  • UC Davis Settles Animal Welfare Citation

    Davis, Calif., (May 1, 2018) – The University of California, Davis, has agreed to pay a penalty of $5,000 to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to resolve a citation under the Animal Welfare Act.

    The July 2016 citation described a procedure on a rabbit that was to be euthanized before recovering from anesthesia. The rabbit died under anesthesia when a valve was inadvertently left closed. As a result, staff have been retrained and the valves replaced with valves that are open by default.

    In 2016, the Investigative and Enforcement Service of USDA had notified the university that it would conduct an investigation. UC Davis cooperated fully with the investigation process.

    In March 2018, USDA notified UC Davis that it had determined a penalty of $5,000 for the July 2016 citation. UC Davis has accepted this penalty.

    “While incidents like these are rare considering the scale of our research programs involving animals, each one is taken very seriously and investigated to prevent future occurrences,” said Cameron Carter, interim vice chancellor for Research at UC Davis. “Our expectation is to provide the best possible care to any animal in our charge, treating their safety and welfare as paramount, and our committed staff goes to great lengths to ensure this. Unfortunately, some mistakes happen, but we are quick to learn from them and take appropriate actions to further improve care.”

    Oversight of animal use is heavily regulated by multiple sources. All research studies at the university involving animals require review and approval by the campus’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee to ensure ethical and humane treatment. This committee includes public representatives as well as faculty and staff. The IACUC also inspects facilities conducting animal research every six months.

    UC Davis is accredited by the International Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, or AAALAC, an independent nonprofit organization. Application for the accreditation is voluntary and requires re-evaluation every three years. The university also conducted a comprehensive internal review of animal care on campus in 2017 in preparation of transitioning the program to the Office of Research. The report found no systemic shortcomings in the animal care program but made a number of recommendations to further strengthen the program.

    At the federal level, animal research is overseen by the Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Care Unit, and the National Institutes of Health Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.

    More information regarding research involving animals can be found here.

     

  • Nickels Soil Lab Annual Field Day, Tuesday, May 8, 2018

    Arbuckle, Calif., (May 1, 2018) – Come join in the festivities, fun and of course the .75 hours of PCA CE credits or the 2 hours of CCA CE credits, at the Nickels Soil Lab Annual Field Day at the Nickels Soil lab on Marine Avenue in Arbuckle, CA. There will be a tri-tip lunch by reservation so do not wait to register for this event, do it now to get all the wonderful benefits.

    Here is the agenda for the day:

    8:30 am — Registration: Coffee and Donuts provided by Farm Credit Services of Colusa-Glenn, ACA

    Cycle I: 9:20-10:45 am

    1. Overview of navel orange worm management – Dani Lghtle, UCCE Advisor, Glenn/Butte/Tehama Counties
    2. Band canker management – Themis Michailides, Plant Pathologist and Lecturer, UC Davis Plant Pathology Department
    3. Frost Protection in almonds – Joe Connell, Farm Advisor, UCCE Butte County (emeritus)
    4. Almond flower biology – Tom Gradziel, Professor, UC Davis Department of Plant Sciences.

    Cycle II: 10:45 am -12:10 pm

    1. Basic Bee Biology 101 – Elina Niño, Extension Specialist, UC Davis Entomology and Nematology Department
    2. Ceratocystis canker: diagnosis and management – Florent Trouillas, Extension Specialist, UC Davis Plant Pathology Department
    3. Using real time physiological data to guide irrigation scheduling – Tom Buckley, Professor, UC Davis Department of Plant Sciences
    4. What are we learning from orchard biomas (chip and mix) studies? – Emad Jahanzad, Postdoctoral researcher, UC Davis Plant Sciences Department

    12:15 – BBQ Tri-Tip Lunch (by reservation) – Lucheon Speaker, Mark Jansen, President & CEO, Blud Diamond Growers

    to review the flyer which contains the agenda, map, and registration form please copy this link into your browser window – http://cesutter.ucanr.edu/newsletters/Pomology_Notes74801.pdf

     

  • Depooling—Should I Be Scared?

    Modesto, Calif., (April 30, 2018) – Depooling has been praised and vilified; its impact has been exaggerated and understated. And a lot of producers are left wondering: what does it mean to me? One thing sure is certain, it is very different than what we have in California. Class 3, 4a and 4b plants can make the decision to depool on a yearly basis. But, they usually don’t because if they do, California still requires them to pay minimum class prices. Therefore, in 2017 only 2.7% of California milk was Grade A milk not pooled. This number represents milk shipped to a non-pool plant but also milk shipped out of state and producer-handler exempt milk. Two things make the decision to opt outside the pool very different in the California system.

