Category: Livestock

  • Bird Flu Causes Massive Impact on California & National Milk Production

    To date, H5N1 avian influenza virus type A (bird flu) has been confirmed in dairy cattle across 17 states, and has infiltrated the epicenter of the nation’s milk production — the Central Valley of California. As of April 7, it has been detected on 758 California herds. While new cases and the spread of the virus has slowed with the onset of springtime (and conditions have improved since the time of the interview), the virus’ impact on lower milk production in the Central Valley was felt by the nation. California Dairy Editor Matthew Malcolm met with Senior Dairy Analyst at Rabobank Lucas Fuess at the World Ag Expo to discuss the impact the virus has had on cows, national production and prices. Watch this brief interview and read more about the economic impact of H5N1 in the latest issue of California Dairy Magazine.

  • Livestock Marketing Association Supports Re-Introduction of A-PLUS Act

    An outdated prohibition almost cost Heidi Nicholas her marriage. On paper, anyway.

    When the chance arose to buy Empire Livestock — a business with six livestock auction markets across New York — she seized it. Nicholas understood the markets’ vital role in the region and saw no one else stepping up to keep them running.

    But there was one major obstacle: her husband owned Nicholas Meat, a packing company in Pennsylvania. A Packers and Stockyards Act requirement, which predates modern livestock auctions, prohibits livestock market owners from owning packing companies.

    Even though Nicholas planned to purchase the auction markets with personal, non-marital funds — and had the documents to prove that — she faced pushback from USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Services’ Packers and Stockyards Division.

    At one point, she even told the authorities the couple would divorce if that’s what it took. That’s how strongly she felt.

    Eventually, she was able to complete the sale.

    But what about established auction market owners? Nicholas pointed out in many areas, there aren’t enough packers and processors to encourage competition or meet demand. Allowing markets to be part of the solution, such as opening a local locker or investing in a pooled funds regAn outdated prohibition almost cost Heidi Nicholas her marriage. On paper, anyway.

    When the chance arose to buy Empire Livestock — a business with six livestock auction markets across New York — she seized it. Nicholas understood the markets’ vital role in the region and saw no one else stepping up to keep them running.

    But there was one major obstacle: her husband owned Nicholas Meat, a packing company in Pennsylvania. A Packers and Stockyards Act requirement, which predates modern livestock auctions, prohibits livestock market owners from owning packing companies.

    Even though Nicholas planned to purchase the auction markets with personal, non-marital funds — and had the documents to prove that — she faced pushback from USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Services’ Packers and Stockyards Division.

    At one point, she even told the authorities the couple would divorce if that’s what it took. That’s how strongly she felt.

    Eventually, she was able to complete the sale.

    But what about established auction market owners? Nicholas pointed out in many areas, there aren’t enough packers and processors to encourage competition or meet demand. Allowing markets to be part of the solution, such as opening a local locker or investing in a pooled funds regional packer, would support both markets and processors — while benefiting the producers who rely on these services.

    A solution was recently reintroduced in the 119th Congress. The Amplifying Processing of Livestock in the United States, or the A-PLUS Act, and Expanding Local Meat Processing Act (HR 1648 and SB 782), would allow livestock market owners to invest in small and regional packers.

    Supporting the bills was just one reason Livestock Marketing Association, or LMA, members gathered in Washington, D.C., March 9-11. Throughout their annual fly-in, the group also advocated for key Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions to be extended before expiring. They also expressed thanks for Congress passing Livestock Dealer Statutory Trust in 2020, which improves recovery when livestock dealers default.

    For first-time participant Teto Medina Wallace, who is manager and lead auctioneer for Santa Teresa Livestock Auction in New Mexico, it was an unforgettable experience — and one he cannot recommend enough to fellow LMA members.

    “I came here with high expectations, but this has completely blown me away,” Medina Wallace said. “The quality of everything we’ve done and what I’ve learned… Just being in the halls of the heart and arteries of our nation has been something that has moved me tremendously.”

    Nicholas agreed.

    “I’m 66 years old and it’s the first time I’ve ever been to D.C.,” she said. “So, to be able to tour the Capitol and be in the agricultural committee room of the House of Representatives. It was so intriguing.”

    Additionally, the two participants enjoyed the connections they made, both with policymakers and their fellow LMA members. Both were able to extend personal invitations to elected officials to visit their auction markets firsthand. They also had the rare opportunity to talk shop with other livestock marketers from 20 different states across the U.S.

    Wallace Medina said he was impressed by the group’s ability to come together and work toward common goals, even though their operations may have differences.

    LMA President Mike VanMaanen, who owns Eastern Missouri Commission Co., agreed.

    “I’m just so proud of the number of members who took time away from their busy schedules and families to come advocate for our industry on Capitol Hill,” he said. “We’re so much stronger together. The relationships built and maintained on the trip will make sure our industry’s interests are considered in federal policy decisions.”

