Category: Featured Post

  • Opportunities for Tree Nuts, Dairy & Wine in Upcoming Peru Agribusiness Trade Mission

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service is accepting applications for its agribusiness trade mission to Lima, Peru, scheduled for June 9-12, 2025. Current and potential U.S. exporters interested in participating must apply by March 12, 2025.

    “Consumers in Peru are eager to stock their pantries with world-class, high-quality food and farm products, and this mission offers a unique opportunity for U.S. exporters to meet that growing demand,” said Foreign Agricultural Service Administrator Daniel Whitley. “It will also help our agricultural community forge meaningful partnerships and unlock new avenues for growth in South America.”

    Peru is the third-largest market for U.S. agricultural exports in South America. Since the 2009 U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement, bilateral agricultural trade has risen from $1.46 billion to $5 billion in 2023, a 242.5 percent increase. In 2023, the United States was Peru’s second-largest agricultural supplier with a 13-percent market share.

    Peru and its South American trade partners offer robust logistics, distribution, processing, and cold chain capabilities, creating opportunities for exporters across industry sectors, including:

    • Beef, pork, poultry and related products
    • Dairy products
    • Tree nuts
    • Snack, bakery and confectionery products
    • Wine and distilled spirits
    • Condiments and sauces
    • Dog and cat food
    • Health-conscious foods (low-sodium, low-sugar, low-fat)
    • Ethanol
    • Live animals and feed ingredients
    • Bulk products, including pulses

    During the trade mission, participants will join buyers from Peru, Bolivia, and Ecuador for targeted business-to-business meetings to explore and discuss potential business opportunities in each country. Foreign Agricultural Service staff and regional experts will also provide in-depth market briefings, lead informative site visits, and host networking events.

    For more information or to apply, visit www.fas.usda.gov/topics/trade-missions/peru-june-2025. The application deadline is Wednesday, March 12, 2025.

    The trade mission to Peru is one of several USDA-led export promotion opportunities in 2025, with additional missions planned to Côte d’Ivoire, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and Taiwan. The agency will announce application details for these missions soon.

  • Survey: Water System Consolidations Improve Water Quality, Infrastructure

    “Nino, the water’s not coming out right; something’s going on with the well.”

    Those words – from Michael Prado Sr.’s goddaughter – are reflective of longstanding water concerns in Monson, a rural community of about 100 people in Tulare County.

    “I was one of those people who just used to turn the faucet on and expected the water to come on – I didn’t know where it came from, or what was in it,” said Prado, a retired machine operator.

    But during 29 years on the Community Services District (CSD) board of Sultana, a town four miles north of Monson, Prado became a self-described “water nerd” who learned about local water systems and the troubles faced by his neighbors. Monson historically has relied on private wells – some of which had high nitrate contamination levels. Then, during the drought of 2014-15, many of the wells ran dry and residents had to rely on bottled water or water tanks filled periodically by truck.

    That’s when Maria Herrera of Self-Help Enterprises, a community development organization serving the San Joaquin Valley, approached Prado about tying Monson into Sultana’s water system that serves about 1,000 people, and giving Monson representation on the Sultana CSD board.

    “I spoke to my board and it was a no-brainer,” said Prado, who has served as board president of the Sultana CSD for the past 14 years. “We share the school with Monson; it’s the Monson-Sultana School – the school was actually in Monson before it came to Sultana, so our board felt the need was urgent. Our kids were in that community, and we thought, ‘You know what, let’s bring them in.’”

    The Sultana-Monson project – which included building new wells, laying piping and annexing Monson into the special district – was among those studied through a groundbreaking survey conducted by Kristin Dobbin, a University of California Cooperative Extension specialist in water justice policy and planning.

    Dobbin is studying the consolidation of water systems, which can entail creating physical connections (such as pipelines) between water systems like in the Sultana-Monson project or administrative mergers that leave the physical infrastructure unchanged. About 250 consolidation projects have been completed across the state since 2015 – many of them in small, rural communities with tenuous access to safe and reliable drinking water.

    “Water system consolidation has really become, in the last eight years, a top solution in California for addressing the chronic challenges facing smaller water systems,” said Dobbin, who is based at the UC Berkeley Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management.

