Category: Pest/Disease Management

  • New Ways of Managing Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Under Study

    Walnut production is most productive on deep-rooting uniform soils with good water-holding capacity. Such soils are also conducive to infestations of plant-parasitic nematodes. Currently, the key pest of concern in walnut plantings is root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus vulnus). In California, this nematode is wide-spread in walnut producing areas and is estimated to be present in almost 85% of walnut orchards.

    Because of the longevity of a walnut planting, even barely detectable nematode numbers can cause damage to the traditional rootstocks in the life span of an orchard. English and Paradox rootstocks are susceptible to root lesion nematode. Other nematodes, root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.), can cause damage to English rootstocks. The third species frequently present in walnut soil is ring nematode (Mesocriconema xenoplax) but its damage potential has not been as well documented as for the lesion and root-knot nematode.

    Plant-parasitic nematodes entirely depend on their host plants to sustain themselves. They can injure root tissues directly, and also consume photosynthetic nutrients that otherwise would be used for plant growth and nut production. Trees of all ages are susceptible, but newly planted and young trees are especially sensitive. In addition, the so-called replant problem, a biologically-incited disease that is poorly understood, can hinder the establishment and growth of new plantings.

    Nematode problems become most challenging when an old orchard is removed and replanted. Under these conditions, the succumbing trees may have left behind huge numbers of the soil-dwelling parasites without symptoms the grower associated with nematode damage. When the young trees are exposed to these high populations, they can be severely damaged. Soil sampling for nematode evaluation when replacing an orchard should be standard practice.

    For decades, methyl bromide was used to mitigate these challenges. This material has properties that allow its injection and gaseous redistribution in different soils, and thus was effective in various soil types and soil conditions. Since methyl bromide was banned in 2005, control options have relied heavily on 1,3-D products (Telone) and mixes of 1,3-D and chloropicrin. These are suitable soil fumigants under appropriate soil conditions, especially the soil moisture must be adjusted to the required range, and soil temperatures needs to be in the proper range. Soil preparation including deep-ripping (at least 5 ft) for alleviating obstructive soil layers and removal of old roots is even more important in a 1,3-D fumigation than it was when treating with methyl bromide. Achieving these conditions is more challenging on fine-textured soils. Many growers resort to cover cropping with, e.g., a winter annual grain crop to remove excess soil moisture during the spring and summer before fumigation is performed. Reaching highest levels of performance despite all these preparations may still be a challenge. Use of 1,3-D fumigation is restricted to a maximum annual amount that may be used under a so-called “township cap”.

    Clearly, more sustainable methods of nematode management in walnut orchards are urgently needed. Three main avenues are currently being researched at the Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center: (a) development of walnut rootstocks with elevated resistance or tolerance to root lesion and other plant-parasitic nematodes, (b) implementation of chemical nematode suppression using novel nematicidal chemistries, and (c) biorational methods that rely on the use of organic amendments and cover crops for nematode suppression.

    Development of nematode-tolerant walnut rootstocks is an ongoing program inherited from the long-term efforts at the Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center. With the knowledge leap of mastering the in vitro production of new inter-species Juglans crosses, it has become possible to produce saplings originating from cross breeding. This process allows for a much improved and accelerated breeding because many plant copies can be easily made for testing of desirable tree genotypes. The nematode tolerant rootstock ‘VX211’, Phytophthora root rot resistant ‘RX1’ and the vigorously growing ‘Vlach’ are early examples of new rootstocks developed using this approach. A team from the University of California, USDA-ARS, California State University Fresno and UCANR has come together to work on rootstock improvement. Genetically diverse walnut material is produced by the breeder and given to plant pathologists, the nematologist, and physiologist for concomitant examination for desirable rootstock and scion-compatibility traits. In the nematology program, trees are planted to field plots, inoculated with root lesion and root-knot nematodes and monitored for at least two years. At that time, nematode numbers in the roots and multi-year plant growth data are used to identify elite selections that are then transplanted from the original selection orchard and further monitored for vigor and nematode dynamics. Two years after transplanting, trees are grafted to the scion ‘Chandler’ to examine graft compatibility in parallel to the root evaluations. This program has been successful in identifying advanced elites that outperform currently used clonal rootstocks under high nematode and replant problem pressure. In winter 2018, a collection of elite nematode-, Phytophthora-, and crown gall-resistant selections was planted at the Kearney Agricultural Center in Parlier, and more trees are scheduled to be planted this spring at the Nickels Soils Laboratory near Arbuckle.