    Members who participated in the fly-in were: Justin Cozzi, Dos Palos Y, California; Jarod Cozzi, Dos Palos Y, California; Bowdy Griffin, Galt, California; Joe Nelson, Lanesboro, Minnesota; Barb Nelson, Lanesboro, Minnesota; Laura Fidler, Fairview, Illinois; Addison Fidler, Fairview, Illinois; Cody Hanold, Bowling Green, Missouri; Mike VanMaanen, Bowling Green, Missouri; Neil Bouray, Mankato, Kansas; Justin French, Broken Bow, Nebraska, and Burwell, Nebraska; Rich Robertson, Crawford, Nebraska; Alicia Robertson, Crawford, Nebraska; Devon Baum, Elgin, Nebraska; Jay Nordhausen, Ogallala, Nebraska, and North Platte, Nebraska; Jeff Ebersdorfer, Mitchell, South Dakota; Molly Ebersdorfer, Mitchell, South Dakota; Larry Schnell, Dickinson, North Dakota; Jake Billington, Twin Falls, Idaho; Sara Evans, Paris, Kentucky; Randel Arnett, Paris, Kentucky; Steve Sterchi, Oakland, Kentucky; Jim Akers, Lexington, Kentucky; Jackson Tolle, Maysville, Kentucky; Mark Barnett, Guthrie, Kentucky; Wade Leist, Boyne City, Michigan; Josh LeMaster, Gaffney, South Carolina; Amanda LeMaster, Gaffney, South Carolina; Chris Boerjan, Wister, Oklahoma; Ben Hale, Woodward, Oklahoma; Seth Hale, Woodward, Oklahoma; Bracken Marburger, Milano, Texas; Stephanie Marburger, Milano, Texas; Teto Medina Wallace, Santa Teresa, New Mexico; John Robertson, Coleman, Texas; Christi Robertson, Coleman, Texas; Mandy Geistweidt, Fredericksburg, Texas; Brian Glick, Belleville, Pennsylvania; Heidi Nicholas, Loganton, Pennsylvania; Chad McNew, Greencastle, Pennsylvania; Jeff Showalter, Staunton, Pennsylvania; Beth Showalter, Staunton, Pennsylvania; Nick Boyer, Staunton, Pennsylvania; and Kristina Boyer, Staunton, Pennsylvania.

    About the Livestock Marketing Association

    The Livestock Marketing Association, headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas, is North America’s leading, national trade association dedicated to serving its members in the open and competitive auction method of marketing livestock. Founded in 1947, LMA has more than 800 member businesses across the U.S. and Canada and remains invested in both the livestock and livestock marketing industries through member support, education programs, policy representation and communication efforts.ional packer, would support both markets and processors — while benefiting the producers who rely on these services.

    A solution was recently reintroduced in the 119th Congress. The Amplifying Processing of Livestock in the United States, or the A-PLUS Act, and Expanding Local Meat Processing Act (HR 1648 and SB 782), would allow livestock market owners to invest in small and regional packers.

    Supporting the bills was just one reason Livestock Marketing Association, or LMA, members gathered in Washington, D.C., March 9-11. Throughout their annual fly-in, the group also advocated for key Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions to be extended before expiring. They also expressed thanks for Congress passing Livestock Dealer Statutory Trust in 2020, which improves recovery when livestock dealers default.

    For first-time participant Teto Medina Wallace, who is manager and lead auctioneer for Santa Teresa Livestock Auction in New Mexico, it was an unforgettable experience — and one he cannot recommend enough to fellow LMA members.

    “I came here with high expectations, but this has completely blown me away,” Medina Wallace said. “The quality of everything we’ve done and what I’ve learned… Just being in the halls of the heart and arteries of our nation has been something that has moved me tremendously.”

    Nicholas agreed.

    “I’m 66 years old and it’s the first time I’ve ever been to D.C.,” she said. “So, to be able to tour the Capitol and be in the agricultural committee room of the House of Representatives. It was so intriguing.”

    Additionally, the two participants enjoyed the connections they made, both with policymakers and their fellow LMA members. Both were able to extend personal invitations to elected officials to visit their auction markets firsthand. They also had the rare opportunity to talk shop with other livestock marketers from 20 different states across the U.S.

    Wallace Medina said he was impressed by the group’s ability to come together and work toward common goals, even though their operations may have differences.

    LMA President Mike VanMaanen, who owns Eastern Missouri Commission Co., agreed.

    “I’m just so proud of the number of members who took time away from their busy schedules and families to come advocate for our industry on Capitol Hill,” he said. “We’re so much stronger together. The relationships built and maintained on the trip will make sure our industry’s interests are considered in federal policy decisions.”

