Tag: Exports

  • Tax Incentives for Exported Products

    Walnut Creek, Calif., (September 29, 2017) – Doug Wright is the partner‐in‐charge of International Tax Services with Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc., the largest California‐based CPA firm and CalCPA’s leading IC‐DISC services provider. Doug is a former PricewaterhouseCoopers international tax partner with over 30 years of IC‐DISC consulting and implementation experience. He is a nationally‐recognized authority on the use of “shared IC‐DISC” arrangements and maximization of IC‐DISC benefits through IRS‐ accepted strategies.

    As a leading U.S. expert on the IC‐DISC export tax incentive, Doug was the invited speaker on IC‐DISC at the CalCPA Society’s 2011 annual state‐wide international business and tax conference. He has also been an invited speaker on IC‐DISC at various national conferences, and has authored numerous articles on IC‐DISC in national publications.

    Doug currently has over 400 IC‐DISC clients throughout the U.S., including top‐five U.S. agriculture exporters in the grain, rice, cotton, and beef industries. He has a very large IC‐DISC client base in the California agriculture, farming and related processor communities. These IC‐DISC clients include an extensive number of California’s almond growers and processors, many of whom have benefited from Doug’s expertise in maximizing their IC‐DISC benefits for many years.

    BPM respects and maintains the proprietary and confidential business information of its separate IC‐DISC clients. BPM also provides direct IC‐DISC support to other CPA firms throughout California and the U.S., fully respecting the existing client relationships other CPA firms have with the IC‐DISC clients they refer to BPM.

    Doug can be contacted by e‐mail at dwright@bpmcpa.com or by phone at (925) 296‐1044.

    A frequently overlooked U.S. tax provision known as the “IC‐DISC” can offer substantial permanent U.S. tax savings for U.S. growers, farmers and processors whose products
are ultimately exported from the U.S. The IC‐DISC tax savings are achieved from a
reduced 23.8% rate (U.S. qualified dividend plus NIIT rate) on at least half of the income 
derived from qualifying products, in lieu of the normal Federal tax rate which can be almost 40%.

    Example of IC‐DISC Tax Savings

    The following simple example illustrates the potential tax savings from use of an IC‐DISC. Without IC‐DISC

     Taxable income from sales of qualifying products: $ 1,000,000
     Federal tax burden without IC‐DISC (39.6% rate): $ 396,000

     

    With IC‐DISC

    Taxable income from sales of qualifying products: $1,000,000
    Portion eligible for IC‐DISC benefits (at least 50%): $500,000
    Federal tax burden on qualifying IC‐DISC portion (23.8%rate): $119,000
    Portion not eligible for IC‐DISC benefits: $500,000
    Federal tax burden on portion not eligible (39.6% rate): $198,000
    Total Federal tax burden with IC‐DISC: $317,000
    Total IC‐DISC tax savings: $79,000

    In this example, $79,000 is the minimum annual IC-DISC tax savings.
the IC‐DISC tax savings on 70% or more of the income from qualifying products.

    Background on IC-DISC

    The IC‐DISC stands for “Interest Charge – Domestic International Sales Corporation,” a tax incentive which was introduced by Congress in its current form in 1984. It was designed to provide a U.S. tax incentive to stimulate U.S. export activities. The IC‐DISC is relatively unknown and often overlooked because other alternative tax incentives were more often used until the last remaining alternative was eliminated in 2006.

    Basic Structure of an IC‐DISC

    To utilize the IC‐DISC tax incentive, a separate IC‐DISC corporation must be established. IC‐DISC benefits cannot begin to accrue until this happens. This means that no IC‐DISC tax savings can be derived on product sales made prior to the establishment of the separate IC‐DISC entity. Establishing an IC‐DISC is a relatively inexpensive requirement, however, and can be accomplished very quickly by a qualified professional services firm.

    As designed by Congress, the IC‐DISC corporation is merely a “paper” entity without any actual operations, employees, office space or assets. It remains virtually invisible to employees and customers. It serves solely as a Congressionally‐mandated vehicle needed to qualify for the IC‐ DISC tax benefits. It is required to have separate books and records, and it is through the related booking entries that IC‐DISC benefits are tracked and determined.

    The “Shared IC‐DISC” Alternative

    Participation in a “shared IC‐DISC” is a convenient, less costly and equally effective manner in which to obtain IC‐DISC benefits. A shared IC‐DISC is simply an IC‐DISC that has been established for shared use by two or more participants who can be related or entirely unrelated. Each participant in a shared IC‐DISC derives the same tax benefits they would have derived from their own separate IC‐DISC. The costs of implementation and annual maintenance are simply less on a shared basis. No information is shared between the participants in a shared IC‐DISC.

