Tag: Safe Food Alliance

  • Hillari Bynum Promoted to Senior Position at DFA of California and Safe Food Alliance

    DFA of California and Safe Food Alliance recently announced the promotion of Hillari Bynum to Senior Director, Growth and Innovation. In this newly expanded leadership role, Hillari will oversee the organization’s growth-focused functions, including business development, marketing, customer experience, technology enablement and innovation initiatives.

    “Hillari has consistently demonstrated the ability to look beyond traditional marketing and identify opportunities to strengthen our organization. From relaunching Safe Food California to leading technology initiatives, she has helped modernize how we serve our members and customers,” said Brendan O’Donnell, President and CEO of DFA of California and Safe Food Alliance.

    Reflecting on her new role, Hillari shared, “By combining three teams into one cohesive organization with two clear mandates, we’re creating a stronger, more aligned team that can move faster, innovate more effectively, and deliver greater value to our customers and
    members.”

    — Story contributed by the DFA of California and Safe Food Alliance

  • New Pilot Program for Walnut Inspections Could be a Game-Changer for Entire Tree Nut Industry

    California walnut growers have been wanting to see more consistency on incoming inspections, and DFA of California has been leading the charge to deliver on that. Brendan O’Donnell, President of DFA of California met with Matthew Malcolm on California Ag Network to share details on a new pilot program in walnuts that has been implemented this season that could be a game changer for the entire tree nut industry. Watch the interview and read more about it in Pacific Nut Producer Magazine.

  • Safe Food California Conference Returning After Six Year Hiatus

    Food safety professionals in the dried fruit, nut and fresh fruit industries will be gathering in Monterey this June for DFA of California’s Safe Food Conference.  This annual event finally returns after a six-year hiatus.  Watch this video as Hillari Bynum from DFA of California shares more details about the conference with Matthew Malcolm on California Ag Network and what food safety professionals have long awaited.

    Please thank this video’s sponsor  SQM Specialty Plant Nutrition for their industry support.

  • Brendan O’Donnell Selected as President/CEO of DFA and Safe Food Alliance

    DFA of California and Safe Food Alliance are pleased to announce the appointment of Brendan O’Donnell as their new President and CEO, effective August 1st, 2024. Brendan brings over two decades of extensive leadership experience in the food and agriculture industry, marked by his commitment to innovation, food safety, and sustainable practices.

    Prior to joining DFA and Safe Food Alliance, Brendan served as Global Segment Director, Nuts & Citrus at TOMRA Food, where he led global teams and spearheaded customer-focused product development initiatives. His tenure at TOMRA showcased his strategic acumen and ability to drive growth through effective leadership and market insights.

    “Looking ahead, we are very pleased with the appointment of Brendan O’Donnell to succeed Vaughn as President & CEO. Brendan has demonstrated extraordinary communication and leadership skills in his roles at TOMRA and Monte Vista Farming Company. These skills, along with his technical background, make him an excellent fit to lead the DFA/Safe Food Alliance organization,” said Brian Dunning, President & CEO
    of ShoEi Foods USA and current Chair of the DFA Board. “His vision aligns perfectly with our commitment to supporting the dried fruit, tree nut, and specialty crop industries, and I am confident in his ability to enhance our member services and strengthen our industry partnerships.”

    Throughout his career, Brendan has held pivotal roles at Monte Vista Farming Company and Sun Valley Rice, where he contributed significantly to business growth and market expansion. He holds an Executive Certificate in Negotiation from the University of Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business and a B.S. in Agricultural Systems and Environment from the University of California, Davis.

    “I am honored to join DFA and Safe Food Alliance at such an exciting time in our industry,” said Brendan O’Donnell. “I look forward to leveraging my experience to drive innovation, strengthen food safety standards, and support our members and partners as we navigate new opportunities and challenges ahead.”

    In addition to his professional achievements, Brendan is dedicated to his family and enjoys exploring the outdoors with his wife, Erin, and their two teenage children.

    About DFA of California

    Founded in 1908, DFA of California is a non-profit trade association dedicated to supporting the dried fruit, tree nut, and specialty crop industries. DFA supports processors through rigorous inspection services, member benefits, food safety training, and provides support on numerous export related matters. For more information, visit DFA of California.