    The second approach that is pursued is evaluating novel nematicidal chemistries for their activity against nematodes that affect walnuts. After many years of having few new products available for testing, several new products have recently become available. In general, these materials are much safer for the user and the environment than the old compounds were.

    The application of traditional preplant soil fumigants was relatively simple compared to newer non-fumigant products. A large tractor could apply traditional products using shanks to deliver the material to the proper soil depth. Gaseous redistribution of the material fostered good soil penetration and nematode suppression. The non-fumigant character of the new chemistries requires delivery to the site of action. This is most efficiently accomplished by a 6 acre-inch preplant water drench via a drip irrigation system. Some of the compounds need to be applied underneath a tarp for user and bystander protection. While this process is logistically challenging, it does offer promise because only a few pounds of active ingredient per acre are effective in killing nematodes compared to several hundred pounds of the old traditional materials.

    In post-plant situations, the newer products are less cumbersome to apply than preplant situations partially because existing irrigation systems may be used. Typically, lower amounts of materials are applied that do not result in the high mortality required of preplant treatments but even modest population reductions (for example, around 50%) in established orchards can improve tree growth and productivity. After several years of field testing of the new chemistries at Kearney, CWB-supported work is now underway in commercial orchard field trials.

    Lastly, novel organic amendments and cover crops for nematode suppression are tested. Large amounts of organic waste material accrue from various sources in California and novel ways of using them – or products derived from them – are coming on line. In California, a recent focus of this research has been on exploiting novel characteristics of anaerobically digested food waste and animal manures. The fermentation process is implemented for biogas and ultimately bioenergy production. The finding that some of the by-products of this process, called digestates, can suppress plant-parasitic nematodes, while also serving as a nutrient source, is being explored in walnuts and other nut crops.

    Strategies that rely on processes that occur within the field are also under study. In anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD), large amounts of organic substrate (typical 9 tons/acre of rice bran or other organic material) are spread on the soil surface, incorporated, and the soil kept moist under tarp for about one month after an initial complete soil saturation. This method is logistically challenging but has shown high levels of efficacy when preparing nursery sites for planting. Another approach shown to effectively suppress nematode populations is “biofumigation”, in which Brassica crops such as various mustards or radishes are planted and subsequently incorporated into the soil. Using similar Brassica crops as “companion crops” within walnut orchards also takes advantage of the capacities of these crops. Planted after harvest close to fall rains, cover cropping with cool-season Brassica can be a straight-forward process with few logistical challenges. The hope is that the Brassica species reduces nematode infestation by trap cropping the nematode pests or by actively reducing the populations via root exudates.

    In summary, with CWB support, a multi-pronged approach is investigated to alleviate the devastating impacts of plant-parasitic nematodes in walnuts. These studies are often highly collaborative with other experts of walnut production. The goal is to increase profitability and sustainability of walnut production while reducing its environmental impacts. This work is made possible by the gracious industry and government agency support coupled with the efforts of a highly dedicated nematology team, support from the University of California – Agricultural and Natural Resources, and the generous cooperation of grower and farm advisor collaborators.

    By Andreas Westphal, Department of Nematology, University of California, Riverside, Parlier, CA

    Plant Parasitic Nematodes
    Walnut rootstocks growing in root lesion nematode-infested soil in a walnut replant site. Standard clonal rootstock on the left, new selection on the right.
  • New Powdery Mildew Spore Trapping Technology for Grapes

    As powdery mildew begins to develop resistance to our traditional fungicides, it is more important than ever that growers apply just the right products at the right times, and a new mildew spore trapping technology is now available to help growers better diagnose what’s out in the field. Watch this brief interview with Dan Rodrigues from Vina Quest and the Cal Poly Viticulture & Enology Department as he explains.

  • Resurgence of Western Grapeleaf Skeletonizer in California Vineyards

    As if California grape growers didn’t have enough pest issues to deal with, UCCE Entomologist Surendra Dara reported a recent resurgence of the Western Grapeleaf Skeletonizer in California.  Watch this brief interview with Dara, as he shares where the pest is resurfacing and how growers can manage it both conventionally and organically.  Read more about it in American Vineyard Magazine.  Don’t currently receive the publication?  Subscribe for free at https://malcolmmedia.com/american-vineyard-subscriptions/.