    The first one, as I mentioned, is that even if you elect to be a non-pool plant, you are still required to pay the minimum class prices. For example, if a cheese maker elects to operate outside of the California pool, he can enter into a contract with its Grade A shipper, but he is still required to at least pay the minimum class price. In a California FMMO, said cheese maker could enter into a contract that is agreeable to both parties, but no minimum price would be required by USDA. Second, if you own quota in California, you must ship Grade A milk to a pool plant once at least every 60 days to keep your quota. In fact, as testified at the FMMO hearing, “a proportionate amount of monthly quota entitlement will be lost for any milk shipped directly to a nonpool plant”. As a reminder, under a California FMMO, this would not be the case. As per the Quota Implementation Plan (QIP), all Grade A milk under the order would be assessed for quota, regardless of whether it is pooled or not. Therefore, a quota holder would be indifferent as to whether his milk is pooled or not for quota payment purposes.

    Under the California system, less than 3% of milk goes to nonpool plants. Under a California FMMO, that percentage would change drastically. While there is no way to determine exactly how much, USDA estimated that on average 42% of manufacturing milk (ie. milk other than Class I) would not be pooled. According to Dr. Stephenson’s analysis, around 56% of manufacturing milk would not be pooled. Looking at 2017, he found that taking such volumes out of the pool for the year would result in a minor negative price impact on pooled milk (-4 cents/cwt). Most of the Class IV, due to its lowest price relative to Class III, would have had an incentive to remain in the pool. To give you an example, in 2017 under the California system, Class 4a averaged below the overbase price 75% of the time. This means producers shipping to Class 4a plants benefited from the pool as the price they received was higher than if they otherwise had not been pooled.

    Going back to USDA’s proposed California order, if handlers tried to come in and out of the pool in opportunistic ways (ie try to maximize pool draws and avoid pool contributions within the repooling rules, which are explained in the next paragraph), the impact would be slightly different. While I found that some months could have wider swings, on average monthly depooling could result in the pooled milk price to decline by a range of 5-10 cents per hundredweight. The reason for the decline is that a handler is likely to take milk out of the pool if the class price it is required to pay is higher than the return it would get from being in the pool. Therefore, taking higher valued milk outside the pool reduces the blend price for those left in the pool. As a reminder, Class I milk is always part of the pool.

    To prevent wide swings of milk volumes jumping in and out of the pool on a monthly basis, USDA proposed repooling rules for the California order. What this means is that if a handler elects to take milk outside the pool in a given month, the next month he can only repool 125% of the previous month.

  • Reflections on Earth Day and the Role of Farmers and Ranchers

    Sacramento, Calif., (April 30, 2018) – As Earth Day was celebrated, I couldn’t help but think about how lucky I am to have grown up on a farm with a dad who inspired me with his love for the land.  His life-long curiosity led him to constantly look at new and innovative practices to steward natural resources and improve the care of his cow-calf herd.  His particular passion for the soil led to decades of work with USDA’s Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS, which was still called Soil Conservation Service at that time). It came from his growing up in western Nebraska during the Depression and the Great Dust Bowl years.  He often described the curtains of dirt that darkened the skies and drove people and animals to shelter.  He watched too much precious top soil blow away.

    My dad, like his father and grandfather before him, wanted to leave the land – pastures and cropland – better than he found it for his children and the generations to follow. That commitment lives on in my brother, Dan Barrett, the current steward of our family farm. Dan is the fourth generation.  A farmer’s farmer.  He has worked hard to bring the farm into agronomic balance, and he has been in the NRCS Conservation Stewardship Program for about ten years. He was identified as a leader for his soil health and wildlife-friendly practices. He has successfully incorporated conservation rotational grazing and cover crops to bring what he terms “liveliness to the soil”. He is also one of the kindest people I know!!

    That long-term generational view held by our family, a passion for stewardship of the land and its natural resources, is what it means to be in farming and ranching.  I see it every day in California agriculture.  That love of the land fuels my passion  to connect the stewardship actions of our 76,000-plus family farmers and ranchers to the public benefits created for the forty million Californians who make this special place their home.  That care for the land, in addition to the nutritious bounty that we grow in California, makes our state a better place to live!  It has never been more important to understand and support the potential of working landscapes to address climate change, and the essential role of private landowners in making it happen.

    While California agriculture is already being impacted by climate change, Ag is also key to mitigating climate change. California’s Climate Change Investments have resulted in multiple incentive programs to facilitate climate adaptation strategies and the implementation of practices to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and sequester carbon.  Significant investments are being made on farms and ranches to improve manure management and reduce methane emissions; to increase water, fertilizer and energy efficiency; to replace older equipment and dirty engines; to protect croplands and rangelands at risk of conversion and the generation of more GHG emissions; to utilize waste biomass to generate renewable energy; and to sequester carbon to reduce GHG emissions and improve soil health, thus enhancing climate and drought resiliency and productivity.   Ultimately, these climate smart agriculture investments will ensure the continued economic viability of California agriculture and its role in sustaining food security.

    As recent coverage of how soil can be managed to sequester carbon and be a solution to climate change creates a buzz for what is possible on working landscapes, I want to thank my Dad and honor his memory for his love of the land.  Truly, he and generations of farmers and ranchers are important caretakers of our planet Earth.