    About Safe Food Alliance

    Safe Food Alliance provides a comprehensive range of food safety services designed specifically for food processors and manufacturers throughout California. As a full service food safety company, Safe Food Alliance provides third-party laboratory testing, complemented by extensive food safety training, consulting services, and third-party certification audits offered through a separate company, Safe Food Certifications.

  • EU Proposes New MRL Regulation on Imported Pistachios

    It appears that aflatoxin will not be the only naturally occurring mold sabotaging pistachio shipments destined for the European Union.  The EU is proposing a new MRL regulation on Ochratoxin A in pistachio imports to go into effect January 1, 2023. But what is Ochratoxin A and what should the pistachio industry know about this? Watch this brief interview with Thomas Jones from the Safe Food Alliance as he explains.  Read more about it in Pacific Nut Producer Magazine.
    Please thank this video’s sponsor Trece for their industry support.
  • Clarification of New Farm Water Testing Requirements Under FSMA

    For those agricultural commodities that are subject to the new Produce Safety Rule under the Food Safety Modernization Act, water testing will be a key component in this adjustment.  In some cases, these water testing requirements may include more than just what you are irrigating the crop with.  Watch this brief interview with Tom Jones from the Safe Food Alliance as he clarifies these requirements.

     

    Please thank our sponsor Duarte Nursery for their industry support by visiting them at their booth at the following November Events: Tree & Vine Expo, the Grape, Nut & Tree Fruit Expo & Blue Diamond Growers Annual Membership Meeting.

  • How to Manage Growers: FSMA Produce Safety Rule for Processors

    Let’s face it, all of our food comes from farms. When it comes to plant-based food there’s always a grower (or many growers!) involved.

    Here at Safe Food Alliance, we work to, help growers implement processes to ensure compliance with the FSMA Produce Safety rule (FSMA is the FDA’s “Food Safety Modernization Act”). Many of our customers are also processors who buy a raw agricultural commodity (‘RAC’) from growers, and are reevaluating how they “manage” these growers as part of their supplier approval/ supplier management program.

    As it stands, if you are a processor that purchases directly from growers you should be considering a review of your company’s grower management programs, with the following objectives in mind:

    1. Meeting FSMA regulatory requirements
    2. Meeting your customer requirements and food safety audit requirements
    3. Protecting your operation by reducing risk

    Assessing Risk & Defining Controls

    At the most basic level, any food processor should be making sure that their suppliers and the products purchased comply with current regulations and are safe. This includes packaging suppliers, ingredient suppliers, and raw materials like agricultural commodities. This doesn’t mean that you have to physically audit all of your suppliers; it doesn’t even mean that you have to get a copy of a third-party audit from all of them. Food safety is always based on risk, so as a processor, you need to determine the level of risk posed by the raw material, then based on that assessment determine what controls are needed.

    If this sounds a lot like HACCP or Preventive Controls, that’s because it is. Based on your hazard analysis you determine what needs to be done to reduce risk and help ensure the safety of your products, and to ultimately protect the future of your company.

    With produce, processors should always identify the risk of pathogens in their hazard analysis. Remember that any produce may bear this risk, since it’s grown outside. Additionally, there may be physical hazards that a company will have to contend with in its internal operations. Lastly, an assessment of likely chemical risks, such as pesticides, has to be done.

    Evaluating Each Type of Risk

    HIGHER RISK

    Products that are higher risk will require the highest level of verification to help minimize any risk. High-risk products might include anything such as  an annual crop grown directly on the ground, or anything eaten fresh without a processing step that would significantly reduce pathogens. Imported items may also bear a higher risk, depending on the country of origin and their local practices and regulations, and may need extra verification activities.

    Examples: Leafy greens, fresh fruit, some imported items

    Potential Controls: Third-party GAP audit, or full on-site review of programs conducted by your company. Confirm compliance with FSMA Produce Safety rule, as well as industry best practices, potentially to include review of growers’ records. Sampling and testing of product on a defined schedule will generally need to be conducted as well.


    LOWER RISK:

    Tree crops or other items grown off the ground, and items with no history of past recalls.  Other factors to consider: local or domestically grown items, or crops over which the processor has direct oversight (vertically integrated companies) may have lower risk.

    Examples: Dried fruit or other items with minimal past food safety issues, some tree nuts, items that are always heat treated or processed in some way prior to consumption. In some cases, these items may qualify for an exemption from FSMA (see below).