    Members who participated in the fly-in were: Justin Cozzi, Dos Palos Y, California; Jarod Cozzi, Dos Palos Y, California; Bowdy Griffin, Galt, California; Joe Nelson, Lanesboro, Minnesota; Barb Nelson, Lanesboro, Minnesota; Laura Fidler, Fairview, Illinois; Addison Fidler, Fairview, Illinois; Cody Hanold, Bowling Green, Missouri; Mike VanMaanen, Bowling Green, Missouri; Neil Bouray, Mankato, Kansas; Justin French, Broken Bow, Nebraska, and Burwell, Nebraska; Rich Robertson, Crawford, Nebraska; Alicia Robertson, Crawford, Nebraska; Devon Baum, Elgin, Nebraska; Jay Nordhausen, Ogallala, Nebraska, and North Platte, Nebraska; Jeff Ebersdorfer, Mitchell, South Dakota; Molly Ebersdorfer, Mitchell, South Dakota; Larry Schnell, Dickinson, North Dakota; Jake Billington, Twin Falls, Idaho; Sara Evans, Paris, Kentucky; Randel Arnett, Paris, Kentucky; Steve Sterchi, Oakland, Kentucky; Jim Akers, Lexington, Kentucky; Jackson Tolle, Maysville, Kentucky; Mark Barnett, Guthrie, Kentucky; Wade Leist, Boyne City, Michigan; Josh LeMaster, Gaffney, South Carolina; Amanda LeMaster, Gaffney, South Carolina; Chris Boerjan, Wister, Oklahoma; Ben Hale, Woodward, Oklahoma; Seth Hale, Woodward, Oklahoma; Bracken Marburger, Milano, Texas; Stephanie Marburger, Milano, Texas; Teto Medina Wallace, Santa Teresa, New Mexico; John Robertson, Coleman, Texas; Christi Robertson, Coleman, Texas; Mandy Geistweidt, Fredericksburg, Texas; Brian Glick, Belleville, Pennsylvania; Heidi Nicholas, Loganton, Pennsylvania; Chad McNew, Greencastle, Pennsylvania; Jeff Showalter, Staunton, Pennsylvania; Beth Showalter, Staunton, Pennsylvania; Nick Boyer, Staunton, Pennsylvania; and Kristina Boyer, Staunton, Pennsylvania.

    About the Livestock Marketing Association

    The Livestock Marketing Association, headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas, is North America’s leading, national trade association dedicated to serving its members in the open and competitive auction method of marketing livestock. Founded in 1947, LMA has more than 800 member businesses across the U.S. and Canada and remains invested in both the livestock and livestock marketing industries through member support, education programs, policy representation and communication efforts.

  • $20,000 in Student Scholarships Offered by Purina Animal Nutrition

    Purina Animal Nutrition, along with the Land O’Lakes Foundation, has reopened its annual scholarship program designed to assist students with experience in livestock production and animal stewardship in pursuing their passions and furthering their education.

    Undergraduate students and current high school seniors who have experience raising and caring for small or large livestock, equine and/or poultry are eligible to apply for a $5,000 scholarship. Four students will be awarded based on applications that illustrate the impact animal agriculture has had on their lives along with details on academic achievements, leadership skills, community involvement and a clear vision for their future.

    Scholarship applications will be accepted March 18 through April 17, and awardees will be notified in June. Funds will be distributed for the Fall 2025 semester at their current or anticipated educational institution. The scholarship is open to all high school seniors who plan to enroll in full-time undergraduate study at an accredited two- or four-year college, university or vocational-technical school for the entire upcoming academic semester/term and undergraduate students enrolled in an accredited two- or four-year college, university or vocational-technical school.

    To learn more about and apply to the Purina Animal Nutrition Scholarship, visit https://www.purinamills.com/scholarship.


    About Purina Animal Nutrition
    Purina Animal Nutrition LLC (www.purinamills.com) is a national organization serving animal owners and their families through more than 4,700 local cooperatives, independent dealers, and other retailers throughout the United States. Driven to unlock the greatest potential in every animal, the company is an industry-leading innovator offering a valued portfolio of complete feeds, supplements, premixes, ingredients and specialty technologies for all animal markets. Purina Animal Nutrition LLC is headquartered in Arden Hills, Minn. and a wholly owned subsidiary of Land O’Lakes, Inc.
  • Opportunities for Tree Nuts, Dairy & Wine in Upcoming Peru Agribusiness Trade Mission

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service is accepting applications for its agribusiness trade mission to Lima, Peru, scheduled for June 9-12, 2025. Current and potential U.S. exporters interested in participating must apply by March 12, 2025.

    “Consumers in Peru are eager to stock their pantries with world-class, high-quality food and farm products, and this mission offers a unique opportunity for U.S. exporters to meet that growing demand,” said Foreign Agricultural Service Administrator Daniel Whitley. “It will also help our agricultural community forge meaningful partnerships and unlock new avenues for growth in South America.”

    Peru is the third-largest market for U.S. agricultural exports in South America. Since the 2009 U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement, bilateral agricultural trade has risen from $1.46 billion to $5 billion in 2023, a 242.5 percent increase. In 2023, the United States was Peru’s second-largest agricultural supplier with a 13-percent market share.