    The desire to improve water quality was the primary motivation for water systems to pursue consolidation projects, according to a survey conducted by UCCE specialist Kristin Dobbin. Photo by Jacek Dylag on Unsplash

    Smaller communities pursue economies of scale through mergers

    Although the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency defines a small water system as serving fewer than 3,300 people (with “very small” systems serving fewer 500), many of the systems undergoing a consolidation serve only a couple hundred residents. At such a small scale, maintaining a water system is prohibitively expensive – and smaller communities often lack the technical capability and staffing to install and adequately maintain the infrastructure.

    Consolidation aims to create economies of scale for the participating systems, which can help ensure a better quality, more sustainable water supply for all community members. To better understand the motivations – and results – of consolidation projects (both completed and in-progress), Dobbin sent a survey to 434 water systems across California in early 2024.

    Remarkably, of the 78 systems that responded, 100% of them reported that their consolidation was a success, and 82% indicated their motivations for pursuing consolidation were fully addressed. The top reason for consolidating, reported by about two-thirds of respondents, was a desire to improve water quality – not surprising, given the state’s tight regulation of water.

    “There are lot of regulatory steps and potential penalties you’re incurring, to incentivize you to get into compliance, so there’s a lot of pressure for you to solve the problem,” said Dobbin, noting that common contamination concerns include arsenic, nitrates and 1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP).

    Significantly, 74% of respondents said they were seeing or expected water quality improvements from the consolidation effort. Dobbin also highlighted that half of the systems were motivated to pursue the mergers to address future water supply and quality issues, indicating managers’ desire to secure their system from climate change-fueled impacts like drought and flooding.

    “While we do see those regulatory pressures, we also see those forward-looking desires to reduce risk and futureproof systems – and that’s a positive,” Dobbin said.

    Funding processes, long timelines present challenges for water systems

    In analyzing survey responses, Dobbin also noted some common roadblocks faced by the systems – namely, sufficient and timely funding for their efforts. Given California’s emphasis on system consolidation as a preferred way to address water challenges, most of the projects received funding from the State Water Resources Control Board. But the bottleneck – and a challenge acknowledged by the board itself – has been the process of making those funds accessible to the systems.

    It was certainly a hurdle for the Sultana-Monson project. Prado noted that, at the advice of their technical assistance provider, his community’s CSD took out a bank loan to get their project started, rather than wait for the state to allocate the funds.

    Despite the funding challenges and delays due to supply-chain disruptions during the pandemic, the pipeline connecting Monson to Sultana is complete and the system overall will benefit from more reliable and resilient water sources. But Monson residents are still waiting to connect their homes to the water system and to have their meters installed – nearly a full decade after the project was conceived.

    Extended project timelines were another frequently mentioned challenge; for projects in implementation or construction, respondents reported that they already had been working on the consolidation for an average of nine years. One key factor to help expedite that work, Dobbin noted, is the role of technical assistance providers (TAPs) – often nonprofits or community-based organizations that help water systems apply for grants and fill out crucial paperwork, from financial statements to environmental impact reports.

    “They’re often an important lifeline for the smallest systems who don’t have staff,” Dobbin explained. “A lot of our smaller water systems don’t have a general manager or a secretary; they instead have community volunteers – so these technical assistance providers play an important role in filling those gaps.”

    As just one example: 79% of water systems with TAP involvement reported improved water quality, whereas 56% of water systems without TAPs reported the same.

    A two-page summary of water system consolidation survey results can be found at https://www.kristindobbin.com/topics/consolidation.

    Researcher aims to take deeper look at system-consolidation case studies

    Dobbin pointed out that system consolidation is not a one-size-fits-all panacea for water challenges in California, but just one among a variety of options that need to be tailored to each unique community and circumstance.

    “Our survey provides really good evidence that consolidation is an important solution set in the state and that it is beneficial,” she said. “So next we need to do that contextualizing – figuring out in what cases it is the best fit.”

    In addition to studying long-term effects of consolidation on household water rates (in most cases, there appears to be an increase in rates in the short term, likely due to the need to cover infrastructure upgrades), Dobbin will be taking a deeper dive into representative case studies during the next phase of her research.

    While the survey respondents were overwhelmingly positive about their consolidation projects, Dobbin suspects there may be some selection bias – with only “successful” systems electing to report their results. In the future, Dobbin also wants to find and research those “failed” projects to better understand the factors that make consolidation efforts more or less likely to succeed.