    Potential Controls: Grower completes a questionnaire or your employee works with them to complete one; review of the grower’s food safety plan; short on-site visit to review practices / observe.

    Exempt: There are a few exemptions built into the FSMA Produce Safety rule. For these items, an exemption may be taken per the regulation, or they can be treated as low risk as outlined above.  These include:
    1. Produce on the “rarely consumed raw” list
    2. Produce on individual consumption or on-farm consumption (not for sale)
    3. Produce the receives a commercial processing step which would significantly reduce pathogens

    Examples: Tomatoes for paste or canning, peaches or olives for canning, California-grown almonds treated per the marketing order, wine grapes used for wine (not eaten).

    Potential Controls: Documentation to demonstrate qualification for exemption.  This implicitly requires that the processing step be validated as a “kill step”, it can’t just be assumed that it is effective.

    FDA’s Focus Areas for Risk Management in Produce

    There are a few specific focus areas built into the rule, where the FDA and industry working groups have identified potential risks related to agricultural products. These are the focus areas of the Produce Safety rule that can be reviewed with growers you purchase from:

    1. Personnel training and qualification: This section is mainly focused on personal hygiene, harvesting activities, handling product, and relevant employee training.
    2. Agricultural water quality: The most controversial section, this one is still under review by FDA for discussion with the industry as they consider potential changes. Requires growers to establish and maintain a “microbial water quality profile”, utilizing specific test methods for generic E. coli.  Compliance dates for these requirements are delayed for a few more years.
    3. Soil amendments: Focuses mainly on soil amendments of animal origin, and controlling associated risks. This control can be achieved through treatment of those amendments, or timing of application of raw amendments well in advance of harvest.  No soil amendments should ever come into contact with the harvestable portion of the crop.
    4. Domesticated and wild animals: Requires monitoring for animal activity which may put product at risk, and taking appropriate actions if observed.
    5. Growing, harvesting, packing and holding activities: Focused on how activities are carried out related to product risk, such as handling practices.
    6. Equipment, tools, buildings, and sanitation for processing operations: Design and maintenance of equipment, tools and facilities; cleaning and sanitation; pest control; etc.

    Low-Cost Training Available

    If you are responsible for purchasing raw agricultural commodities, or handle the “grower relations” function, consider attending the official one-day produce safety course and become familiar with the requirements of the rule. After attending the course you’ll receive an official certificate from AFDO.  Safe Food Alliance currently offers this course in various locations at low cost this spring.

  • What is FDA Detention and What Do We Do About it?

    Detention; a word associated with childhood pranks, the principal’s office, guilt, and remorse. In a similar fashion, receiving notice from the United States (US) government that your facility’s products have been detained can also trigger those negative childhood emotions.

    FDA Detention Explained

    Detention occurs when products entering the US are refused entry; either by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or the US Customs and Border Patrol, acting on the FDA’s behalf. These detentions occur because the FDA has reason to believe that the products do not conform to US laws and regulations. The specific issues that can cause detention include:

    • adulteration/contamination
    • mislabeled or misbranded product
    • manufacturing
    • processing or packing under unsanitary conditions
    • importing products that are forbidden for sale

    Some of these detentions are the result of the FDA’s Import Alert List. This list is based upon FDA surveillance of imported products and detected patterns of noncompliance. Most listings take the form of a Red List Import Alert, in which specific firms from a certain country have a pattern of non-compliance and thus are added to the Alert. Once listed, any future products imported from that firm will be detained without physical examination (DWPE). Such products will be detained by the FDA until it can be shown that they are safe and meet pre-approved standards.

    In Action

    In some cases, Red List Import Alerts apply to products from an entire country. In 2007, the FDA traced pet deaths in the US to melamine contamination of wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate from China. During the investigation, more than 150 brands of pet food were recalled as a result of the mislabeled ingredient. Melamine, a molecule used as an industrial binding agent, flame retardant, and fertilizer, caused over 17,000 consumer complaints, 1950 deaths of cats and 2200 deaths of dogs. The devastating mistake resulted in Import Alert # 99-29 “Detention without Physical Examination of All Vegetable Protein Products from China for Animal or Human Food Use Due to the Presence of Melamine and/or Undeclared Colors”.  Districts were directed to detain all shipments with vegetable protein products to prevent the products from continuing to contaminate pet foods. Since this import alert was issued, over twenty Chinese firms producing these products have been added to the Green List, meaning they have met the compliance requirements of the FDA and are no longer subject to DWPE.