    Peru and its South American trade partners offer robust logistics, distribution, processing, and cold chain capabilities, creating opportunities for exporters across industry sectors, including:

    • Beef, pork, poultry and related products
    • Dairy products
    • Tree nuts
    • Snack, bakery and confectionery products
    • Wine and distilled spirits
    • Condiments and sauces
    • Dog and cat food
    • Health-conscious foods (low-sodium, low-sugar, low-fat)
    • Ethanol
    • Live animals and feed ingredients
    • Bulk products, including pulses

    During the trade mission, participants will join buyers from Peru, Bolivia, and Ecuador for targeted business-to-business meetings to explore and discuss potential business opportunities in each country. Foreign Agricultural Service staff and regional experts will also provide in-depth market briefings, lead informative site visits, and host networking events.

    For more information or to apply, visit www.fas.usda.gov/topics/trade-missions/peru-june-2025. The application deadline is Wednesday, March 12, 2025.

    The trade mission to Peru is one of several USDA-led export promotion opportunities in 2025, with additional missions planned to Côte d’Ivoire, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and Taiwan. The agency will announce application details for these missions soon.

  • Foodservice Team Gets the RancHER Perspective at California Beef Council Pasture to Plate Tour

    “What happens in the day-to-day operation of a ranch?”

    “How do you protect your livestock and promote animal welfare?”

    “What environmental and conservation practices are you doing on your ranch that are sustainable?”

    “What are the benefits of raising cattle for beef and dairy products?”

    When people have questions about how food actually gets to the table, where they get their answers is important. Each year, the California Beef Council (CBC) invites retail and foodservice professionals to get answers to their questions firsthand—from the people who actually raise cattle for beef and dairy products in California. These Pasture to Plate Beef Tours bring food industry professionals face-to-face with beef and dairy producers in multiple segments of the supply chain. Recently, the CBC hosted 18 members of the foodservice team for Southern California’s largest theme park.

    “Tour attendees represent culinary, sourcing, and sustainability teams,” said Christie Van Egmond, CBC’s Director of Retail and Foodservice Marketing. “This tour provides an inside look at the beef supply chain and gives our tour guests a chance to learn more about wholesome, nutritious beef by interacting with the people who raise beef cattle and operate dairy farms in California.”

    One of the most anticipated events at last week’s CBC Pasture to Plate tour was the FarmHER & RancHER panel, a lively discussion featuring some of California’s most engaged women working on the front lines of animal agriculture. Moderated by San Diego-area rancher and the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association’s 2023 Advocate of the Year Alli Fender, the panel included Fulbright Scholar and award-winning Fresno County rancher and entrepreneur Rizpah Bellard, 4th generation Fresno County rancher and direct-to-consumer beef business owner Brooke Helsel, and 4th generation Modesto-area dairy farmer and tenured Dairy Science professor Nicole Morris.

    As Fender noted, while the panelists are all in the cattle business, each has a very different background and unique operation, and so the discussion began there. Dairy farmer Nicole Morris noted that many of the attendees must be wondering why she is on a panel about beef. While her primary focus is producing milk every single day, “dairy-beef crosses contribute about 20% of the actual beef that’s produced here in California and the U.S., so we play a small part in beef production,” she said. In addition to dairy farming, Morris is a professor of dairy science and animal science at Modesto Junior College, and coach of the college’s national championship dairy cattle judging team.

    “My brothers and I were raised in the industry up in Northern California outside of Davis,” said second generation rancher Rizpah Bellard. “We’re not like your typical cattle ranchers in California, and I think that adds to the flavor that I bring to the industry—to show that it’s for everybody.”

    Day-to-day operations, while mundane to a rancher, were eye-opening to attendees, as was the fact that many ranchers also have additional jobs. “My mom is on the ranch 365—every single day,” said fourth generation rancher Brooke Helsel. Both Helsel and her husband have outside jobs–she is with an animal health firm, and he works on another ranch. “My husband and I and our two boys live on the ranch, but mom does 95% of what we do on the ranch day-to-day.” The big days, like branding and shipping cattle, involve the entire family, including the kids.

    Morris noted that they are “milking cows 365 days a year, but that means we’re also having babies (baby calves) every single day.” Her day-to-day roles on the farm include herd health and working with veterinarians, weekly herd checks, and managing the breeding and reproduction program. “Genetics and reproduction are a big passion of mine. I organize all synchronization…handle all of the reproduction, and all of the herd health.”

    Day-to-day operations can also mean flexing with logistical issues. “My dad graduated college in the 80s, and he came out trying to run ag, but he wasn’t able to secure a loan to buy land,” said Bellard, “so ever since I was a kid, we’ve been nomadic kind of ranchers. We lease land and try to get long-term leases to put our cattle on, and if that doesn’t work out, we have to move them.” Without access to secure land, she doesn’t have access to secure sales for beef. “So I work.” Her company, Nova Farming, focuses on educating and exposing people to American and global agriculture sectors and building a bridge to agriculture as a pathway to higher education and career opportunities. Her other venture, Blynd Essence, provides housing for adults experiencing homelessness. She also works as a consultant in the area of helping small farmers access larger markets.