  • Fiddleneck on Rangelands

    Fiddleneck (Amsinckia spp.) is a native plant in California. It occurs in grasslands and open, disturbed areas (DiTomaso, Kyser et al. 2013) and is sold as a pollinator plant in native plant seed mixes. Its bright yellow flowers catch the eye of those looking for wildflowers. However, it is important to note that fiddleneck is toxic to livestock. Fiddleneck

    Fiddleneck seeds contain pyrrolizidine alkaloids which can affect the liver of cattle, horses, and pigs (Fuller and McClintock 1986). Based on necropsies from livestock tested at the California Animal Health and Food Safety (CAHFS) Lab, plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids were the number three source of plant toxicity to livestock (Forero et al. 2011). Oleander is the number one cause of plant toxicity in California livestock, based on testing from the lab. Horses and cattle are most affected whereas sheep and goats are typically not as impacted as other livestock.

    Livestock are most likely be negatively affected by fiddleneck if they repeatedly consume contaminated hay or grain. Fuller and McClintock (1986) described one instance of poisoning in California:

    “During the winter of 1962-1963, in the central San Joaquin Valley of California, in a lot of thirty dairy calves 2 ½ to 3 months old, ten died after eating weedy hay for 2 ½ to 5 months. The hay was a first-cutting alfalfa and oat mixture; about 5% to 10% of the plants were Amsinckia intermedia. Adult cattle fed this hay at the same time were not affected. That fall, however, calves that had been carried by these cows died shortly after birth; the alkaloids had been transferred through the placenta.”

    You may not notice any problems in your animals for 2-8 months after they first begin consuming fiddleneck (Forero et al. 2011). A variety of symptoms can be seen, including eating less, losing weight, constipation, diarrhea, etc. Burrows and Tyrl (2013) summarized previous research indicating that cattle, horses, and pigs can be afflicted with walking disease (when animals walk around aimlessly) if they consume feed grain contaminated with 10-25% Amsinckia intermedia seed. If severe enough, livestock can die due to the liver disease caused by the pyrrolizidine alkaloids (Forero et al. 2011). Currently, there is no treatment available.

    Fiddleneck 2Because fiddleneck is a native plant and it is toxic to livestock, there are limited control options. If you have an infestation of fiddleneck, you may want to consider mowing, which can be effective when done before seeds are produced (DiTomaso, Kyser et al. 2013). California rangelands are often steep with rough terrain, so mowing may not be practical. Herbicides are also an option. Aminopyralid (Milestone) can be used in the early spring when plants are still in the rosette stage. Aminopyralid is a broadleaf herbicide and will not impact grasses. Chlorsulfuron (Telar) can be used as a preemergent or postemergent. For fiddleneck preemergence is the better option. Chlorsulfuron should not impact most grasses.

    Multiple agency managers and ranchers have observed that cattle tend to avoid fiddleneck because of its prickly hairs. So, as long as there is plenty of other forage available for the livestock to eat, people usually aren’t too concerned. The biggest concern is when fiddleneck is a contaminant in hay or grain because the animals are not able to selectively avoid eating it.

    It’s too late in the season to control fiddleneck this year, but it’s a good time to consider whether or not you have so much of it that it warrants control in the future. If you decide to control your fiddleneck, come up with a plan early so you know you’ll be able to conduct your control efforts at the most effective time.

  • Western Growers Statement on California DPR Ban on Chlorpyrifos

    In response to yesterday’s announcement that the California Department of Pesticide Residue (DPR) is acting to ban the use of the insecticide chlorpyrifos, Western Growers President and CEO Tom Nassif issued the following statement:

    “California farmers are universally committed to the safety of their food, the health of their workers and communities, and the sustainability of their land. At every turn, they strive to achieve efficiencies in their use of resources like water, fertilizer and pesticides, and seek to minimize both the human and environmental impacts of these inputs.”

    “California farmers also face the most stringent regulatory environment in the world, one that often limits their access to many of the tools still available to farmers elsewhere in the U.S. and in foreign countries, including certain types of pesticides. Indeed, over the last 20 years, California regulatory actions have removed several of the most important crop protection tools farmers rely on to fight pests and diseases.”

    “With yesterday’s announcement that DPR will initiate the cancellation of chlorpyrifos, one of the most widely studied and globally approved insecticides, California farmers now stand to lose yet another arrow in their quiver – without effective and ready replacement tools – making their quest to grow the safest, healthiest and most abundant food supply in the world even more difficult.”

    “California farmers are resilient, but the long-term viability of our farms in California depends on proper support from the Administration and renewed cooperation of the state’s regulatory agencies, especially in light of the many other unique and expensive regulations that place California farmers at a growing competitive disadvantage.”