    For Prado, however, the Sultana-Monson is already a success – even as Monson residents still wait to be connected into the consolidated system. In fact, Prado had this advice for any community considering helping a nearby town that is struggling with reliable, safe water supply.

    “Please be a friendly neighbor and good Samaritan – whatever you want to call yourself – and help out with the water for a community in need,” Prado said.

    “Water is life,” he added.

    The California Water System Consolidation Survey is supported by a two-year Early Career Research Grant from the California Institute for Water Resources, a statewide institute of UC Agriculture and Natural Resources.

    UC Agriculture and Natural Resources brings UC information and practices to all 58 California counties. Through research and Cooperative Extension in agriculture, natural resources, nutrition, economic and youth development, our mission is to improve the lives of all Californians. Learn more at ucanr.edu.

  • Foodservice Team Gets the RancHER Perspective at California Beef Council Pasture to Plate Tour

    “What happens in the day-to-day operation of a ranch?”

    “How do you protect your livestock and promote animal welfare?”

    “What environmental and conservation practices are you doing on your ranch that are sustainable?”

    “What are the benefits of raising cattle for beef and dairy products?”

    When people have questions about how food actually gets to the table, where they get their answers is important. Each year, the California Beef Council (CBC) invites retail and foodservice professionals to get answers to their questions firsthand—from the people who actually raise cattle for beef and dairy products in California. These Pasture to Plate Beef Tours bring food industry professionals face-to-face with beef and dairy producers in multiple segments of the supply chain. Recently, the CBC hosted 18 members of the foodservice team for Southern California’s largest theme park.

    “Tour attendees represent culinary, sourcing, and sustainability teams,” said Christie Van Egmond, CBC’s Director of Retail and Foodservice Marketing. “This tour provides an inside look at the beef supply chain and gives our tour guests a chance to learn more about wholesome, nutritious beef by interacting with the people who raise beef cattle and operate dairy farms in California.”

    One of the most anticipated events at last week’s CBC Pasture to Plate tour was the FarmHER & RancHER panel, a lively discussion featuring some of California’s most engaged women working on the front lines of animal agriculture. Moderated by San Diego-area rancher and the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association’s 2023 Advocate of the Year Alli Fender, the panel included Fulbright Scholar and award-winning Fresno County rancher and entrepreneur Rizpah Bellard, 4th generation Fresno County rancher and direct-to-consumer beef business owner Brooke Helsel, and 4th generation Modesto-area dairy farmer and tenured Dairy Science professor Nicole Morris.

    As Fender noted, while the panelists are all in the cattle business, each has a very different background and unique operation, and so the discussion began there. Dairy farmer Nicole Morris noted that many of the attendees must be wondering why she is on a panel about beef. While her primary focus is producing milk every single day, “dairy-beef crosses contribute about 20% of the actual beef that’s produced here in California and the U.S., so we play a small part in beef production,” she said. In addition to dairy farming, Morris is a professor of dairy science and animal science at Modesto Junior College, and coach of the college’s national championship dairy cattle judging team.

    “My brothers and I were raised in the industry up in Northern California outside of Davis,” said second generation rancher Rizpah Bellard. “We’re not like your typical cattle ranchers in California, and I think that adds to the flavor that I bring to the industry—to show that it’s for everybody.”

    Day-to-day operations, while mundane to a rancher, were eye-opening to attendees, as was the fact that many ranchers also have additional jobs. “My mom is on the ranch 365—every single day,” said fourth generation rancher Brooke Helsel. Both Helsel and her husband have outside jobs–she is with an animal health firm, and he works on another ranch. “My husband and I and our two boys live on the ranch, but mom does 95% of what we do on the ranch day-to-day.” The big days, like branding and shipping cattle, involve the entire family, including the kids.

    Morris noted that they are “milking cows 365 days a year, but that means we’re also having babies (baby calves) every single day.” Her day-to-day roles on the farm include herd health and working with veterinarians, weekly herd checks, and managing the breeding and reproduction program. “Genetics and reproduction are a big passion of mine. I organize all synchronization…handle all of the reproduction, and all of the herd health.”