    In the area of sustainability, Fender asked the panelists what they each do on their different operations. “I think all of us up here as cattle producers have the best sustainability story anywhere,” said Helsel. “Cattle are the ultimate up-cyclers. They take an inedible (to humans) grass and turn it into beef…the best protein you can eat.” In addition, she noted that “first and foremost, we don’t over-graze. The land comes first. If you don’t have the land in good repair, you will not produce good beef.” She noted they also use solar for their water troughs, and that wildlife is abundant on their ranch. “I think ranchers provide a space for wildlife and a space to produce an amazing product that only benefits the land.”

    Morris agrees. “With beef cattle grazing they’re returning nutrients back to the ground; it’s full circle.” She noted in the dairy industry they don’t have access to grazing. All of their sustainability measures come primarily from recycling, like water. “All the water used on our farm (will be) used four times before it makes its way out to the field. We’re going to wash the barn down with it…we’re going to chill the milk down with our water plate coolers…we’re going to use it in our flush system…and then it’s going to go into a waste management or nutrient pond, and then it’s going to be used for fertilizer.” In addition, she continued, there are a lot of great projects going on in California with methane digesters, where methane is captured and used for alternative energy sources.

    What cattle are fed can be another part of the sustainability story, Fender noted. Her San Diego ranch has an arrangement with a craft brewery in Del Mar where the spent distiller’s grains that would just be a waste product are fed to her cattle on the ranch. Because cattle are ruminant animals, they can digest things humans can’t. “We’re able to upcycle that material into a higher protein product, and that brewer doesn’t have to go find a dump to go put it somewhere. It’s a great way to help each other out. The brewers call it ‘Brew to Moo’.” Cattle in California eat a number of agricultural by-products that would otherwise go to a landfill, such as almond hulls, citrus peels, and cotton seeds.

    “Aside from running 1,000 milking cows and 1,000 heifers on our farm, we also farm 400 acres,” Morris said. “And so we really think of ourselves as being super regenerative and sustainable because we’re growing what we’re feeding to our cows and trying to be stewards of the land.”

    Regarding animal welfare, Fender noted that there are a lot of misconceptions among the general public, and some people may not think ranchers are doing everything possible to make sure their herds are healthy. “I think one of the biggest practices that’s not understood is confinement,” Bellard said. “We confine when we’re weaning calves or taking calves off their mom. We confine them in smaller spaces to prevent them from bawling, walking the line, and not being able to eat right. At six to eight months we’re weaning them off their mom, we’re going to put them in a smaller space like four acres or five acres.” At this point, she notes, they learn to eat without mom.

    Feedlots are also misunderstood. As Fender noted, people see the cattle bunched up together even when there is more space around them. “They’re herd animals, and that’s part of their instinct,” she said.

    On the dairy side, Morris notes they utilize the National Dairy FARM program which evaluates all of their practices and protocols. On the beef side, the Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program certifies ranchers and their employees in correct animal handling and ensuring proper treatment of cattle throughout all aspects of their lives. “I do not stand for animal abuse. And we work with a licensed veterinarian, we work with a nutritionist. We have a leadership team that oversees all of our animals to make sure they’re properly cared for and handled right, because if the animal is not happy, the farmer is not happy,” Morris said.

    “Let’s just hit on BQA really quick,” Fender said, noting this is new for the audience. “It’s called Beef Quality Assurance, and its essentially a certification program that’s optional, but most ranchers do it for themselves and their employees. It’s a really valuable program, and you have to get renewed every two years. It’s a full class about animal welfare and how to take care of your cattle the best way that you can.”

    Helsel noted that one thing they have found, as they work cattle in the corrals a couple of times a year, is that “slow is fast for us. The slower you go, the quieter you are, the easier you handle these cattle, the less yelling…everything seems to work better. Cattle handle better, they’re not as stressed…honestly, I think the meat tastes better.”

    Panelists also discussed challenges in the industry, from drought and reliance on rainfall, to misperceptions about who they are and what they do as beef and dairy producers. But they also zeroed in on the positive side of more people being interested in buying from local ranchers and really getting to know where their food comes from. Bellard noted that if people want to buy from a local rancher, that rancher needs land to provide that food source. “We have land that’s being used for development…we have land being used for parks and recreation…we have people moving to the spaces not understanding what the cow poop smells like or what the flies are doing there…it’s a nuisance to them.” But these animals need room to roam, and that land is also a food source for animals other than cattle, she added.

    “A lot of kids don’t know where their food comes from,” Bellard, who also teaches kindergarten through twelfth grade students about agriculture, said. “I want young people to learn more about the ag industry so they can join us up here—so they can become producers like me.”

    In addition to the FarmHER and RancHER panel event, tour attendees visited a cow-calf ranch, dairy, calf ranch, feedyard, and beef processing facility. “Unlike other agricultural commodities, the beef supply chain is both complex and segmented,” Van Egmond said. “Tours like this allow the people who make foodservice purchasing decisions to see firsthand and better understand how all the segments of the beef supply chain work together in a way that supports the welfare of our cattle, provides open spaces and wildlife habitat, and focuses on continuously improving environmental sustainability, all while producing a delicious, nutritious protein choice.”

