Category: Ag Legislation

  • USDA Offers Flood Impacted California Farmers and Ranchers Immediate Disaster Assistance

    California Farm Service Agency Stands Ready to Assist Agricultural Producers Slammed by Recent Heavy Rains 

    California Farm Service Agency (FSA) reminds farmers and ranchers across the state of federal farm program benefits that may be available to help eligible producers recover from recent heavy rains and flooding.

    FSA offers disaster assistance and low-interest loan programs to assist agricultural producers in their recovery efforts following floods or similar qualifying natural disasters. Available programs and loans include:

    • Non-Insured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) – provides financial assistance to producers of non-insurable crops when low yields, loss of inventory, or prevented planting occur due to natural disasters (includes native grass for grazing). Eligible producers must have purchased NAP coverage for 2019 crops.
    • Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) – offers payments to eligible producers for livestock death losses in excess of normal mortality due to adverse weather. Eligible losses may include those determined by FSA to have been caused by hurricanes, floods, blizzards, wildfires, tropical storms, tornados lightening, extreme heat, and extreme cold. Producers will be required to provide verifiable documentation of death losses resulting from an eligible adverse weather event and must submit a notice of loss to their local FSA office within 30 calendar days of when the loss of livestock is apparent.
    • Tree Assistance Program (TAP) – provides assistance to eligible orchardists and nursery tree growers for qualifying tree, shrub and vine losses due to natural disaster.
    • Emergency Assistance for Livestock, Honeybees, and Farm-Raised Fish Program (ELAP) – provides emergency relief for losses due to feed or water shortages, disease, adverse weather, or other conditions, which are not adequately addressed by other disaster programs. ELAP covers physically damaged or destroyed livestock feed that was purchased or mechanically harvested forage or feedstuffs intended for use as feed for the producer’s eligible livestock. In order to be considered eligible, harvested forage must be baled; forage that is only cut, raked or windrowed is not eligible. Producers must submit a notice of loss to their local FSA office within 30 calendar days of when the loss is apparent.

    ELAP also covers up to 150 lost grazing days in instances when a producer has been forced to remove livestock from a grazing pasture due to floodwaters. For beekeepers, ELAP covers beehive losses (the physical structure) in instances where the hive has been destroyed by a natural disaster including flooding, high winds and tornadoes.

    • Emergency Loan Program – Available to producers with agriculture operations located in a county under a primary or contiguous Secretarial Disaster designation. These low interest loans help producers recover from production and physical losses due to drought, flooding.
    • Emergency Conservation Program (ECP) – provides emergency funding for farmers and ranchers to rehabilitate land severely damaged by natural disasters; includes fence loss.
    • HayNet – is an Internet-based Hay and Grazing Net Ad Service allowing farmers and ranchers to share ‘Need Hay’ ads and ‘Have Hay’ ads online. Farmers also can use another feature to post advertisements for grazing land, specifically ads announcing the availability of grazing land or ads requesting a need for land to graze. www.fsa.usda.gov/haynet.

    To establish or retain FSA program eligibility, farmers and ranchers must report prevented planting and failed acres (crops and grasses). Prevented planting acreage must be reported on form FSA-576, Notice of Loss, no later than 15 calendar days after the final planting date as established by FSA and Risk Management Agency (RMA).

    For more information on disaster assistance programs and loans visit www.fsa.usda.gov/ or contact your local FSA Office. To find your local FSA county office, visit http://offices.usda.gov.

  • Tulare County Crop Report for the week ending March 2, 2019

    SMALL GRAINS AND OTHER FIELD CROPS:
    Field crops that have already been planted are benefitting from the recent rainfall. Field activities
    have picked up due to warmer weather conditions, but stall a bit due to this week’s rain. Forage
    crops are still flourishing from the additional water. Some fields are beginning to be planted for
    spring silage.