    Day-to-day operations can also mean flexing with logistical issues. “My dad graduated college in the 80s, and he came out trying to run ag, but he wasn’t able to secure a loan to buy land,” said Bellard, “so ever since I was a kid, we’ve been nomadic kind of ranchers. We lease land and try to get long-term leases to put our cattle on, and if that doesn’t work out, we have to move them.” Without access to secure land, she doesn’t have access to secure sales for beef. “So I work.” Her company, Nova Farming, focuses on educating and exposing people to American and global agriculture sectors and building a bridge to agriculture as a pathway to higher education and career opportunities. Her other venture, Blynd Essence, provides housing for adults experiencing homelessness. She also works as a consultant in the area of helping small farmers access larger markets.

    In the area of sustainability, Fender asked the panelists what they each do on their different operations. “I think all of us up here as cattle producers have the best sustainability story anywhere,” said Helsel. “Cattle are the ultimate up-cyclers. They take an inedible (to humans) grass and turn it into beef…the best protein you can eat.” In addition, she noted that “first and foremost, we don’t over-graze. The land comes first. If you don’t have the land in good repair, you will not produce good beef.” She noted they also use solar for their water troughs, and that wildlife is abundant on their ranch. “I think ranchers provide a space for wildlife and a space to produce an amazing product that only benefits the land.”

    Morris agrees. “With beef cattle grazing they’re returning nutrients back to the ground; it’s full circle.” She noted in the dairy industry they don’t have access to grazing. All of their sustainability measures come primarily from recycling, like water. “All the water used on our farm (will be) used four times before it makes its way out to the field. We’re going to wash the barn down with it…we’re going to chill the milk down with our water plate coolers…we’re going to use it in our flush system…and then it’s going to go into a waste management or nutrient pond, and then it’s going to be used for fertilizer.” In addition, she continued, there are a lot of great projects going on in California with methane digesters, where methane is captured and used for alternative energy sources.

    What cattle are fed can be another part of the sustainability story, Fender noted. Her San Diego ranch has an arrangement with a craft brewery in Del Mar where the spent distiller’s grains that would just be a waste product are fed to her cattle on the ranch. Because cattle are ruminant animals, they can digest things humans can’t. “We’re able to upcycle that material into a higher protein product, and that brewer doesn’t have to go find a dump to go put it somewhere. It’s a great way to help each other out. The brewers call it ‘Brew to Moo’.” Cattle in California eat a number of agricultural by-products that would otherwise go to a landfill, such as almond hulls, citrus peels, and cotton seeds.

    “Aside from running 1,000 milking cows and 1,000 heifers on our farm, we also farm 400 acres,” Morris said. “And so we really think of ourselves as being super regenerative and sustainable because we’re growing what we’re feeding to our cows and trying to be stewards of the land.”

    Regarding animal welfare, Fender noted that there are a lot of misconceptions among the general public, and some people may not think ranchers are doing everything possible to make sure their herds are healthy. “I think one of the biggest practices that’s not understood is confinement,” Bellard said. “We confine when we’re weaning calves or taking calves off their mom. We confine them in smaller spaces to prevent them from bawling, walking the line, and not being able to eat right. At six to eight months we’re weaning them off their mom, we’re going to put them in a smaller space like four acres or five acres.” At this point, she notes, they learn to eat without mom.

    Feedlots are also misunderstood. As Fender noted, people see the cattle bunched up together even when there is more space around them. “They’re herd animals, and that’s part of their instinct,” she said.

    On the dairy side, Morris notes they utilize the National Dairy FARM program which evaluates all of their practices and protocols. On the beef side, the Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program certifies ranchers and their employees in correct animal handling and ensuring proper treatment of cattle throughout all aspects of their lives. “I do not stand for animal abuse. And we work with a licensed veterinarian, we work with a nutritionist. We have a leadership team that oversees all of our animals to make sure they’re properly cared for and handled right, because if the animal is not happy, the farmer is not happy,” Morris said.

    “Let’s just hit on BQA really quick,” Fender said, noting this is new for the audience. “It’s called Beef Quality Assurance, and its essentially a certification program that’s optional, but most ranchers do it for themselves and their employees. It’s a really valuable program, and you have to get renewed every two years. It’s a full class about animal welfare and how to take care of your cattle the best way that you can.”

    Helsel noted that one thing they have found, as they work cattle in the corrals a couple of times a year, is that “slow is fast for us. The slower you go, the quieter you are, the easier you handle these cattle, the less yelling…everything seems to work better. Cattle handle better, they’re not as stressed…honestly, I think the meat tastes better.”