    CBC Pasture to Plate Beef Tours are free for California’s retail and foodservice attendees, requiring they cover only the cost of their own travel to and from the host hotel. Space for these events is limited. For more information about the Pasture to Plate Beef Tour, contact Christie Van Egmond at christie@calbeef.org.

    About the California Beef Council

    The California Beef Council (CBC) was established in 1954 to serve as the promotion, research, and education arm of the California beef industry, and is mandated by the California Food and Agricultural Code. The CBC’s mission is to position the California beef industry for sustained beef demand growth through promotion, research and education. For more information, visit www.calbeef.org.

    About the Beef Checkoff

    The Beef Checkoff Program was established as part of the 1985 Farm Bill. The checkoff assesses $1 per head on the sale of live domestic and imported cattle, in addition to a comparable assessment on imported beef and beef products. States may retain up to 50 cents on the dollar and forward the other 50 cents per head to the Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board, which administers the national checkoff program, subject to USDA approval.

  • Sweet Molasses Feed Key to Understanding Grazing Behavior in Cattle

    Researchers tempted grazing cattle with sweet molasses feed to discover whether cows would roam far and wide to graze or stick close to the herd, water supplies and feed stations.

    The findings by animal scientists at the University of California, Davis, and published in the journal Scientific Reports, offer a low-cost way for ranchers and others to identify the best cows for their landscapes to optimize grazing while meeting the nutritional needs of cattle.

    This is the third in a series of papers about research seeking to better understand the grazing personalities of cattle. The first studies established that the cows weren’t mindless wanderers or followers but had personalities that differentiated how far and wide they would graze, said Kristina Horback, the senior author on the paper and an associate professor in the Department of Animal Science.

    “This final study is trying to figure out, ‘Can we have any early indicators so that we don’t have to put GPS collars on all cows, but just do a quick practical test?’” Horback said.

    Water quality, soil health and habitats can be degraded by cattle grazing unevenly or concentrated in specific areas. A herd with animals that wander around a landscape to graze can benefit the landscape by distributing grazing areas and defecation sites while also reducing fuel loads for wildfires.

    Routine checks yield grazing personality

    The research took place from June to August over two years at the UC Sierra Foothill Research and Extension Center in Browns Valley. Horback and others tracked 50 pregnant Angus and Hereford beef cows wearing GPS collars across the 625-acre site, which is a mix of grassland and treed areas. The elevation ranged from 600 to 2,028 feet.

    Researchers were able to predict cows’ likely grazing personalities by analyzing behavior in situations such as pregnancy checks or vaccinations, which require the cows to walk through chutes or narrow passageways.

    At the end of the chutes, the cows had two choices: go one direction to join the herd or another direction to pursue sweet molasses feed placed at different distances. The animals that moved slowly through the chutes and would go out of the way for the feed were consistently the grazing wanderers.

    “They were the ones on range that would go far and wide, that would also not really be that motivated to be closely, tightly packed with the rest of the herd,” Horback said.

    The homebodies consistently sought out the herd.

    “They would not choose that sweet molasses,” Horback said. “They would go right back to the herd as quickly as they could, and then on range, they would just stay together. They have their social group there.”

    Future generations

    Next up in the research is to see if grazing personalities pass down to later generations. Horback is looking at the female calves of the studied cows to see if they pick up on the same patterns as their moms.

    “If there are any calves who are fostered off to another cow, do they pick up the grazing patterns of their birth mom or their adopted mom?” Horback said. “There’s no guarantee that genetics alone will determine the grazing behavior of a cow, but it could increase the likelihood that a cow is a hill-climber or a bottom-dweller.”

    She is also working with colleagues in New Zealand and New Mexico to analyze blood samples from the cows that were tracked as part of related studies to see if genetic testing can provide some insight into behavior.

    UC Davis emeritus professor Juan Medrano published research a decade ago about genetic markers in cows that could indicate either hill-climbers or bottom-dwellers.

    “I hope to build on that knowledge with a larger, international dataset to understand whether grazing personalities are heritable,” Horback said.

    Maggie Creamer, who earned her Ph.D. in animal behavior at UC Davis, contributed to the research, which was supported by the Russell L. Rustici Rangeland and Cattle Research Endowment. — By Emily C. Dooley, UC Davis

  • Meat Institute Expands Legislative Affairs and Marketing Teams with New Hires

    The Meat Institute has announced the expansion of its legislative affairs and marketing teams with the addition of two new employees.

    Chris Chaffee joins the Meat Institute as Director of Legislative Affairs working with Vice President of Legislative Affairs Nathan Fretz advocating for the meat and poultry industry with members of congress and federal officials. Chaffee will also help manage the Meat Institute’s Political Action Committee, MeatPAC.

    “Chris Chaffee has extensive experience in advocacy, as well as serving in various roles across state and federal government,” said Meat Institute President and CEO Julie Anna Potts. “He will be an excellent representative of the industry with lawmakers and with the Trump Administration as we look to roll back burdensome regulations and address other concerns.”