    Applying The Rule

    Any firm importing food products from abroad is strongly encouraged to familiarize themselves with the FDA Import Alert List. The list can be searched by country, industry, alert number and last published date. Within each alert, the details of the product types, firms subject to DWPE, and the specific product violations related to the alert are listed. Notices may indicate DWPE with surveillance, meaning that the FDA will be doing spot inspection and testing of those products.

    Key Alerts for Detention without Physical Examination are:

    • aflatoxin in food products (#23-14)
    • pesticides in raw agricultural commodities (#99-05)
    • and in processed foods (#99-15)
    • Salmonella in food products (#99-19)
    • sulfites in food products (#99-21)

    Reviewing this list allows you to make an informed choice of which firms to do business with and what types of product testing or evaluations to require from the seller prior to shipment. This can prevent the headache associated with a detained shipment, saving you time and money.

    At Safe Food Alliance, we have been handling FDA product detentions for over a decade. Product detention in our facility primarily involves adulteration and contamination. In terms of specific issues cited in the detentions that have been examined by Safe Food Alliance, aflatoxin has been the most common (45%), followed by pesticides (19%), pathogens (16%), quality/filth (16%) and claims of organoleptic issues/rancidity (2%). The remaining 2% of cases have involved mislabeling due to sulfite residues. Tree nuts, dried fruits, and seeds/seed pastes are the commodities which having the most violations.

    fda detention chart

    The most common example we encounter is tree nuts that fail to pass the importing nations’ aflatoxin limits and are returned to California. The FDA will typically notify the “responsible parties” of the violation by issuing a Notice of FDA Action. In our tree nut example, this is usually the handler or broker who originally shipped the load and to whom it has been returned.

    How To Handle An FDA Notice

    Step 1: If you receive a notice read it immediately and carefully!

    Step 2: Understand the terminology

    Hearing – A hearing is your opportunity to present evidence, or testimony, to overcome the appearance of a violation and to give FDA confidence that the product is in compliance. The hearing will vary from a series of email or telephone conversations to a more formal meeting.  The hearing officer is generally the FDA compliance officer listed on the Notice of Detention and Hearing.

    Testimony – Testimony is any information you wish to submit to overcome the appearance of the violation, or to otherwise support the release of your product.  Testimony should be provided to the contact that is listed on the Notice of FDA Action, usually a compliance officer.

    Charges – Charges are the reason the shipment has been detained by the FDA. Reasons include adulteration, misbranding, and restricted for sale.

    Respond by Date – The “respond by” date is the amount of time to provide testimony. If the FDA does not receive a response to the detention within the specified timeframe, the compliance officer can issue a refusal of admission.

    Definitions from https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ImportProgram/ActionsEnforcement/ucm459476.htm

    Step 3: Create a plan

    The Notice of FDA Action will cite the specific laws and regulations that appear to have been violated and are known as the charges. The FDA allows the responsible party the chance to either submit evidence to overcome the charges or submit a request to recondition the product to correct the violation. If you choose to submit evidence, known as testimony, it must be provided by the specific date listed on the Notice. This respond by date is typically 10 business days/20 calendar days from the detention date. Such testimony is typically provided in emails, telephone calls and/or hard copies and is addressed to the FDA Compliance Officer listed on the Notice. This process is known as the hearing.

    In the case of our ill-fated tree nut shipment, the testimony will typically take the form of product sampling and testing, to show that the products meet US limits for aflatoxin and can be allowed entry. In this case, it is critical that our laboratory is notified immediately so that we can begin the process of getting the products cleared.

    Step 4: Get your product tested

    It is of critical importance to work with a laboratory that has experience with FDA detention. If the analytical package is not prepared according to the FDA’s strict protocol and does not meet their standards for sampling and testing it will be rejected, delaying the process even further. Choosing to work with Safe Food Alliance provides you with everything you need to be successful. The testimony that Safe Food Alliance provides is more than a typical laboratory result. In addition to the regular results, you receive details about quality assurance, methods validations, technician training, and sampling plans.

    Note: It may not be possible to have your lab report completed by the initial response date given by FDA, in which case a request for extension must be made by the responsible party.