    Increased Cash Flow and Liquidity

    It is critical to understand that income is shifted to an IC‐DISC merely through bookkeeping entries. No cash is moved to the IC‐DISC or into a separate bank account. In fact, the operating cash flow of the grower, farmer or processor will actually increase from use of the IC‐DISC, due to the substantial reduction in U.S. tax that would otherwise be incurred on such income.

    Ownership and Operation of the IC‐DISC

    Any form of operating entity can participate in an IC‐DISC, including a sole proprietorship, TIC, general partnership, limited partnership, LLC, S Corp or C Corp. The specific IC‐DISC ownership structure varies based upon each company’s specific circumstances, and whether it is participating in its own or a shared IC‐DISC. Similarly, the operation of an IC‐DISC and the determination of resulting tax savings varies based upon specific company circumstances.

    Choosing an IC‐DISC Advisory and Services Firm

    A fully‐qualified professional services firm (such as Burr Pilger Mayer) with relevant experience should handle all of the actions needed to set‐up the IC‐DISC and then maintain the separate accounting books for the IC‐DISC to ensure that all technical requirements are met. Failure to properly establish or maintain the IC‐DISC could result in “disqualification” of the IC‐DISC and/or loss of IC‐DISC tax savings. Equally important, a qualified firm can significantly increase and maximize IC‐DISC tax savings in accordance with established IRS rules.
    In recent months, less experienced and even under‐qualified firms and advisors have attempted to perform the IC‐DISC advisory and implementation roles. In some such cases, potential users of IC‐DISC have been misinformed or not fully informed, leading to situations where potential IC‐DISC benefits may be overlooked or promised IC‐DISC benefits may be lost in their entirety under future IRS audit scrutiny.

    In selecting an IC‐DISC advisory and implementation firm, you should carefully consider the following:

    • How many years of IC‐DISC and export tax incentives experience does an advisor have?
    • How large is an advisor’s existing IC‐DISC client base?
    • Does an advisor provide full turn‐key IC‐DISC services, from start‐up thru tax return?
    • How large is an advisor’s IC‐DISC team, and are its members fully‐dedicated to IC‐DISC?
    • Does an advisor stand fully behind its IC‐DISC services, including signing IC‐DISC tax returns as “paid preparer” and assuming IRS responsibility for their IC‐DISC results.
    • Can an advisor provide relevant references to other long‐standing IC‐DISC clients?
    • Can an advisor provide relevant references to other CPA firms that have referred their clients for IC‐DISC services?
    • Conclusion 
S. growers, farmers and processors whose products are ultimately exported from the U.S. can derive substantial U.S. tax savings from the IC‐DISC. It is not necessary for a grower, farmer or processor to be the actual exporter, or even to be selling to the exporter, in order to qualify for IC‐DISC tax savings. It is simply necessary to determine what portion of products is ultimately exported, and for a qualified firm to confirm that the product sales otherwise meet all IC‐DISC requirements.
    • 
IC‐DISC tax savings are truly a great opportunity for those who are properly‐ But time is of the essence in establishing the IC‐DISC company, since IC‐DISC tax savings cannot be claimed on income earned from sales made before the IC‐DISC is established (or participation in an established “shared IC‐DISC” is confirmed).
    • The experts at Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. can quickly confirm the viability of the IC‐DISC in your specific circumstances and establish appropriate IC‐DISC arrangements. With many years of IC‐DISC experience, our international tax team can help you take advantage of this powerful tax incentive. We frequently work collaboratively with clients otherwise serviced by other CPAs and advisors, so welcome questions from your CPAs or other advisors.
  • California Wine Exports Reach Record $1.62 Billion in 2016

    San Francisco, Calif., (February 16, 2017) – U.S. wine exports, 90% from California, reached $1.62 billion in winery revenues in 2016, a new record. Despite challenges from a strong dollar, winery revenues were up 1% from 2015. Volume was 412.7 million liters or 45.9 million cases.

    “California wine exports continue to reflect the trend toward premiumization with the dollar value of our wine sales outpacing volume shipments. California wines are well positioned for this trend—our vintners are offering quality, value, diverse styles and environmental stewardship in their winemaking. Combined with the state’s iconic lifestyle, innovative cuisine and beautiful destinations, California wines continue to gain attention from consumers worldwide,” said Robert P. (Bobby) Koch, Wine Institute President and CEO.

    The top 10 export markets for California wines are: the European Union’s 28-member countries, accounting for $685 million, followed by Canada, $431 million; Hong Kong, $99 million; Japan, $87 million; China, $82 million; Mexico, $24 million; South Korea, $23 million; Switzerland, $19 million; Singapore, $14 million; and Philippines, $13 million.