    DECIDUOUS TREE FRUITS, NUTS, AND GRAPES:
    Bee hives are still being placed in almond orchards which are in bloom. Almond orchards are
    being pushed out and replanted with almonds or pistachios. Stored almonds are going to Hong
    Kong, Colombia, Israel, the United Kingdom, Japan, Taiwan, and Belgium. Pistachios are being
    exported to Australia, Norway, Jordan, Ukraine, Hong Kong, Egypt, Israel France, the United
    Arab Emirates, Belgium, and Mexico. Some stone fruit orchards are still being pruned, and are in
    bloom. The cooler temperatures will benefit the stone fruit orchards. Kiwifruit from out-of-state
    are continuing to be exported to the Dominican Republic and Mexico.

    CITRUS, AVOCADOS, AND OLIVES:
    Navel oranges are continuing to experience quality issues as the season and rain continues. Navel
    oranges are being exported to New Zealand, Australia, Korea, Japan, China, Chile, Peru, Fiji,
    Malaysia, Indonesia, and Mexico. Mandarins are being exported to Australia, New Zealand,
    Indonesia, Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong. Golden Nugget Mandarins have started to ship
    domestically. Lemons are still being exported to China, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Taiwan.
    Melogold grapefruit are being sent to New Zealand, Colombia, and Japan. Minneola tangelos are
    being exported to New Zealand, Japan, Hong Kong, and China.

    VEGETABLES, MELONS, AND BERRIES:
    Small amounts of winter vegetables continue to be grown and harvested. Strawberry transplants
    continue to be planted. Blueberries are blooming in greenhouses and Bumble bees have been
    imported for pollination.

    LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY:
    Grazing conditions show significant improvement due to recent rainfall. Rangeland forage is in
    good condition. The fed cattle market is consistent at $124 per hundredweight.

    ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
    Wholesale nurseries are starting to pick up on shipments to out-of-state locations for the spring
    shipping season. Ornamental nursery stock continues to be imported. Bare root rose nursery
    stock shipments continue to be received, as well as go out to eastern and western states.

    Prepared by:
    Marilyn Wright

    Tulare County Agricultural Commissioner/Sealer

  • How Retaliatory Tariffs are Impacting the Almond Industry

    There has been a lot of talk and concern about the retaliatory tariffs impacting the California almond industry, and as almond production continues increasing, just how is this all going to impact the market? Watch this brief interview with Julie Adams from the Almond Board of California as she responds to these concerns, and read more about it in Pacific Nut Producer Magazine.

  • How the New Farm Bill will Assist California Dairy Producers

    While there has been a lot of talk about the new Farm Bill that finally passed, California dairy producers may be wondering how and if it will really impact them.  Aubrey Bettencourt, Executive Director of the USDA Farm Service Agency in California shared that it will, through the new Dairy Margin Coverage Program replacing the less impactful Margin Protection Program.  Watch this brief interview as Bettencourt explains and don’t miss the Farm Bill Implementation Listening Session of February 26th.

  • USDA 2018 Farm Bill Implementation Listening Session

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture is hosting a listening session for initial input on the 2018 Farm Bill. USDA is seeking public input on the changes to existing programs implemented by the Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service and Risk Management Agency. Each agency will take into account stakeholder input when making discretionary decisions on program implementation.

    Deadline for registration to attend the event in person is February 22, 2019. Register at www.farmers.gov/farmbill.

    The event will be streamed live on www.farmers.gov/farmbill for those who are unable to attend in person. No registration is required to view the livestream.

    Written comments are encouraged by February 22, 2019; additional comments will be accepted through March 1, 2019. To submit comments, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov  and search for Docket ID USDA–2019–0001.   Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. You may also submit written comments at the listening session. Comments received will be publicly available on www.regulations.gov.