    Previously, Chaffee led efforts to promote the leadership of American agriculture as Director of Industry Relations with the U.S. Farming and Ranching Foundation. Prior to that, he served as Associate Director of the White House Office of Public Liaison in the Trump Administration, where he led outreach to the food and agricultural community and coordinated policy communications across multiple federal agencies. In addition, Chaffee has served at the state government level, including for Iowa’s economic development agency and the governor of New Jersey. A Kansas City native, Chaffee graduated from the University of Kansas with a degree in finance and international business.

    Brian Peteritas has been hired as Marketing Manager for the Meat Institute to oversee the Institute’s email marketing and social media efforts with a focus on integrated marketing campaigns for events.

    “The Meat Institute is always looking for ways to share educational events and networking opportunities with our membership and beyond,” said Julie Anna Potts. “Brian’s expertise in digital marketing will help us to better promote the programming our generous sponsors provide for our members’ continuous improvement.”

    Peteritas has worked in the association world for nine years and was previously with the American Frozen Food Institute and the National Apartment Association. He earned his B.A. in Communications from Penn State University and also holds a Digital Marketing Professional certificate from the Digital Marketing Institute and the American Marketing Association. Brian resides in Fort Lauderdale, FL.

    About the Meat Institute
    The Meat Institute represents the full community of people and companies who make the majority of meat American families rely on every day. The Meat Institute’s hands-on regulatory and technical expertise, proactive advocacy, unique convening power, collaboration within and beyond animal agriculture, and sector-leading continuous improvement initiatives drive relationships and resources that ensure meat continues to be a vital, trusted pillar of healthy diets and thriving communities for generations to come. To learn more, visit: MeatInstitute.org.

  • California Pork Producers Association Names New Executive Director

    The California Pork Producers Association (CPPA) announced the appointment of Mackenzie Bressler as the association’s new Executive Director, effective February 3, 2025. In her role, Bressler will lead CPPA’s efforts to support California’s pork producers and strengthen the state’s pork industry.

    Bressler brings a wealth of experience in communications, association management and outreach in California agriculture to CPPA. She most recently served as External Relations Director at Chico State’s College of Agriculture and previously served as a digital marketing manager at Farmers Communications Exchange.

    “Mackenzie brings the perfect combination of passion for California agriculture, experience with agricultural associations and communicating with diverse audiences to her role at California Pork Producers Association,” said Shelby Sopocy, swine facility manager at University of California, Davis, and CPPA president.

    A native of Colusa, California, Bressler’s interest in agriculture was sparked through her early involvement in 4-H and FFA. She earned a bachelor’s degree in agricultural communications at California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo.

    “I’m excited for the opportunity to work with the entire California pork industry, representing and serving pork producers, collaborating with industry stakeholders and making connections with youth members and others about the important role pork plays in nutrition and the economy of our state,” said Bressler.

    CPPA was incorporated in the 1950s. In 2021, the executive director role was added to provide state-level leadership within California. The state is home to less than 1% of pork production, but its residents comprise about 13% of total U.S. pork consumption.

    About California Pork Producers Association
    The California Pork Producers Association (CPPA) is led by a board of directors elected by active membership with a focus on grassroots engagement, advocacy, outreach and education and product promotion. For more information, visit www.calpork.com or e-mail info@calpork.com.

  • Recycling Human & Animal Excreta Could Help Meet Nutrient Supply for Global Crops

    It might not be a pleasant image, but recycling all the human and livestock feces and urine on the planet would contribute substantially to meeting the nutrient supply for all crops worldwide, thereby reducing the need to mine fertilizers such as phosphorus and dramatically reducing the dependency on fossil fuels, according to a global analysis of nutrient recycling published Nov. 26 in Nature Sustainability.

    “We have to find ways to recycle the nutrients that are now poorly utilized, and our data shows that there is a lot of it: Many countries could become self-sufficient at current fertilizer use if they would recycle excreta to agriculture,” said Johannes Lehmann, the Liberty Hyde Bailey Professor in the School of Integrative Plant Science, in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS), and the study’s senior author.

    The lead author is doctoral student Mariana Devault, and Dominic Woolf, a senior research associate in the School of Integrative Plant Science Soil and Crop Sciences Section (CALS) is a co-author.

    The researchers analyzed a large array of datasets retrieved from various databases, including the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization’s FAOSTAT and the International Fertilizer Association’s STAT, as well as satellite-based maps, to identify the locations of crops and livestock, and learn which fertilizers, and how much of them, are being used in as many as 146 countries.

    “A major aspect of our study is estimating these nutrient flows at the subnational scale in every country prior to making conclusions at the national and global scales,” Devault said. “Knowing that the cost of transportation is a barrier for an agronomically sound use of livestock excreta in many areas, we wanted to estimate how much of these nutrients has been poorly used simply to reduce operational costs at the farms. Then, we can imagine alternative ways to better manage the use of livestock excreta locally, which can help improve nutrient circularity nationally and worldwide.”