    “California wine exports have grown 78% by value in the last decade despite heavily-subsidized foreign competitors and high tariffs. Our global trading partners are increasingly acknowledging the high quality of wine from the Golden State and responding to our California Wines marketing efforts throughout the world,” said Wine Institute Vice President International Marketing Linsey Gallagher. Gallagher manages Wine Institute’s California Wine Export Program, involving more than 170 wineries that export to 138 countries, and 15 representatives and offices in 25 countries across the globe.

    “Trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), have helped to dramatically grow U.S. wine exports yet discriminatory non-tariff trade barriers continue to be crafted by foreign governments at a steady pace,” said Tom LaFaille, Wine Institute Vice President and International Trade Counsel. “We applaud U.S. government efforts to eliminate these barriers and strengthen our competitiveness globally, including the World Trade Organization (WTO) challenge against Canada which seeks to ensure that British Columbia grocery store consumers can choose from the vast array of the world’s great wines.”

    Wine Institute’s Regional Trade Directors in key export markets reported on 2016 exports:

    Canada

    “Canada remains a strong market for California wines and despite a slowdown in momentum, U.S. wines were still #1 in the table wine category in Canada in 2016. Retail sales of U.S. wines are now at a record 6.5 million cases and $1.1 billion dollars with the strongest increases in the provinces of Ontario, New Brunswick, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. We anticipate continued growth and are also hopeful that provincial governments will extend to California wineries equal access to retail distribution channels,” said Rick Slomka, Wine Institute Trade Director for Canada. “Canadian consumers have confidence in the quality and value offered by California wineries whose wines are successful in all price segments. Recent price increases resulting from exchange rate fluctuation may lead to slower growth.”

    Continental Europe

    “As the dollar moves towards parity with the Euro, export volumes to Europe are down in most countries, mainly in the lower priced segment. The good news is that the dollar value of California’s exports to the EU countries (excluding UK) is up 2.7% as the interest in premium California wines continues to be strong,” said Paul Molleman, Wine Institute Trade Director for Continental Europe.

    United Kingdom

    “It’s a fantastic result for California wine in the UK, continuing three years of accelerating growth. There is a very clear trend towards premiumization with +18% value growth and rising volumes (+5%). The conversation is increasingly about exceptional wine quality from California across both powerful and elegant styles. Volume shipped exceeded 13 million 9-liter cases to the UK, making it the top volume export destination for California wines globally. With the value of California exports to the UK now worth $337 million, the industry is on track to meet its target of $400 million in export sales by the end of the decade,” said Wine Institute United Kingdom Trade Director Justin Knock.

    Japan

    “U.S. bulk wine exports to Japan have been growing as major Japanese importers are now importing popular-priced California wine brands in bulk and then bottling in Japan. This reduces the burdensome import duty to a limited extent and makes inventory control easier. In 2016, we saw the last major generic California wine brand switch to local bottling,” said Ken-ichi Hori, Wine Institute Japan Trade Director. “Japanese importers of U.S. wines were disappointed to learn of the U.S. withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. They now hope the U.S. will establish a Free Trade Agreement with Japan as soon as possible to abolish the heavy import duty on U.S. wines, which will help the entire American wine category grow in Japan. This is critical for the U.S. wine industry, since our competitors, Chile and Australia, already have free trade agreements with Japan and benefit from a duty advantage over U.S. wines.”

    China

    “The significant growth in U.S. wine exports to China in 2016 is particularly important because it demonstrates a meaningful growth in higher value products. A 47% increase in value in one year, coupled with an 11% increase in volume, speaks to the inherent strength in consumer acceptance of California wines in China, despite the rising value of the U.S. dollar versus the Chinese RMB currency throughout the year. Additionally, according to research firm Wine Intelligence, the total number of imported wine consumers in China increased by 26% over the last two years. These concurrent developments signal an increasing healthy market in China and Chinese consumers’ burgeoning interest in California wines,” said Christopher Beros, Wine Institute Trade Director for China and Pacific Rim.

    Since 1985, Wine Institute has served as the administrator of the Market Access Program, a cost-share export promotion program managed by the USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service. Wine Institute’s Export Program supports California Wines worldwide with a consumer website discovercaliforniawines.com in eight languages, social media campaigns in 16 countries, an educational California Wines PowerPoint tool and videos, and a strong partnership with Visit California to increase tourism to California wine regions. Wine Institute organizes California’s participation in international trade shows and trade missions, offers master classes and seminars as well as tastings for trade, media and consumers worldwide. Last year, the program hosted 150 international media and wine buyers from 15 countries for visits to California wine country. For information, see: Wine Institute’s California Wine Export Program