  • Statement on Bureau of Reclamation’s Initial Water Supply Allocation

    FRESNO, CA – Yesterday, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) announced a 35% initial water allocation for south-of-Delta Central Valley Project (CVP) agricultural water service contractors.
    Westlands appreciates that this initial allocation is higher than it otherwise would have been but for the diligent work by Reclamation staff to make the initial allocation as high as practicable. However, given the current hydrologic conditions, including above average precipitation and snowpack in the northern and central Sierra Nevada Mountains, a 35% allocation is further evidence that the 2009 biological opinion controlling temperature management of Shasta Reservoir is placing unreasonable restrictions on CVP operations. Moreover, the 35% initial allocation demonstrates the need to update the existing biological opinions to reflect the science that has emerged over the last decade.
    This year total runoff into the Shasta, Trinity, and Folsom reservoirs during the months of April-July is projected to be 1.0 million-acre-feet (MAF), more than was projected at this time in 2012 when the District received a final allocation of 40%. Similarly, the same comparison shows the San Joaquin basin is expected to have 1.1 MAF more runoff into the New Melones, Don Pedro, and McClure reservoirs, and storage at the San Luis Reservoir is on track to be 140-thousand-acre feet more than at this time in 2012.
    For Westlands farmers, low initial allocations create uncertainty about how much of their land can be farmed and how much productive farmland will need to be fallowed and contribute to over pumping groundwater. Westlands looks forward to working with Reclamation and other federal and state agencies to reexamine regulatory restrictions that are imposing unreasonable restriction on operations of the CVP. Westland logo
  • What is FDA Detention and What Do We Do About it?

    Detention; a word associated with childhood pranks, the principal’s office, guilt, and remorse. In a similar fashion, receiving notice from the United States (US) government that your facility’s products have been detained can also trigger those negative childhood emotions.

    FDA Detention Explained

    Detention occurs when products entering the US are refused entry; either by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or the US Customs and Border Patrol, acting on the FDA’s behalf. These detentions occur because the FDA has reason to believe that the products do not conform to US laws and regulations. The specific issues that can cause detention include:

    • adulteration/contamination
    • mislabeled or misbranded product
    • manufacturing
    • processing or packing under unsanitary conditions
    • importing products that are forbidden for sale

    Some of these detentions are the result of the FDA’s Import Alert List. This list is based upon FDA surveillance of imported products and detected patterns of noncompliance. Most listings take the form of a Red List Import Alert, in which specific firms from a certain country have a pattern of non-compliance and thus are added to the Alert. Once listed, any future products imported from that firm will be detained without physical examination (DWPE). Such products will be detained by the FDA until it can be shown that they are safe and meet pre-approved standards.

    In Action

    In some cases, Red List Import Alerts apply to products from an entire country. In 2007, the FDA traced pet deaths in the US to melamine contamination of wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate from China. During the investigation, more than 150 brands of pet food were recalled as a result of the mislabeled ingredient. Melamine, a molecule used as an industrial binding agent, flame retardant, and fertilizer, caused over 17,000 consumer complaints, 1950 deaths of cats and 2200 deaths of dogs. The devastating mistake resulted in Import Alert # 99-29 “Detention without Physical Examination of All Vegetable Protein Products from China for Animal or Human Food Use Due to the Presence of Melamine and/or Undeclared Colors”.  Districts were directed to detain all shipments with vegetable protein products to prevent the products from continuing to contaminate pet foods. Since this import alert was issued, over twenty Chinese firms producing these products have been added to the Green List, meaning they have met the compliance requirements of the FDA and are no longer subject to DWPE.

    Applying The Rule

    Any firm importing food products from abroad is strongly encouraged to familiarize themselves with the FDA Import Alert List. The list can be searched by country, industry, alert number and last published date. Within each alert, the details of the product types, firms subject to DWPE, and the specific product violations related to the alert are listed. Notices may indicate DWPE with surveillance, meaning that the FDA will be doing spot inspection and testing of those products.

    Key Alerts for Detention without Physical Examination are:

    • aflatoxin in food products (#23-14)
    • pesticides in raw agricultural commodities (#99-05)
    • and in processed foods (#99-15)
    • Salmonella in food products (#99-19)
    • sulfites in food products (#99-21)

    Reviewing this list allows you to make an informed choice of which firms to do business with and what types of product testing or evaluations to require from the seller prior to shipment. This can prevent the headache associated with a detained shipment, saving you time and money.

