Tag: climate-smart agriculture

  • Invasive Species Council, CDFA to Host April 29 Webinar

    The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) is partnering with the Invasive Species Council of California to host a public webinar on April 29 from 3 p.m. to 4:30 to give stakeholders and the public an opportunity to review and comment on the Proposition 4 grant draft guidelines, application requirements and evaluation criteria for the invasive species grants.

    When California voters approved Proposition 4 in 2024, it included $20 million for activities and projects targeting invasive species, in addition to funding for a variety of other projects supporting the state’s food systems, biodiversity, climate-smart agriculture and other nature-based climate activities. The invasive species funding will be invested in the form of grants that support work on minimizing the economic, ecological and human health impacts caused by invasive species that have been or are likely to be detected in California.

    “Invasive pests and diseases are a constant concern for farmers and ranchers,” said Karen Ross, California Agriculture Secretary and co-chair of the Invasive Species Council of California. “These grants are an investment in protecting the security of our food systems that rely on the health and resilience of the natural and working lands of California.”

    “Invasive plants and animals are a growing challenge in a changing climate,” said Wade Crowfoot, California Secretary for Natural Resources and co-chair of the Invasive Species Council of California. “They destroy infrastructure, eat crops, and spread disease. These grants will help our partners on the ground prevent and respond to these challenges earlier, protecting our farms and ecosystems, and all of us who depend on them.”

    CDFA will also accept public comments on the draft guidelines between April 29 and May 29. Comments can be submitted at cisac@iscc.ca.gov or in writing to:

    Victoria Hornbaker
    Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services
    California Department of Food and Agriculture
    1220 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814

    Proposition 4 includes a total of $300 million for a variety of activities related to supporting climate smart agriculture. This funding for invasive species work is in addition to funding for several other categories of work at CDFA: $74 million to improve the climate resilience of agricultural lands through two existing programs administered by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA)—the Healthy Soils Program ($36 million) and the State Water Efficiency and Enhancement Program ($38 million); $20 million to support farmers’ markets; and $19 million to fund urban agricultural projects.

    Those interested can register for the webinar here: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/8596881761300013914

    Story Contributed by the California Department of of Food and Ag

  • UC ANR Helps Urban Farmers with Agritourism

    UC ANR scientists, advisors and growers bring agritourism down to earth at workshop held at Alma Backyard Farms in Compton

    Before opening a farmstand or turning your ranch into a glamping getaway, Rachael Callahan recommends asking hard questions to determine whether agritourism is right for you. Such as: do you enjoy being around people?

    “Start by inviting an afterschool group to come onto your farm…see if they’re trampling on things and if that really freaks you out. See if you like chitchatting with folks,” said Callahan, statewide agritourism coordinator for the University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program.

    As part of UC Agriculture and Natural Resources, Callahan helps people navigate the “wild west” of this burgeoning industry. Over the last decade, she’s watched on-farm experiences, such as tractor rides and pick-your-own strawberries, surge in popularity.

    Given all the interest, the UC ANR Climate and Land Equity (CALE) Project hosted a free workshop on the topic at Alma Backyard Farms, an urban farm in Compton, in February.

    The mission of the CALE network is to increase land equity and climate-smart management practices by supporting smaller-scale and emerging farms. That’s why the workshop, organized alongside the LA Food Policy Council’s Cultivating Farmers program, focused on facilitating agritourism in urban areas.

    In any business, rural or urban, long-term profitability isn’t guaranteed. But expert advice can always help. In her introductory presentation, Callahan cut to the chase with the audience.

    “Agritourism is not something you should feel compelled to do because it’s trending right now or because someone down the street is doing it,” she said. “Take a hard look at how it fits into your business goals or your mission or values.”

    Jessica Handy, a grower from San Bernardino County, listened intently and reflected on her own endeavor. Recently, Handy founded Sandalwood Farm and Sanctuary, a three-quarters of an acre community garden in Rialto. Already, her space has hosted film screenings, natural-dye workshops and yoga classes, and she hopes to continue that momentum.

    “I’m building this for community and longevity. I want it to live on beyond me,” Handy said. “ I’m committed to just slowing down and doing strategic planning to make sure this land is truly community-sustained for generations to come.”

    At the workshop, local growers and UC experts shared structured guidance to help Handy and other attendees get set up for success.

    What Skills Do You and Your Team Have?

    According to Callahan, anyone considering an agritourism business should start by taking stock of their team’s capabilities, from people skills to technical know-how. Welcoming the public onto farm property is not for everyone, she cautioned.

    For Handy, though, it’s an obvious choice – Sandalwood Farm revolves around her passion for people. She created the space as a source of “food sovereignty, healing and radical joy.”

    One of her top priorities is to host farm-to-table dinners using their hand-built, earthen “cob” pizza oven, which was funded through the LA Food Policy Council’s Cultivating Farmers Grant. For Handy, these gatherings are more than a meal. They’re a connection to the earth through shared local and seasonal foods.

    “I love being able to break bread with folks on the land and have local artists and musicians incorporate art and ecology together,” Handy said.