    Panelists also discussed challenges in the industry, from drought and reliance on rainfall, to misperceptions about who they are and what they do as beef and dairy producers. But they also zeroed in on the positive side of more people being interested in buying from local ranchers and really getting to know where their food comes from. Bellard noted that if people want to buy from a local rancher, that rancher needs land to provide that food source. “We have land that’s being used for development…we have land being used for parks and recreation…we have people moving to the spaces not understanding what the cow poop smells like or what the flies are doing there…it’s a nuisance to them.” But these animals need room to roam, and that land is also a food source for animals other than cattle, she added.

    “A lot of kids don’t know where their food comes from,” Bellard, who also teaches kindergarten through twelfth grade students about agriculture, said. “I want young people to learn more about the ag industry so they can join us up here—so they can become producers like me.”

    In addition to the FarmHER and RancHER panel event, tour attendees visited a cow-calf ranch, dairy, calf ranch, feedyard, and beef processing facility. “Unlike other agricultural commodities, the beef supply chain is both complex and segmented,” Van Egmond said. “Tours like this allow the people who make foodservice purchasing decisions to see firsthand and better understand how all the segments of the beef supply chain work together in a way that supports the welfare of our cattle, provides open spaces and wildlife habitat, and focuses on continuously improving environmental sustainability, all while producing a delicious, nutritious protein choice.”

    CBC Pasture to Plate Beef Tours are free for California’s retail and foodservice attendees, requiring they cover only the cost of their own travel to and from the host hotel. Space for these events is limited. For more information about the Pasture to Plate Beef Tour, contact Christie Van Egmond at christie@calbeef.org.

    About the California Beef Council

    The California Beef Council (CBC) was established in 1954 to serve as the promotion, research, and education arm of the California beef industry, and is mandated by the California Food and Agricultural Code. The CBC’s mission is to position the California beef industry for sustained beef demand growth through promotion, research and education. For more information, visit www.calbeef.org.

    About the Beef Checkoff

    The Beef Checkoff Program was established as part of the 1985 Farm Bill. The checkoff assesses $1 per head on the sale of live domestic and imported cattle, in addition to a comparable assessment on imported beef and beef products. States may retain up to 50 cents on the dollar and forward the other 50 cents per head to the Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board, which administers the national checkoff program, subject to USDA approval.