    At Safe Food Alliance, we have been handling FDA product detentions for over a decade. Product detention in our facility primarily involves adulteration and contamination. In terms of specific issues cited in the detentions that have been examined by Safe Food Alliance, aflatoxin has been the most common (45%), followed by pesticides (19%), pathogens (16%), quality/filth (16%) and claims of organoleptic issues/rancidity (2%). The remaining 2% of cases have involved mislabeling due to sulfite residues. Tree nuts, dried fruits, and seeds/seed pastes are the commodities which having the most violations.

    fda detention chart

    The most common example we encounter is tree nuts that fail to pass the importing nations’ aflatoxin limits and are returned to California. The FDA will typically notify the “responsible parties” of the violation by issuing a Notice of FDA Action. In our tree nut example, this is usually the handler or broker who originally shipped the load and to whom it has been returned.

    How To Handle An FDA Notice

    Step 1: If you receive a notice read it immediately and carefully!

    Step 2: Understand the terminology

    Hearing – A hearing is your opportunity to present evidence, or testimony, to overcome the appearance of a violation and to give FDA confidence that the product is in compliance. The hearing will vary from a series of email or telephone conversations to a more formal meeting.  The hearing officer is generally the FDA compliance officer listed on the Notice of Detention and Hearing.

    Testimony – Testimony is any information you wish to submit to overcome the appearance of the violation, or to otherwise support the release of your product.  Testimony should be provided to the contact that is listed on the Notice of FDA Action, usually a compliance officer.

    Charges – Charges are the reason the shipment has been detained by the FDA. Reasons include adulteration, misbranding, and restricted for sale.

    Respond by Date – The “respond by” date is the amount of time to provide testimony. If the FDA does not receive a response to the detention within the specified timeframe, the compliance officer can issue a refusal of admission.

    Definitions from https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ImportProgram/ActionsEnforcement/ucm459476.htm

    Step 3: Create a plan

    The Notice of FDA Action will cite the specific laws and regulations that appear to have been violated and are known as the charges. The FDA allows the responsible party the chance to either submit evidence to overcome the charges or submit a request to recondition the product to correct the violation. If you choose to submit evidence, known as testimony, it must be provided by the specific date listed on the Notice. This respond by date is typically 10 business days/20 calendar days from the detention date. Such testimony is typically provided in emails, telephone calls and/or hard copies and is addressed to the FDA Compliance Officer listed on the Notice. This process is known as the hearing.

    In the case of our ill-fated tree nut shipment, the testimony will typically take the form of product sampling and testing, to show that the products meet US limits for aflatoxin and can be allowed entry. In this case, it is critical that our laboratory is notified immediately so that we can begin the process of getting the products cleared.

    Step 4: Get your product tested

    It is of critical importance to work with a laboratory that has experience with FDA detention. If the analytical package is not prepared according to the FDA’s strict protocol and does not meet their standards for sampling and testing it will be rejected, delaying the process even further. Choosing to work with Safe Food Alliance provides you with everything you need to be successful. The testimony that Safe Food Alliance provides is more than a typical laboratory result. In addition to the regular results, you receive details about quality assurance, methods validations, technician training, and sampling plans.

    Note: It may not be possible to have your lab report completed by the initial response date given by FDA, in which case a request for extension must be made by the responsible party.

    What if the product fails to pass the testing process? The responsible party can submit a request to recondition the product to bring it into compliance. In our example, that might involve resorting the product to remove any moldy/damaged nuts. This would then be followed by the same sampling, testing and reporting process we described above. If the product still fails to pass, then your options are either to work with FDA and Customs/Border Protection to export the product from the US or destroy it. This product disposition must be completed within 90 days.

    Step 5: Submit Your Testimony

    If the testimony shows that the product is in compliance (in our example, the aflatoxin is below 20 parts per billion), then the data package is submitted for review and the wait begins for FDA to clear the product. This process can take several weeks; FDA may also request additional information from the responsible party and the laboratory.