    After calculating the locations and quantities of nutrients accruing in excreta from humans and livestock, the team modeled how much of this waste, if recycled, would be needed to satisfy crop and grassland production systems worldwide.

    The analysis showed that the global amounts found in human and poorly utilized livestock excreta represent 13% of crop and grassland needs for major nutrients. National recycling of those nutrients could reduce global net imports of mineral fertilizers by 41% for nitrogen, 3% for phosphorus and 36% for potassium.

    The use of recycled excreta, Lehmann said, would have additional benefits, such as diverting waste nutrient runoff from entering local water sources, where it becomes a pollutant – for example, the harmful algal blooms found in the Finger Lakes. Nutrient recycling could also help establish a circular economy between food consumption and agriculture.

    “It doesn’t make any sense to pollute our environment, especially our waters and soils, and then have not enough fertilizer for agriculture,” Lehmann said. “We need to close the loop from poorly utilized nutrients, wherever they come from, and in this paper, we show that taking only two of these feedstock types, animal excreta and human excreta, we could theoretically satisfy all our fertilizer use at present.”

    Lehmann sees the urgency of meeting global fertilizer needs as a geopolitical issue comparable to that of oil, with the vast majority of phosphorus, a nonrenewable resource, mined in very few countries. Nitrogen, similarly, is expensive and requires a great deal of energy to commercially produce, creating a large greenhouse-gas footprint.

    “The basic fact is that any nutrient that we remove in agriculture, and we obviously remove a lot, we have to replenish,” he said. “There’s no free lunch.”

    Without the aid of recycling, eventual nutrient scarcities will only drive up the price of fertilizer and eventually food, risking increased migrations and political unrest, Lehmann said.

    While there may be public perception issues related to using fertilizer derived from human urine and feces, establishing a circular economy between food consumption and agriculture will be critical as the global food system will need to accommodate close to 10 billion people by 2050.

    “There are many countries in the world that flush down more nitrogen in the toilet than they import or add as agricultural fertilizer on their lands, and I think that’s a crime,” Lehmann said. — David Nutt, Cornell University

  • Feeding Grazing Cattle Seaweed Cuts Methane Emissions by Almost 40%

    Seaweed is once again showing promise for making cattle farming more sustainable. A new study by researchers at the University of California, Davis, found that feeding grazing beef cattle a seaweed supplement in pellet form reduced their methane emissions by almost 40% without affecting their health or weight. The study was published today (Dec. 2) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    This is the first study to test seaweed on grazing beef cattle in the world. It follows previous studies that showed seaweed cut methane emissions 82% in feedlot cattle and over 50% in dairy cows.

    How much methane do cattle produce?

    Livestock account for 14.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with the largest portion coming from methane that cattle release when they burp. Grazing cattle also produce more methane than feedlot cattle or dairy cows because they eat more fiber from grass. In the U.S., there are 9 million dairy cows and over 64 million beef cattle.

    Ermias Kebreab, Professor in the Department of Animal Science, UC Davis

    “Beef cattle spend only about three months in feedlots and spend most of their lives grazing on pasture and producing methane,” said senior author Ermias Kebreab, professor in the Department of Animal Science. “We need to make this seaweed additive or any feed additive more accessible to grazing cattle to make cattle farming more sustainable while meeting the global demand for meat.”

    Difficulty in lowering grazing cattle emissions

    Kebreab said that daily feeding of pasture-based cattle is more difficult than feedlot or dairy cows because they often graze far from ranches for long periods. However, during the winter or when grass is scarce, ranchers often supplement their diet.

    For this study, researchers divided 24 beef steers (a mix of Angus and Wagyu breeds) into two groups: one received the seaweed supplement, and the other did not. Researchers conducted the 10-week experiment at a ranch in Dillon, Montana. Since these were grazing cattle, they ate the supplement voluntarily, which still resulted in a nearly 40% cut in emissions.

    Most research to reduce methane emissions using feed additives have taken place in controlled environments with daily supplements. But Kebreab noted in the study that fewer than half of those methods are effective for grazing cattle.

    “This method paves the way to make a seaweed supplement easily available to grazing animals,” said Kebreab. “Ranchers could even introduce the seaweed through a lick block for their cattle.”

    Kebreab said pastoral farming, which includes large grazing systems, supports millions of people around the world, often in areas vulnerable to climate change. This study suggests a way to make cattle grazing better for the environment and play a role in fighting climate change.

    A related article in the same PNAS issue highlights the need to improve the efficiency of livestock production in low- and middle-income countries using better genetics, feeding and health practices. UC Davis Professor and Cooperative Extension Specialist Alison Van Eenennaam, the article’s author, said it is the most promising approach to meet the global demand for meat while limiting greenhouse gas emissions.

    Other authors of the seaweed study include UC Davis postdoctoral researchers Paulo de Méo Filho Paulo Meo-Filho and John-Fredy Ramirez-Agudelo.

    The research was supported by Matador Ranch in Dillon, Montana. — By Amy Quinton, UC Davis