  • New Legislation Aims to Boost Farmworker Pay and Support Ag Employers

    In February, Senator Shannon Grove (R-Bakersfield) introduced legislation to create a tax credit for agricultural employers to help cover the costs of providing overtime wages to farmworkers. SB 628, co-sponsored by California Association of Winegrape Growers (CAWG) and California Farm Bureau, aims to ensure that farmworkers have more opportunities to earn overtime pay while also providing relief to struggling agricultural businesses.
    “California’s farmers and farmworkers are the backbone of our agricultural economy. Unfortunately, overtime mandates have made it harder for farmworkers to get the hours they need and for growers to get their product to market,” said Senator Shannon Grove. “SB 628 is a commonsense solution that ensures farmworkers have more opportunities to earn, while providing relief to our agricultural businesses who sustain the world’s food chain supply.”
    SB 628 would do the following:
    • Establish a payroll tax credit allowing agricultural employers to offset the cost of overtime wages paid to their ag employees. NOTE: “Overtime wages” means the difference between the employees’ overtime rate of pay and their regular rate of pay.
    • Help increase available overtime hours for farmworkers, boosting their take-home pay, and supporting much-needed financial stability in rural California.
    “In 2016, when AB 1066 (Gonzalez) was approved to phase in agricultural overtime, growers warned that this new law would ultimately reduce farmworkers’ earnings,” said Natalie Collins, President of the California Association of Winegrape Growers. “Today, with the smallest winegrape harvest in 20 years, growers are struggling to stay in business. If legislators genuinely want to increase take-home pay for farmworkers, growers are going to need support from Sacramento to make it possible. CAWG thanks Senator Grove for her leadership on this important issue.”
    “California farmers are incredibly resilient, but it is no secret that agriculture faces significant economic challenges,” said California Farm Bureau President Shannon Douglass. “Research has shown that placing the burden of overtime wages on farmers came at the expense of both farming operations and the families of farm employees. Senator Grove’s agricultural overtime tax credit bill is a sensible solution that will enable farmers to continue producing food while providing a real and richly deserved boost in take-home pay for farm employees. It is an investment in our food security and rural communities and in the long-term sustainability of production agriculture in California.”
    Recent research supports these concerns. A 2023 study by the University of California, Berkeley (“California’s Overtime Law for Agricultural Workers: What Happened to Worker Hours and Pay?” ARE Update 27(1): 1–4. University of California Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics) found that California farmworkers have been earning less since the “Phase-In Overtime for Agricultural Workers Act of 2016” became law. The study concluded, “This early evidence suggests that the law may not be benefiting the workers they aim to protect.”
    SB 628 follows the lead of other states that have recognized the unintended consequences of agricultural overtime laws and acted to ensure farmworkers can still earn overtime pay:
    • Oregon offers a refundable personal or corporate income tax credit for employers based on overtime wages paid to agricultural workers through 2028.
    • New York offers a similar tax credit through 2032 that is based on the eligible overtime agricultural businesses pay.
    Together, Senator Shannon Grove, CAWG and the California Farm Bureau are advocating for a policy that both increases farmworker earnings and provides relief to an industry facing unprecedented financial challenges. California must ensure that policies designed to help farmworkers do not inadvertently reduce their wages.
    About the California Association of Winegrape Growers: CAWG is a statewide nonprofit trade association advocating for California’s winegrape growers to ensure the sustainability of the winegrape industry. CAWG promotes the industry’s long-term success by advancing the adoption of sound public policies and fostering awareness and understanding of winegrape growers’ contributions to the economy, environment, and California communities. Learn more at cawg.org.
    About the California Farm Bureau: The California Farm Bureau works to protect family farms and ranches on behalf of more than 26,000 members statewide and as part of a nationwide network of 5.8 million Farm Bureau members. Learn more at cfbf.com.
    About Senator Shannon Grove: Representative of California’s 12th Senate District, which encompasses large portions of Fresno, Kern, and Tulare counties.
  • Ag Retailers Honor House Ag Committee Chairman as Legislator of the Year

    The Agricultural Retailers Association (ARA) honors House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson, R-Pa., with the 2024 Legislator of the Year award for his support of agricultural retailers.

    “Rep. Thompson’s leadership has promoted policies that help to protect ARA member companies’ freedom to operate profitably as they deliver essential services and products to their farmer customers when they need it,” says ARA President & CEO Daren Coppock.

    “His staunch support for the ag retail industry, specifically his sponsorship of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2024, aimed to reauthorize essential Farm Bill programs through 2029 and secure critical financial and disaster assistance for the agricultural community.

    “ARA looks forward to continuing to work with Rep. Thompson and his colleagues in Congress to advance ARA’s public policy priorities established by our membership.”

    Each year, ARA recognizes two legislators who have championed the issues of importance to agriculture and agriculture suppliers.

    “I’m honored to receive this recognition from the Agricultural Retailers Association,” says Chairman Thompson.

    “ARA is a tremendous advocate for policies that support farmers and the businesses that keep American agriculture moving forward. I appreciate their partnership in pushing for a strong farm bill, which will ensure producers and the entire agricultural supply chain get the tools, certainty, and resources they need.”

    ARA unites its members and their interests to advocate and educate on their behalf, provide services to improve their businesses, and preserve their freedom to operate and innovate, ensuring a safe and plentiful food supply for all.

    To view other recipients of this award, visit the ARA’s website.

    About Agricultural Retailers Association
    The Agricultural Retailers Association (ARA) is a nonprofit trade association representing the interests of retailers across the United States on legislative and regulatory issues on Capitol Hill. As the political voice of agricultural retailers, ARA not only represents its membership but also educates members on the political process and important issues affecting the industry. For more information on current legislative and regulatory issues impacting agricultural retailers, visit www.aradc.org.