    If this seems like a bureaucratic maze, you are right! The most important thing to remember is to read the notice immediately and gather all the facts you can about the detention. Next, reach out to the FDA Compliance Officer and determine exactly what is expected from you and when.

    Safe Food Alliance laboratories should be your next contact. The most common problem we encounter is that we are not contacted soon enough when our client receives their FDA Notice, resulting in insufficient time to assemble all of the evidence and triggering a panicked request for an extension. Tell us exactly what you have found out from the FDA and we can plan the next steps of sampling, testing and reporting the results that will clear your product. Remember, it is critical that the correct steps are taking when sampling and testing or the data will be rejected. Count on us to walk you through the process, and stop worrying about the principal’s office!

  • California Farm Water Coalition Statement on New Biological Assessments

    Recognizing the failure of the existing biological opinions issued a decade ago by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for Delta smelt and by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for salmon, the Bureau of Reclamation released a new biological assessment which serves as the basis for new biological opinions that will be released within 135 days. The Biological Assessment details the manner in which the agencies will operate the project and make operations more effective in preserving fish and delivering water to communities and farms. The Bureau of Reclamation is now taking a common-sense approach and applying scientific principles to water supply and fishery protections.
    “The current, outdated biological opinions have been plagued with operational problems that experts determined were largely ineffective at helping the endangered fish they were intended to help,” said Mike Wade, executive director of the California Farm Water Coalition. “In addition, the two outdated biological opinions often worked against one another, such as requiring more upstream storage for salmon to keep temperatures lower and at the same time, requiring more water to be released to the Delta to benefit smelt. These biological opinions have failed all parties – fish and wildlife, communities, and farmers,” he said.
    The Bureau’s new Biological Assessment takes into account the failures of the older biological opinions and creates a new process to modernize operations, utilizing science and operational flexibility to improve the operations and efficiency of the Central Valley and State Water projects. The Biological Assessment makes several changes to the operations of the Central Valley Project, based on the experience with the older biological opinions, the drought, and prior policy decisions. This modern Biological Assessment requires science-based operational changes that respond to actual conditions rather than follow a calendar-based approach to species protections. Using a smarter approach encourages adjustments that will allow for better temperature control for salmon while reducing the impacts on the Delta. It bases flow requirements on a variety of factors rather than using flow as the sole determinant for water project management.
    The Biological Assessment moves away from the failed presumption that water projects are the only cause of the decline in fish species.
    “The new Biological Assessment starts with a “clean slate” and seeks to determine those effects that are unrelated to the projects but are impacting fish populations in order to manage the projects. By focusing on a more integrated and holistic approach, federal and state agencies can utilize science and effective operational measures in the new biological opinions to address all the factors impacting the fish populations, he said.
    The operations analyzed in the new Biological Assessment are intended to allow the projects, designed and built to provide water to California communities, to fulfill that obligation and provide critical information to federal and state agencies that will improve the conditions for fish and wildlife and the Delta habitat.
  • Public Hearing on Proposed New “Waters of the United States”

    Hearing will be held February 27-28, 2019 in Kansas City, Kansas

    Following President Trump’s directive to provide certainty to American farmers and landowners so that the economy can continue to expand while waters are protected, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of the Army (Army) are moving to the next steps in proposing a new definition of the Waters of the United States. EPA and the Army will hold a public hearing on the proposed new “Waters of the United States” definition in Kansas City with sessions on February 27 and 28, 2019. All persons wanting to speak are encouraged to register in advance. EPA and the Army will also hold an informational webcast on February 14, 2019.

    Public Hearing Logistics: The Wednesday session of the public hearing will convene at 4:00 pm (local time) and will conclude no later than 8:00 pm. The Thursday session will convene at 9:00 am and will conclude no later than 12:00 pm.