    What if the product fails to pass the testing process? The responsible party can submit a request to recondition the product to bring it into compliance. In our example, that might involve resorting the product to remove any moldy/damaged nuts. This would then be followed by the same sampling, testing and reporting process we described above. If the product still fails to pass, then your options are either to work with FDA and Customs/Border Protection to export the product from the US or destroy it. This product disposition must be completed within 90 days.

    Step 5: Submit Your Testimony

    If the testimony shows that the product is in compliance (in our example, the aflatoxin is below 20 parts per billion), then the data package is submitted for review and the wait begins for FDA to clear the product. This process can take several weeks; FDA may also request additional information from the responsible party and the laboratory.

    If this seems like a bureaucratic maze, you are right! The most important thing to remember is to read the notice immediately and gather all the facts you can about the detention. Next, reach out to the FDA Compliance Officer and determine exactly what is expected from you and when.

    Safe Food Alliance laboratories should be your next contact. The most common problem we encounter is that we are not contacted soon enough when our client receives their FDA Notice, resulting in insufficient time to assemble all of the evidence and triggering a panicked request for an extension. Tell us exactly what you have found out from the FDA and we can plan the next steps of sampling, testing and reporting the results that will clear your product. Remember, it is critical that the correct steps are taking when sampling and testing or the data will be rejected. Count on us to walk you through the process, and stop worrying about the principal’s office!

  • Safe Food Alliance Introduces Business Development Team

    Introducing the Business Development Team

    The Safe Food Alliance team is proud to introduce the newest additions to the family. Annette Magee, Juan M. Sanchez, and Joseph Nicholl now represent our Business Development team with Safe Food Alliance. Each member brings with them a unique set of skills which make them a well-rounded team ready to serve the needs of our existing and new customers.

    Annette Magee Annette Magee

    Annette Magee joins us with 20 years of marketing and business development experience in the food industry. A graduate of Boise State University with a Bachelors degree of Business Administration in Marketing, Annette has led successful product launch projects to the United States, managed entire US product portfolios, and directed strategic planning and growth efforts for the foodservice sector.

    Her experience working with big name companies like J.R. Simplot, Basic American Foods, Blue Diamond Growers and Ghirardelli, have given her not only a vast amount of knowledge in the field, but also great insight into the particular needs of food manufacturing. As the Director of Business Development, Annette is “very excited to lead the new business development team. Here at Safe Food Alliance, we have a team with tremendous food safety expertise that works very closely together”. Annette has personally selected her business development team to present a group of well-rounded individuals who together understand every piece of the food industry.

    “The food industry is very unique. It takes years of dedication and learning to truly appreciate the complexities of creating food. My experience in the industry has set me up to be our customer’s go to food safety resource. I can’t wait to get to know our customers and start serving them”.

    Juan Sanchez

    Juan Sanchez – Technical Services Manager

    Juan Sanchez comes to the team as a Technical Services Manger for the San Joaquin Valley. Based out of the Safe Food Alliance Kingsburg Center, Juan is responsible for business development, technical customer service, and customer relation efforts in the area. We are excited to add Juan to the business development team because of his deep-rooted agricultural history. Born and raised in Tulare, California, Juan’s family have been in the dairy industry his entire life. “My dad has worked in a dairy most of my life, so I would go to work with him during my summer breaks. That is where I learned to work with animals and drive ag machinery. I also spent seasons in pistachio fields, examining trees for disease and pruning during the freezing Tulare mornings”. Growing up in the industry inspired Juan to pursue a bachelor’s degree in Animal Science and Production Management at California State University, Fresno. Shortly after graduating, he started his career as an In-Process Quality Assurance Technician for California Dairies Inc., one of the California’s largest Co-Op Dairy Processors.

    For four years, Juan has used his background in agriculture to help him promote a safer food system. He comes to Safe Food Alliance ready to help companies like yours achieve food safety success. “I believe that one of the biggest things that I bring to the team is my thirst for knowledge and need to better myself. By continuously learning and keeping an open mind, I am not only helping myself, but also giving the customers the best experience that I can offer. We are a full-service company and I want to provide the best experience possible.”

    Joseph Nicholl

    Joseph Nicholl – Technical Services Manager

    Joseph joins the business development team as a Technical Services Manager with more ten years of laboratory experience. He will use this experience to assist the agriculture and food manufacturing community in the Sacramento Valley. In his role he will provide technical customer service, drive customer relation efforts, and provide solutions to the area. Joseph will also act as a resource for understanding the often-complicated laboratory industry. “With my passion for agricultural sciences and extensive technical laboratory expertise, I am able to work alongside our clients, assisting them with their needs as well as overcoming and preventing any food safety challenges they may face.”