    But what about technical skills? Workshop panelist Alexys Romo, founder of Black Thumb Farm in Panorama City, recommends investing in personal relationships to build a diverse network of support.

    “Cash in on favors. Like, remember when in 2015 I babysat your child for six hours? I now need legal advice,” Romo said. “Take a minute to assess your resources and the people within your inner web who might be able to assist.”

    Hearing from Romo was a workshop highlight for Handy, who looks up to the fellow urban farmer and follows her on social media. As it turns out, Handy has already been following her role model’s advice.

    “I  don’t know how to woodwork, but there’s a neighbor who’s a woodworker. He’s taught us how to use some power tools and a circular saw,” Handy said. “So we’re building skills together and we’re building the farm as a collective.”

    What Makes Your Farm Unique?

    With a team assembled, it’s time to think about the features of your farm or operation. What makes it special? Are there any snags to anticipate?

    Handy’s garden is relatively small, but her team has already successfully grown culinary and medicinal herbs, tree collards and several full seasons of annual vegetables, including okra, tomatoes, lettuce and arugula. The harvests are communal, so most produce goes home with volunteers and neighbors. As the farm grows, any food left over could present new opportunities.

    UC Cooperative Extension urban agriculture advisor Amrita Mukherjee recommends finding ways to add value to raw crops.

    “When growers have a surplus, they can produce shelf-stable products, like jam or jelly,” Mukherjee said. She recommends business owners connect with the UC Master Food Preserver program for support, like preservation demonstrations.

    Besides cooking up preserves, Mukherjee encourages growers to research their community’s needs and connect with grocery stores that might stock locally-grown specialty produce.

    Handy’s farm already knows what to do with their surplus harvests: this spring they’re launching a farmstand that lets people pay what they can according to a sliding scale of prices.

    Do You Have Community Support?

    Before moving forward with the logistics of starting an agritourism business, securing community buy-in is a necessity, according to Callahan. How will the neighbors feel about a public attraction setting up shop next door?

    Since establishing Sandalwood Farm last year, Handy has worked hard to introduce herself to the community.

    “I’m the new kid on the block. I didn’t grow up in Rialto,” Handy said. “I don’t want to go into a community like, ‘This is how it should be done,’ when that may not be what the community wants or needs.”

    The listening process is ongoing, but Handy has already set some goals based on conversations with her neighbors. She wants Sandalwood Farm to create job pathways for the local community, just like the workshop host site Alma Backyard Farms has done for surrounding Compton.

    “It’s beautiful to see successful models,” Handy said. “I’m reminded that we can support people and give people living wages to do this work.”

    Agritourism Expertise On-Tap

    By the end of the workshop, Handy was confident that agritourism could be a good fit for Sandalwood Farm. Even better, Handy’s intentions closely aligned with the other mission-driven guest speakers, opening the door to mentorship and collaboration.

    “Being here – I feel full and fed. I’m ready to get back in the game,” Handy said.

    The workshop provided a solid introduction to agritourism, but Callahan acknowledged that her presentation only scratched the surface. Inviting the public onto a working farm is tricky business requiring thorough research.

    Operators will need to study all applicable laws, zoning and safety regulations, which can vary by region. They may need to make changes to their site to ensure accessibility and safety, and to protect themselves from liability, they’ll need the proper insurance.

    UC Cooperative Extension can help business owners navigate these details, and resources are available on the UC ANR California Agritourism webpage.

    Prior to the event, Handy wasn’t very familiar with UC ANR, but will now consider the institution among the suite of resources available to support emerging farms, like her own.

    “We are still very scrappy…but I feel like it doesn’t have to be scrappy forever,” Handy said.

    UC Agriculture and Natural Resources brings UC information and practices to all 58 California counties. Through research and Cooperative Extension in agriculture, natural resources, economic growth, nutrition and youth development, our mission is to improve the lives of all Californians. Learn more at
    ucanr.edu and support our work at donate.ucanr.edu.

  • Fact vs. Fiction: Correcting Myths About California Dairy Methane Reduction Efforts

    Dairy Cares — Over the past eight years, California’s dairy farms have collectively achieved an annual reduction of 5 million metric tons of methane (CO2e) and counting. This is important, as scientists agree that reductions in methane emissions are critical to slowing global warming. The world-leading effort has drawn some well-deserved attention. Unfortunately, there are several common myths and misconceptions about California dairy’s methane reduction programs. Let’s explore the misnomers and the facts.

    Myth #1: California’s methane reduction efforts are focused on digesters.

    One common misconception is that digesters are the primary strategy being deployed to reduce dairy methane emissions in California. There are in fact several strategies being deployed, which are all equally important to ensuring success across all dairy farms, large and small. Here are the main strategies in no particular order:

    Strategy #1: Methane Avoidance – California dairy farms are avoiding the creation of methane via alternative manure management projects. This includes manure separators, compost pack barns, manure scrape and vacuum systems, conversion to pasture-based operations, and other practices. Through its Alternative Manure Management (AMMP) and Dairy Plus programs, the state has funded a total of 209 alternative manure management (methane avoidance) projects, more than the 142 state-funded digester projects. Estimated total annual reductions from alternative manure management projects operating to date are 252,000 MTCO2e, according to the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA).