    ARA annual Winter Board Meeting & Legislative Fly-In.
  • Historic Grape Crush Report and Live-Streamed Event to Explain It All

    California has just come off of the smallest grape crush the state has experienced in decades. Join American Vineyard live on February 21, 2025, at 10 AM PST to review the 2024 Grape Crush Report and what it means to wine grape growers, vintners, and industry stakeholders in California and worldwide. American Vineyard Live and the team at Turrentine Brokerage will dive deep into questions stakeholders have such as: What is the Grape Crush Report? Why such a low crush this year? Why were quality grapes left unharvested in 2024? How will the 2024 Grape Crush Report impact my decisions in 2025 and beyond? Will the wine market improve in 2025? How can we use the 2024 Grape Crush Report? What can the 2024 Grape Crush Report do to help me make decisions for my vineyard?

    The panel discussion will be streamed live from Fresno, California for all interested viewers worldwide. It is a FREE live stream for anyone who would like to attend virtually. Registered viewers will be automatically entered into a drawing to win a $100 Amazon Gift card or brand new Bahco hand pruning tools. Prize winners will be announced during the event (must be “present” online to win).

    Questions about the 2024 Grape Crush Report for the panelists can be submitted when registering to attend. Questions will be answered live during the event.

    No special software or login is needed to register or join the event. Just register HERE, and a link to join the event will be emailed to the address provided.

    Stay informed on the 2024 Grape Crush Report and how it can serve as a compass to lead to a more successful 2025! “There has never been a more crucial time to use the information we have to navigate the headwinds of today’s market. We look forward to seeing you on the live stream!” says Matthew Malcolm, Editor of American Vineyard Magazine.

    REGISTER HERE

  • Signs of Stabilization in the Wine Market on the Horizon

    With the preliminary Crush Report revealing the lowest wine grape crush California has experienced in many years, and having heard from State of the Wine Industry panelists at Unified Wine & Grape Symposium, including Glenn Proctor from Ciatti Company, growers and winemakers are still wondering when will things get better for the wine industry. Watch this brief video as Matthew Malcolm from California Ag Network interviews Glenn sharing that hope is on the horizon based on new indicators in the global wine market. Read more in American Vineyard Magazine.

  • Watermelon Growers Face Challenges When Expanding Their Season

    Watermelon is a favorite summertime treat for consumers. Naturally anticipating those summer picnics and BBQs, consumers may want to enjoy this sweet treat earlier or even later in the year, outside of California’s traditional harvest window. Determined to meet consumer demand with an innovative spirit, California growers are planting watermelons earlier than ever before and expanding their seasons late into the fall as well. This does not come without consequence though, and growers faced some particular challenges during their extended 2024 season that they won’t soon forget. Watch this brief interview as Zheng Wang, UCCE Vegetable Crop Advisor — specializing in Central Valley melon crops, discusses these challenges with Matthew Malcolm on California Ag Network. Read more in California Fruit & Vegetable Magazine.

  • Hazelnut Farmer Sues Federal Gov’t Over Credibility of Organic Claimed Foreign Imports

    Organic farmers in the US undergo some of the most strict regulations and certification procedures in the world in order to obtain the consumer-trusted “USDA Organic” logo on their harvested crops, naturally commanding a premium price; however, when imported foreign products hit the US market and secure “USDA Organic” status, can consumers trust that those products came from farms that met the same criteria as required by US organic farms?  Bruce Kaser, an organic hazelnut grower in Oregon would beg to differ and is suing the federal government over what he claims not only comprises the integrity of the entire organic sector, but is also financially damaging to the American farmer. Watch this brief interview as Pacific Nut Producer Editor Matthew Malcolm meets with Bruce to discuss the details.

    Please thank this video’s sponsor George Packing Company for their industry support.

  • Local Chefs at Whole Vine Festival Awarded for Innovative Use of California Table Grapes

    To support the local and innovative culinary use of grapes, the California Table Grape Commission sponsored a competition at the recent Whole Vine Festival, awarding cash prizes to the top three food trucks incorporating grapes from California on their menus. A $1,000 grand prize was awarded to Rice and Spice for their Thai Papaya (and grape) salad. Runner up $250 prizes went to Marcelino’s Wood Fired Pizza for their Whole Vine Pie (grape & balsamic glaze reduction drizzled over cheese blend topped with arugula and fresh sliced grapes) and their dessert pizza (with red grapes, brie and honey), and Madtown’s Burger & Tacos for their Grape Pollination Salad and PB&J Burger.  Watch this brief interview with Whole Vine Festival President Vickie Goudreau as she introduces the grand prize winner and shares more details with Matthew Malcolm on California Ag Network.