    About Western Growers:

    Founded in 1926, Western Growers represents local and regional family farmers growing fresh produce in Arizona, California, Colorado and New Mexico. Our members and their workers provide half the nation’s fresh fruits, vegetables and tree nuts, including half of America’s fresh organic produce. For generations we have provided variety and healthy choices to consumers. Connect with and learn more about Western Growers on our Twitter and Facebook.

  • Plant Protection & Quarantine Releases 2018 Annual Report

    Safeguarding our Nation’s agriculture and natural resources against harmful plant pests is an awesome responsibility, one we take very seriously. Thanks to USDA’s Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) employees, cooperators, and partners, the United States has one of the most robust plant health safeguarding systems in the world. That is because we continuously take steps to enhance our ability to exclude, control, and eradicate pests and increase the safety of agricultural trade. This year, we introduced 10 strategic initiatives for 2018 and beyond that will further advance every aspect of our mission. You will learn more about them and our progress in our 2018 annual report.

    You will also learn about our many successes and accomplishments in 2018. For example, we continued to push the U.S. line of defense against invasive pests and diseases farther offshore, allowing us to take action against pests hitchhiking on or in imported goods before they reached our borders. At ports of entry, we advanced the use of data-driven sampling strategies and cutting-edge technologies to better focus inspections on the riskiest shipments and more quickly and accurately detect pests that physical inspection alone would miss. The need for these critical technologies has never been greater, given the fact that we cleared a record-breaking 1 billion plants through our Miami inspection station alone in 2018.

    Across the country, we worked with the States and other partners to detect, contain, and when possible, eradicate invading pests. I am proud of the many successes we had this year, including declaring the Asian longhorned beetle eradicated from three Ohio townships and eradicating exotic fruit flies from five quarantine areas in California and four in Texas. Our crowning achievement came in October when we declared all cotton-producing areas of the continental United States free of pink bollworm, marking the end of a 101-year-old battle with one of the world’s most damaging cotton pests.

    On the world stage, we worked closely with our international trading partners to develop and promote science-based standards, helping to create a safe, fair, and predictable agricultural trade system that minimizes the spread of invasive plant pests and diseases. We also reached critical plant health agreements and resolved plant health barriers to trade to open, expand, and retain U.S. export markets valued at nearly $23 billion. And, we issued 699,900 phytosanitary certificates, helping U.S. producers meet foreign market access requirements and secure economic opportunities for U.S. products abroad.

    These successes, and the many achievements captured in our 2018 annual report, underscore how PPQ is working every day to keep U.S. agriculture healthy and profitable.

    I am grateful to the talented men and women of PPQ and their deep commitment to our mission. I am also thankful for our partners, without whom none of this would be possible. We look forward to working with each of you in the years ahead as we continue to safeguard American agriculture against invasive pests and facilitate the safe trade of agricultural products.

    Osama El-Lissy
    PPQ Deputy Administrator

  • How to Control Grubs in Blueberries: Organic & Conventional Methods

    Bennett Water Systems

    Masked Chafer (AKA white grubs) have been problematic for blueberry growers, particularly in the Central Valley of California.  The good news is that researchers and entomologists have come up with both organic and conventional methods treatments for these soil pests.  Watch this brief interview UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor David Haviland to learn about these options and read more about it in California Fresh Fruit Magazine.

  • Navel Orangeworm Management in Figs

    Navel Orangeworm is widely known as a serious pest in tree nuts; however, it is also becoming quite the nuisance in California’s fig crop as well.  Check out this brief interview with Brad Higbee, now Field Research & Development Manager for Trece, Inc. as he talks about the work they are doing to help fig growers, and read more about it in California Fresh Fruit Magazine.

  • Sterile Insect Facility to Aid Growers with Navel Orangeworm Management

    Researchers and growers are tackling the formidable tree nut pest Navel Orangeworm from all fronts.  One method underway is in utilizing the same sterile insect technology and facility that eradicated pink bollworm from the cotton industry years ago.  There have been some challenges in adapting the system for Navel Orangeworm, as shared by Bob Klein from the Pistachio Research Board; however there is great potential for this program to aid growers in managing this pest.  Watch this brief interview with Bob and read more about it in Pacific Nut Producer Magazine.

  • Concern for Navel Orangeworm Mating Disruption

    Navel Orangeworm has become a serious pest in California for many agricultural commodities, especially for tree nuts.  Mating disruption technology has proven to be a critical tool in managing this pest; however some growers may have concerns with utilizing this technology on their farms.  Check out this brief interview with Brad Higbee, now Field Research & Development Manager for Trece, Inc. as he works with growers to overcome concerns and clear up any misconceptions regarding this novel technology in the nut industry.