    Strategy #2: Methane Capture and Utilization – California has 168 dairy digesters operating with about 75 more projects in development. 142 of these projects received funding from the state via the Dairy Digester Research and Development Program (DDRDP). Digesters capture methane from manure storage and put it to productive use as carbon-negative transportation fuel or other renewable energy needs. Estimated total annual reductions from operating California dairy digester projects to date are 2.53 million MTCO2e, according to information from CDFA and digester developers.

    Strategy #3: Milk Production Efficiency/Herd Attrition – California dairy farms continue to shrink their environmental footprint by producing more milk (or consistent total milk volume) with fewer cows. Milk production efficiencies continue to be gained in many ways, including improved animal nutrition, selective breeding, and enhanced animal care and comfort. Overall, while total milk production has remained relatively stable, the number of dairy cows in California has continued to shrink since 2008, resulting in far fewer emissions. Estimated total annual reductions achieved to date are 2.13 million MTCO2e, based on herd numbers from the California Air Resources Board’s California Dairy and Livestock Database. These reductions are from both manure management and enteric methane (methane emitted directly from cows).

    Strategy #4: Methane-Reducing Feed Ingredients – Additionally, a newer strategy is now also being deployed to directly address enteric methane emissions. On a growing number of farms, methane reducing feed ingredients are included in feed rations, helping reduce enteric methane emissions.

    Strategy #5: Ongoing Research – Perhaps the most important strategy continues to be research. The California dairy sector supports ongoing research efforts to validate practices and identify additional strategies for further reducing methane emissions.

    Myth #2: California’s methane reduction policies are encouraging dairy farms to grow larger.

    Another harmful myth is that California’s methane reduction programs are incentivizing farms to grow larger. While it’s true that digester projects are more financially viable on larger dairies (including those that have experienced consolidation), the financial benefits of having a digester do not incentivize growth. This myth is based on the flawed assumption that dairies receive all revenue generated by a digester and therefore increase cows to increase revenues. In practice, digesters are substantial capital investments that are not financed, operated, and owned by the dairy farm. Most digesters are owned by specialized companies and investors that have access to capital, technology, and current natural gas infrastructure.

    A 2024 analysis performed by ERA Economics found there is no evidence that digesters cause consolidation. Additionally, econometric analysis of county- and state-level farm digester data provides empirical evidence that digesters are not causing consolidation. While the California dairy sector has consolidated over the last several decades, the underlying drivers for consolidation are broad and pre-date digesters. The report from ERA Economics confirms analysis performed by the California Air Resources Board, which shows no linkage between digesters and herd growth on dairy farms.

    Myth #3: CA policies encourage the creation of more methane for digester capture.

     A similar myth is that digesters encourage dairy farms to create more methane so that more energy can be created and sold. This claim is counter to how California’s digesters are designed and operated. Nearly all California dairy digesters have a covered lagoon design. On a dairy with this kind of digester, manure is collected via flushing barn floors with recycled water that is sent to a storage lagoon before being used to irrigate forage fields. Manure stored without oxygen (in wet conditions) creates methane, which is why a plastic tarp is used to cover the lagoon, capturing methane for use as an energy source.

    As solid separator (right) removes much of the manure solids before the stream enters covered-lagoon digester.

    For best maintenance outcomes, there is a critical step that occurs before the stream enters the lagoon: separating out much of the solids via a manure separator. Installation of a mechanical separator is typically part of every farm’s digester project investment. Reducing the amount of solids that enter the lagoon reduces the amount of methane that is created and available for capture. However, it also helps prevent solids from building up in the lagoon, reduces odors, and minimizes the need for costly lagoon cleanouts. Therefore, digester projects technically use both the methane avoidance and methane capture strategies, to most effectively manage manure and reduce emissions.

    Myth #4: California dairy farms operate without regulation.

    A final myth is one that is sometimes claimed by opponents of dairy farming or uniformed media outlets: that California’s dairies operate with little to no regulation. This could not be further from the truth. California dairies operate under the strictest environmental regulations in the nation and must comply with the nation’s most stringent air quality protection rules. Dairies are already subject to multiple environmental permits and regular inspections by regional water quality authorities, regional air agencies, and county land use authorities. Each California dairy and cattle operation submits extensive, detailed reports on their operations to state authorities on an annual basis. While California’s dairies are not currently directly regulated for methane emissions, they are doing their part to voluntarily meet the state’s target for a 40% reduction by 2030. The state’s dairy methane reduction programs (DDRDP, AMMP, and Dairy Plus) are persistently over-subscribed with farm applications.

    Fact: Despite misrepresentations, dairy farmers remain dedicated.

    Dairy farmers continue to participate in important conversations about the environment, and more importantly, they continue to take action to reduce emissions. By correcting misinformation and busting harmful myths, their world-leading efforts can be better understood and supported. Achieving the full 40% reduction in dairy methane emissions by the 2030 target is within reach if additional funding is made available to continue the state’s successful programs.

    California’s dairy farmers are committed to doing their part to reduce methane in ways that benefit local communities.