    The public hearing will be held in the Wyandotte Ballroom of the Reardon Convention Center, 520 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Those interested in speaking at the hearing can register for a three-minute speaking slot. The last day to pre-register to speak at the hearing is February 21, 2019. On February 26, 2019, the agencies will post a general agenda for the hearing on the EPA website at https://www.epa.gov/wotus-rule/proposed-revised-definition-wotus-public-hearing. It will list pre-registered speakers in approximate order. Registration for the public hearing is available through the EPA website. Additionally, requests to speak will be taken the day of the hearing at the hearing registration desk, pending availability, and a sign language interpreter will be available for the hearing.

    Webinar Logistics: EPA and the Army will also hold a public webcast to explain the key elements of the proposed “Revised Definition of Waters of the United States” on February 14, 2019, at 3:30 pm EST. A copy of the entire webcast will be made available afterwards. Webinar registration is limited to 2,000 attendees so interested parties are encouraged to view with colleagues. Registration is available at https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/1548544876509260301.

    Background:

    On December 11, 2018, EPA and the Army signed a proposed rule providing a clear, understandable, and implementable definition of “waters of the United States” that clarifies federal authority under the Clean Water Act while respecting the role of states and tribes in managing their own land and water resources. The agencies have submitted the proposed rule to the Office of the Federal Register for publication.

    Oral comments and supporting information presented at the public hearing will be considered with the same weight as written statements and supporting information submitted during the public comment period. The agencies will take comments on the proposal for 60 days after publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register. Comments can be submitted online at https://www.regulations.gov. Please follow the instructions for submitting comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2018-0149.
    More information about the public hearing, informational webinar, and the proposed rulemaking, including the pre-publication version of the Federal Register notice, are available at: https://www.epa.gov/wotus-rule/step-two-revise.

  • Organic Farmers Enroute to D.C. to Meet New Lawmakers

    Farm Bill implementation high on list for Organic Trade Association fly-in

    Twenty-two farmer members of the Organic Trade Association’s Farmers Advisory Council, a national coalition of organic farmers and organic farming organizations representing nearly 8,000 organic farms, will come to Washington on Feb. 5 and 6 to meet with new and incumbent members of Congress, to familiarize the freshmen lawmakers with organic and to discuss the implementation of the organic provisions in the 2018 Farm Bill.

    Coordinated by the Organic Trade Association’s Farmers Advisory Council, the event will bring in farmers from 11 states stretching from California to Maryland, from Texas to Minnesota. The diverse group includes dairy farmers, grain and specialty crop growers, egg and livestock producers. The Farmers Advisory Council represents over 8,000 certified organic farmers nationwide.

    “The 116th Congress has 101 new members of the House and 10 new Senators, and many of these new lawmakers aren’t familiar with organic,” said Laura Batcha, Executive Director and CEO of the Organic Trade Association. “It’s important that we help our members get connected to these freshmen Congressional members so they can educate the new policy makers about the benefits of organic agriculture, the unique challenges that organic producers and businesses face, and the importance of federal policies that advance American organic agriculture and the organic sector.”

    Batcha said implementation of the 2018 Farm Bill will be a key discussion point. “The Organic Trade Association and its members worked hard to get top organic priorities included in the Farm Bill, and now we want to ensure that this bill – and all of its gains for organic – is implemented in a timely manner.”

    In addition to scheduled meetings with over 40 lawmakers and national agricultural organizations, the group will host an Organic farmer roundtable for congressional staff on important organic issues. The roundtable will include a moderated discussion with a panel of farmer members who were featured in the recent National Geographic article “We don’t have enough organic farms. Why not?”. They will expand on the themes highlighted in the article and lead a conversation about overcoming challenges of organic transition and closing the gap between consumer demand and domestic acreage.

    The member organizations of the Farmers Advisory Council include California Certified Organic Farmers (CCOF), Georgia Organics, Organic Egg Farmers of America, Montana Organic Association, Oregon Tilth Certified Organic, Organic Valley/CROPP Cooperative, Pennsylvania Certified Organic, Western Organic Dairy Producers Alliance and Tilth Alliance of Washington.