    Joseph is a graduate of Colorado State University with a Master’s of Science in Agricultural Sciences, Plant Pathology and a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology with a minor in Spanish. He is a member of the International Seed Health Initiative and International Seed Testing Association, where he has contributed to developing protocols for pathogen detection, germination methods and seed sampling. Joseph has also conducted extensive testing of water samples under ELAP certification, testing soil, and plant tissues for nutrient needs and nematodes, and is ready to assist anyone who is interested in Safe Food Alliance’s services.

  • Testing Your Product for Glyphosate

    Glyphosate: In the News

    Chances are you’ve been hearing a lot in the news recently about glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide and plant growth regulator Roundup®.

    In early August, a jury awarded $289 million to a former groundskeeper who claimed that exposure to Roundup® caused his non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. This heavily publicized case was quickly followed by a report from the Environmental Working Group (EWG), which found that 31 out of 45 of the conventionally grown cereals being tested “…had glyphosate levels higher than what EWG scientists consider protective of children’s health with an adequate margin of safety”.

    According to the EWG report, glyphosate levels in cereals must remain under 0.01 milligrams or a concentration of 160 ppb (part-per-billion). Levels above this benchmark standard were reported to cause increased health concerns for consumers.

    The EWG report authors reached a consumption limit of 0.01 milligrams per day by applying a 100x safety factor to California’s Proposition 65 No Significant Risk Level (NSRL) for glyphosate (1.1 mg/day). This NSRL under Prop. 65 itself represents a more than a 100x reduction from the acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) set by both the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) after their reviews of the toxicity data for glyphosate. In other words, the Environmental Working Group set a “safety limit” that was 10,000-fold below the risk-based limits set by EPA and WHO!

    The European Commission is famously cautious when it comes to setting pesticide residue limits. Even using the safe intake level set by the Commission – consuming 0.3 mg of glyphosate per kg of body weight per day-a person would have to weigh less than one-tenth of a pound to stay under the EWG benchmark.

    Studies such as the EWG report raise the anxiety level for consumers trying to feed their families a healthy diet. As a result, that concern is filtering up through retailors, meaning if it hasn’t already reached you, it will soon.  As with most regulatory issues in agriculture, preparation is key. One step is to consider testingfor glyphosate residues now so that you’re pre-armed with the data your customers will demand.

    What You Need to Know About Glyphosate Analysis

    The first thing to know about glyphosate testing is that, despite the fact that it is one of the most commonly used pesticides in the US (and the world), it is not included in general pesticide residue screens.  With modern techniques and instrumentation, a multi-residue screen can cover over 300 compounds, but the chemical nature of glyphosate (high polarity / water solubility) makes it distinct from the vast majority of commonly applied pesticides. That means a specialized test is needed to be able to detect it.

    The good news is that the specific formulation of glyphosate used (isopropylamine salt, sodium salt, etc.) does not affect the analysis needed.  It is, however, important to know the residue definition for your specific market and commodity. For instance, the residue definition for glyphosate in wheat for the US and the EU requires that you only measure the amount of glyphosate in the commodity.  Codex, on the other hand, requires that you also measure the amount of N-acetylglyphosate, which is a metabolite of glyphosate; Australia requires glyphosate, N-acetylglyphosate and AMPA (another metabolite).  Make sure the testing lab you use is measuring the correct compounds for your needs. 

    The last thing that’s important when testing for glyphosate is to make sure that the laboratory doing your testing has previously validated their method for your commodity or commodity group.  Many of the methods for glyphosate analysis, including the official EU QuPPE method, have not been validated for tree nuts, avocado, animal products or other high fat matrices. Safe Food Alliance offers glyphosate analysis for most agricultural commodities grown in California (including tree nuts); either by itself, or as part of our Polar Pesticide Screen, which also includes glufosinate, ethephon, paraquat, diquat, mepiquat, and chlormequat.

    For more information on the services Safe Food Alliance laboratory offers, contact Annette Magee at annettem@safefoodalliance.com.

    This article was written by Wiley Hall from the Safe Food Alliance.  https://safefoodalliance.com/newsletter/2018-09/testing-your-product-for-glyphosate/